5 KFifty-four wild bears were anesthetized, and then their weights and chest sizes were measured and listed in a data set. Results are shown in theaccompanying display. Is there sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between the weights of bears and theirchest sizes? When measuring an anesthetized bear, is it easier to measure chest size than weight? If so, does it appear that a measured chestsize can be used to predict the weight? Use a significance level of a = 0.05.Determine the null and alternative hypotheses.Ho: PH₁: P ▼(Type integers or decimals. Do not round.)Identify the correlation coefficient, r.r= (Round to three decimal places as needed.)Identify the critical value(s).(Round to three decimal places as needed.)O A. There are two critical values at r= ±OB. There is one critical value at r=***OB. Yes, because the absolute value of the test statisticOC. Yes, because the test statisticIs there sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between the weights of bears and their chest sizes? Choose the correct answer below and,if necessary, fill in the answer box within your choice.(Round to three decimal places as needed.)OA. No, because the absolute value of the test statisticCorrelation ResultsCorrelation coeff, r: 0.952597Critical r:±0.2680855P-value (two tailed): 0.000exceeds the critical value.exceeds the critical value.falls between the critical values.OD. No, because the test statisticfalls between the critical values.O E. The answer cannot be determined from the given information.When measuring an anesthetized bear, is it easier to measure chest size than weight? If so, does it appear that a measured chest size can be used to predict the weight?OA. Yes, it is easier to measure a chest size than a weight because measuring weight would require lifting the bear onto the scale. The chest size could not be used to predictweight because there is not a linear correlation between the two.OB. Yes, it is easier to measure a chest size than a weight because measuring weight would require lifting the bear onto the scale. The chest size could be used to predict weightbecause there is a linear correlation between the two.OC. No, it is easier to measure weight than chest size because the chest is not a flat surface.OD. Yes, it is easier to measure a chest size than a weight because measuring weight would require lifting the bear onto the scale. The chest size could not be used to predictweight because there is too much variance in the weight of the bears.

Question

Accepted Answer

Hello! Thanks for the question. As per guidelines, we are answering the first three parts in the…