Due to COVID-19 Pandemic, the economy of Finland is in a recession. The government is planning to increase government spending by 30 billion euros. Assume that marginal propensity to consume is 0.75 and there is no crowding-out effect.  Define this policy measure and its consequences.  Quantify the total effect of an increase in government spending on aggregate demand. Compare if the tax cut of 30 billion euros would lead to the same result.  Discuss how can the crowding-out effect change the consequences of an increase in government spending.

Due to COVID-19 Pandemic, the economy of Finland is in a recession. The government is planning to increase government spending by 30 billion euros. Assume that marginal propensity to consume is 0.75 and there is no crowding-out effect.  Define this policy measure and its consequences.  Quantify the total effect of an increase in government spending on aggregate demand. Compare if the tax cut of 30 billion euros would lead to the same result.  Discuss how can the crowding-out effect change the consequences of an increase in government spending.

MACROECONOMICS FOR TODAY

10th Edition

ISBN:9781337613057

Author:Tucker

Publisher:Tucker

Chapter11: Fiscal Policy

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 5SQP

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

i need in words .(not handwritten) Q4: Due to COVID-19 Pandemic, the economy of Finland is in a recession. The government is planning to increase government spending by 30 billion euros. Assume that marginal propensity to consume is 0.75 and there is no crowding-out effect. Define this policy measure and its consequences. Quantify the total effect of an increase in government spending on aggregate demand. Compare if the tax cut of 30 billion euros would lead to the same result. Discuss how can the crowding-out effect change the consequences of an increase in government spending.
The federal government implements an expansionary fiscal policy of increased spending and decreased taxes. Policy advisors predict output will increase 4% but are surprised when only 3% growth occurs. What might account for the fact that GDP increased by less than the multiplier predicted? a. Policy advisors' calculation of MPS was too high b. The aggregate supply curve was perfectly elastic c. Foreign purchases of domestic goods was greater than expected due to a devalued currency d. Consumption increases more than expected because of the decrease in taxes e. Investment decreased due to rising interest rates
Discretionary fiscal policy and multiplier effects Consider a hypothetical economy in which the marginal propensity to consume (MPC) is 0.8. The following graph shows the aggregate demand curves (AD1AD1 and AD2AD2), the short-run aggregate supply curve (SRASSRAS), and the long-run aggregate supply curve (LRASLRAS). The economy is currently at point A. The economy is currently experiencing an expansionary a recessionary gap of $ billion. In order to close this gap, one option would be for the government to decrease increase government purchases by billion (assuming net taxes do not change).
Assume that the economy is in a severe recession with a high level of under-utilized capacity. The estimated overall consumption function is: C = $150 million + 0.9 Y The government estimates that a $180 B increase in Aggregate Demand is necessary to restore the economy to a full-employment level of output. It determines that the best way to do achieve this is through fiscal stimulus. If the government wanted to maintain a balanced budget, would it be able to stimulate the economy through fiscal policy actions? How could it do this?
Given MPC (marginal propensity to consume) = 0.75, if the government implements an expansionary fiscal policy as (1) cutting taxes by $10 billion, then by how much would total spending increase over an infinite period? (2) spending $10 billion, then by how much would total spending increase over an infinite period?
If the Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC) is .90, estimate the total (multiplied) effect of government purchases/spending of $100B in the economy in terms of its aggregate expenditure (Hint: Multiplier = 1 / 1 – MPC). Calculate the net cumulative change in aggregate expenditure if taxes were cut by $200 billion and MPC is estimated to be .75. What if government expenditure was increased by $200 billion? (Hint: Total change in expenditure = multiplier x new expenditure or spending injection)
Suppose the economy is in recession. Policymakers estimate that aggregate demand is $100 billion short of the amount necessary to generate the long run natural rate of output. That is, if aggregate demand were shifted to the right by $100 billion, the economy would be in long run equilibrium. a.Explain the impact on the economy if the government chooses to use fiscal policy to stabilize the economy and the marginal propensity to consume (MPC) is given as 0.75 with no crowding out. b.If there is a crowding out effect and investment is very sensitive to changes in the interest rate, should the government increase spending more or less than this amount?
The program has provoked a lot of political discussions. Which of the following statementsare correct (assuming a closed economy)? 1. The higher the marginal propensity to consume, the lower will be investment multiplier.2. A reduction of the tax rate lowers the fiscal policy multiplier.3. The higher the marginal propensity to consume, the more consumption can be induced bymore government spending, and this will lead to a higher fiscal policy multiplier.4. When fiscal policy is not able to compensate fully for other demand reductions, anexpansionary monetary policy can be helpful to overcome a recession more quickly.5. An expansionary monetary policy by the ECB in combination with a fiscal expansion willalways lead to inflation.6. Only a consequent fiscal consolidation will help the economy out of a recession.7. In the liquidity trap there is no crowding-out effect to be expected.8. It is best to conduct fiscal consolidation when the economy is in a boom.
Japanese economy is in a recession. Assume the Japanese spend 4/5 of their disposable income. Furthermore, assume that the Japanese government increases its spending by ¥150 trillion and in order to maintain a balanced budget simultaneously increases taxes by ¥150 trillion.Calculate the effect the ¥150 trillion change in government spending and ¥150 trillion change in taxes on Japanese Aggregate Demand.
Suppose economists observe that an increase in government spending of 700 crore taka that raises the total demand for goods and services by 900 crore taka. If economists ignore the possibility of crowding out effect, calculate the marginal propensity to consume (MPC)? Answer Must be correct. Do all step and calculation
An economy is operating with an output that is $400 billion dollars below its natural rate of $2000 billion dollars and fiscal policy makers want to close the recessionary gap. The central bank agrees to hold the interest rate constant so there is no crowding out. The marginal propensity to consume is 4/5. In which direction and by how much would the government spending need to change to close the gap? Fully explain your answer and provide a graph that shows the initial situation
How much government spending needs to be increased to maintain full employment in the economy if the economy was facing recessionary gap of $800 billions? Assume MPC is .8. How much tax cut should government give if they wanted to eliminate this recessionary gap through tax cut