Figure 11-5Firm AAdvertiseNot AdvertiseFirm A70Firm A30AdvertiseFirm B80Firm B150Firm BFirm A140Firm A90Not AdvertiseFirm B60Firm B100Figure 11-5 shows the payoffs for two firms in a market that must decide whether ornot to advertise. The dominant strategy isa) for Firm A to advertise but not Firm B.b) for neither firm to advertise.C) for both firms to advertise.d) for Firm B to advertise but not Firm A.

A player is said to have a dominant strategy if he sticks to his decision irrespective of what other…

Figure 11-5 Firm A Advertise Not Advertise Firm A 70 Firm A 30 Advertise Firm B 80 Firm B 150 Firm B Firm A 140 Firm A 90 Not Advertise Firm B 60 Firm B 100 Figure 11-5 shows the payoffs for two firms in a market that must decide whether oi not to advertise. The dominant strategy is a) for Firm A to advertise but not Firm B. b) for neither firm to advertise. C) for both firms to advertise. d) for Firm B to advertise but not Firm A.

Figure 11-5 Firm A Advertise Not Advertise Firm A 70 Firm A 30 Advertise Firm B 80 Firm B 150 Firm B Firm A 140 Firm A 90 Not Advertise Firm B 60 Firm B 100 Figure 11-5 shows the payoffs for two firms in a market that must decide whether oi not to advertise. The dominant strategy is a) for Firm A to advertise but not Firm B. b) for neither firm to advertise. C) for both firms to advertise. d) for Firm B to advertise but not Firm A.

Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach

5th Edition

ISBN:9781337106665

Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor

Publisher:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor

Chapter15: Strategic Games

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 3MC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Sometimes oligopolies in the same industry are very different in size. Suppose we have a duopoly where one firm (Film A) is large and the other film (Film B) is small, as the prisoners dilemma box in Table 10.4 shows. Assuming that both films know the payoffs, what is the likely outcome in this case?
Does each individual in a prisoners dilemma benefit more from cooperation or from pursuing self-interest? Explain briefly.
Consider a situation where two firms, 1 and 2, compete by choosing prices simultaneously. Theycan either compete (charge a low price) or cooperate (collude, charging a high price). The firmsplay this competition game repeatedly and indefinitely, using a grim trigger strategy toincentivize cooperation. They use the same interest rate, i, to discount future payoffs. Payoffsare $4,050 when both firms cooperate and $3,600 when they compete. If one firm charge a lowprice while the other charges a high price, the firm charging the low price gets $7,200, and theother gets zero, but now assume there is a 10% chance that aregulatory agency will give both firms a $1,500 fine in each period if they are caught colluding.Find the condition on the interest rate, i , necessary for sustaining the cooperative equilibrium.Which of the following statements is correct?(a) For any i < 1/7 the firms will cooperate.(b) For any i < 1/11 the firms will cooperate.(c) For any i > 1/11 the firms will…
Suppose that there are two firms in a market, firm 1 and firm 2. The marketis declining in size. The game starts in period 0, and the firms can compete in periods 0, 1,2, 3, ... (i.e., indefinitely) if they so choose. Duopoly profits in period t for firm 1 are equalto 105 −10t, and they are 10.5 −t for firm 2. Monopoly profits (those if a firm is the onlyone left in the market) are 510 −25t for firm 1 and 51 −2t for firm 2. At the start of eachperiod, each firm must decide either to “stay in” or “exit” if it is still active (they do sosimultaneously if both are still active). Once a firm exits, it is out of the market forever andearns zero in each period thereafter. Firms maximize their (undiscounted) sum of profits.What is this game’s subgame perfect Nash equilibrium?