Economics: Industrial Economics Question Consider the following sequential game between firm 1 and firm 2: First, firm 1 decides to either adopt an aggressive marketing strategy or not. Second, Firm 2 observes firm 1's decision and then also decides between its own aggressive strategy, a passive strategy or whether to leave the market altogether. The profits (in millions of dollars) of the firms are as follows: If both adopt an aggressive strategy, then firm 1's payoff is $14 and firm 2's is $1. If firm 1 adopts an aggressive strategy and firm 2 does not, then the payoff for firm 1 is $21 and for firm 2 is -$5. If firm 1 does nothing and firm 2 adopts an aggressive strategy, firm 1's payoff is $10 and firm 2's is $9. If both do nothing, then firm 1 makes $20 in profits and firm 2 makes $5. Finally, if firm 2 leaves the market altogether, it makes $0 and firm 1 makes $20 with an aggressive strategy and $24 without one. 1. Using the principle of backward induction, the most reasonable prediction is that Choices: A. Both firms adopt an aggressive strategy. B. Firm 1 adopts a passive strategy and firm 2 an aggressive strategy. C. Firm 1 adopts a passive strategy and firm 2 exits the market. D. Firm 1 adopts an aggressive strategy and firm 2 exits the market. Guess: Firm 1 adopts an aggressive strategy and firm 2 exits the market. Now assume that Firm 2 has the chance of preempting Firm 1's move. That is, firm 2 has the opportunity to publicly commit to its strategy (of being aggressive, passive or leaving) before firm 1 decides what to do. 2. Then firm 2 should Choices: A. Pre-empt firm one by committing to a passive strategy (resulting in positive profits) B. Not care whether to pre-empt firm 1 or not since the outcome will be to leave the market. C. Pre-empt firm one by committing to an aggressive strategy (resulting in positive profits) D. Not pre-empt firm one and wait to see what it does (resulting in positive profits) Guess: The best option for firm 2 is to pre-empt firm one by committing to a passive strategy (resulting in positive profits).
Economics: Industrial Economics Question Consider the following sequential game between firm 1 and firm 2: First, firm 1 decides to either adopt an aggressive marketing strategy or not. Second, Firm 2 observes firm 1's decision and then also decides between its own aggressive strategy, a passive strategy or whether to leave the market altogether. The profits (in millions of dollars) of the firms are as follows: If both adopt an aggressive strategy, then firm 1's payoff is $14 and firm 2's is $1. If firm 1 adopts an aggressive strategy and firm 2 does not, then the payoff for firm 1 is $21 and for firm 2 is -$5. If firm 1 does nothing and firm 2 adopts an aggressive strategy, firm 1's payoff is $10 and firm 2's is $9. If both do nothing, then firm 1 makes $20 in profits and firm 2 makes $5. Finally, if firm 2 leaves the market altogether, it makes $0 and firm 1 makes $20 with an aggressive strategy and $24 without one. 1. Using the principle of backward induction, the most reasonable prediction is that Choices: A. Both firms adopt an aggressive strategy. B. Firm 1 adopts a passive strategy and firm 2 an aggressive strategy. C. Firm 1 adopts a passive strategy and firm 2 exits the market. D. Firm 1 adopts an aggressive strategy and firm 2 exits the market. Guess: Firm 1 adopts an aggressive strategy and firm 2 exits the market. Now assume that Firm 2 has the chance of preempting Firm 1's move. That is, firm 2 has the opportunity to publicly commit to its strategy (of being aggressive, passive or leaving) before firm 1 decides what to do. 2. Then firm 2 should Choices: A. Pre-empt firm one by committing to a passive strategy (resulting in positive profits) B. Not care whether to pre-empt firm 1 or not since the outcome will be to leave the market. C. Pre-empt firm one by committing to an aggressive strategy (resulting in positive profits) D. Not pre-empt firm one and wait to see what it does (resulting in positive profits) Guess: The best option for firm 2 is to pre-empt firm one by committing to a passive strategy (resulting in positive profits).
Microeconomics A Contemporary Intro
10th Edition
ISBN:9781285635101
Author:MCEACHERN
Publisher:MCEACHERN
Chapter10: Monopolistic Competition And Oligopoly
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 13PAE
Related questions
Question
Economics: Industrial Economics
Question
Consider the following sequential game between firm 1 and firm 2:
First, firm 1 decides to either adopt an aggressive marketing strategy or not. Second, Firm 2 observes firm 1's decision and then also decides between its own aggressive strategy, a passive strategy or whether to leave the market altogether. The profits (in millions of dollars) of the firms are as follows: If both adopt an aggressive strategy, then firm 1's payoff is $14 and firm 2's is $1. If firm 1 adopts an aggressive strategy and firm 2 does not, then the payoff for firm 1 is $21 and for firm 2 is -$5. If firm 1 does nothing and firm 2 adopts an aggressive strategy, firm 1's payoff is $10 and firm 2's is $9. If both do nothing, then firm 1 makes $20 in profits and firm 2 makes $5. Finally, if firm 2 leaves the market altogether, it makes $0 and firm 1 makes $20 with an aggressive strategy and $24 without one.
1. Using the principle of backward induction, the most reasonable prediction is that
Choices:
A. Both firms adopt an aggressive strategy.
B. Firm 1 adopts a passive strategy and firm 2 an aggressive strategy.
C. Firm 1 adopts a passive strategy and firm 2 exits the market.
D. Firm 1 adopts an aggressive strategy and firm 2 exits the market.
Guess: Firm 1 adopts an aggressive strategy and firm 2 exits the market.
Now assume that Firm 2 has the chance of preempting Firm 1's move. That is, firm 2 has the opportunity to publicly commit to its strategy (of being aggressive, passive or leaving) before firm 1 decides what to do.
2. Then firm 2 should
Choices:
A. Pre-empt firm one by committing to a passive strategy (resulting in positive profits)
B. Not care whether to pre-empt firm 1 or not since the outcome will be to leave the market.
C. Pre-empt firm one by committing to an aggressive strategy (resulting in positive profits)
D. Not pre-empt firm one and wait to see what it does (resulting in positive profits)
Guess: The best option for firm 2 is to pre-empt firm one by committing to a passive strategy (resulting in positive profits).
Thank you for your help and support Instructor Agent!
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 4 steps
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Microeconomics
Economics
ISBN:
9781305156050
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Principles of Microeconomics
Economics
ISBN:
9781305156050
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning