Gene-mapping methods have changed significantly in the last century. Can you identify which of the following statements are true and which are false? Place "True" or "False" at the end of each statement. Reset Help True The locations of expressed genes can be studied with DNA genetic markers such as restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPS) and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPS). False Human genome mapping was greatly enhanced by molecular genetic methods to identify DNA genetic markers and perform genomic analysis. Traditional gene-mapping methods based on recombination analysis were easily applied to human gene mapping. The first genetic linkage map was created in 1911 by using DNA genetic markers that had been recently sequenced in Drosophila. Disease-causing genes can be located by using DNA genetic markers. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPS) are typically identified with the aid of restriction enzymes that cut specific sequences of DNA.

Gene-mapping methods have changed significantly in the last century. Can you identify which of the following statements are true and which are false? Place "True" or "False" at the end of each statement. Reset Help True The locations of expressed genes can be studied with DNA genetic markers such as restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPS) and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPS). False Human genome mapping was greatly enhanced by molecular genetic methods to identify DNA genetic markers and perform genomic analysis. Traditional gene-mapping methods based on recombination analysis were easily applied to human gene mapping. The first genetic linkage map was created in 1911 by using DNA genetic markers that had been recently sequenced in Drosophila. Disease-causing genes can be located by using DNA genetic markers. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPS) are typically identified with the aid of restriction enzymes that cut specific sequences of DNA.

Biology: The Dynamic Science (MindTap Course List)

4th Edition

ISBN:9781305389892

Author:Peter J. Russell, Paul E. Hertz, Beverly McMillan

Publisher:Peter J. Russell, Paul E. Hertz, Beverly McMillan

Chapter18: Dna Technologies: Making And Using Genetically Altered Organisms, And Other Applications

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1ITD: You learned in the chapter that an STR locus is a locus where alleles differ in the number of copies...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

You learned in the chapter that an STR locus is a locus where alleles differ in the number of copies of a short, tandemly repeated DNA sequence. PCR is used to determine the number of alleles present, as shown by the size of the DNA fragment amplified. In the Figure below are the results of PCR analysis for STR alleles at a locus where the repeat unit length is 9 bp, and alleles are known that have 5 to 11 copies of the repeat. Given the STR alleles present in the adults, state whether each of the four juveniles could or could not be an off-spring of those two adults. Explain your answers.
Can DNA profiling identify the source of a sample with absolute certainty? Because any two human genomes differ at about 3 million sites, no two persons (except identical twins) have the same DNA sequence. Unique identification with DNA profiling is therefore possible if enough sites of variation are examined. However, the systems used today examine only a few sites of variation. Nonetheless, even with todays technology, which uses three to five loci, a match between two DNA patterns can be considered strong evidence that the two samples came from the same source. DNA profiling in criminal cases has been a useful tool in establishing both guilt and innocence. Originally, DNA databases contained only the profiles of convicted felons. Over time, however, law enforcement agencies have expanded the collection and use of DNA profiles, and these new policies are causing controversies, once again illustrating how the availability and use of genetic technology is often ahead of consensus on how and when this technology should be used. One of these new policies is postarrest DNA collection. At this writing, 18 U.S. states as well as the federal government allow the collection of DNA samples after an arrest but before conviction. These profiles become part of the states DNA database, which is often searched for evidence in cold cases. Courts across the country have ruled for and against the use of such samples. In 2012, the Maryland Court of Appeals ruled that the collection of DNA samples from someone who has been arrested but not convicted is unconstitutional and violates an individuals right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure. The case began when a DNA sample was taken from Alonzo Jay King, Jr., who was arrested in 2009 for assault. In a database search, the DNA profile matched that taken from a 2003 unsolved rape. Based on the results of the database search, the man was sentenced to life in prison. The rape conviction was reversed, and the case was sent back to a lower court. As a result, some 16,000 DNA profiles collected postarrest but preconviction since 2009 cannot be used pending appeal of this decision. Before the court decision, postarrest DNA profiles were used in 65 arrests that resulted in 34 convictions, with an additional 12 cases pending. Supporters of postarrest DNA profiling claim that taking a DNA sample by a cheek swab is noninvasive and no different from taking someones fingerprints. Opponents claim that because DNA samples can be used to determine much more than a DNA profile, they are a threat to privacy, and that because minorities are more likely to be arrested, the practice is discriminatory. What if you learned that law enforcement officials were saving the DNA sample for use in tests that might be developed in the future?
Can DNA profiling identify the source of a sample with absolute certainty? Because any two human genomes differ at about 3 million sites, no two persons (except identical twins) have the same DNA sequence. Unique identification with DNA profiling is therefore possible if enough sites of variation are examined. However, the systems used today examine only a few sites of variation. Nonetheless, even with todays technology, which uses three to five loci, a match between two DNA patterns can be considered strong evidence that the two samples came from the same source. DNA profiling in criminal cases has been a useful tool in establishing both guilt and innocence. Originally, DNA databases contained only the profiles of convicted felons. Over time, however, law enforcement agencies have expanded the collection and use of DNA profiles, and these new policies are causing controversies, once again illustrating how the availability and use of genetic technology is often ahead of consensus on how and when this technology should be used. One of these new policies is postarrest DNA collection. At this writing, 18 U.S. states as well as the federal government allow the collection of DNA samples after an arrest but before conviction. These profiles become part of the states DNA database, which is often searched for evidence in cold cases. Courts across the country have ruled for and against the use of such samples. In 2012, the Maryland Court of Appeals ruled that the collection of DNA samples from someone who has been arrested but not convicted is unconstitutional and violates an individuals right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure. The case began when a DNA sample was taken from Alonzo Jay King, Jr., who was arrested in 2009 for assault. In a database search, the DNA profile matched that taken from a 2003 unsolved rape. Based on the results of the database search, the man was sentenced to life in prison. The rape conviction was reversed, and the case was sent back to a lower court. As a result, some 16,000 DNA profiles collected postarrest but preconviction since 2009 cannot be used pending appeal of this decision. Before the court decision, postarrest DNA profiles were used in 65 arrests that resulted in 34 convictions, with an additional 12 cases pending. Supporters of postarrest DNA profiling claim that taking a DNA sample by a cheek swab is noninvasive and no different from taking someones fingerprints. Opponents claim that because DNA samples can be used to determine much more than a DNA profile, they are a threat to privacy, and that because minorities are more likely to be arrested, the practice is discriminatory. Would you object if you were arrested for a minor offense, such as a traffic violation, and ordered to provide a DNA sample?
Can DNA profiling identify the source of a sample with absolute certainty? Because any two human genomes differ at about 3 million sites, no two persons (except identical twins) have the same DNA sequence. Unique identification with DNA profiling is therefore possible if enough sites of variation are examined. However, the systems used today examine only a few sites of variation. Nonetheless, even with todays technology, which uses three to five loci, a match between two DNA patterns can be considered strong evidence that the two samples came from the same source. DNA profiling in criminal cases has been a useful tool in establishing both guilt and innocence. Originally, DNA databases contained only the profiles of convicted felons. Over time, however, law enforcement agencies have expanded the collection and use of DNA profiles, and these new policies are causing controversies, once again illustrating how the availability and use of genetic technology is often ahead of consensus on how and when this technology should be used. One of these new policies is postarrest DNA collection. At this writing, 18 U.S. states as well as the federal government allow the collection of DNA samples after an arrest but before conviction. These profiles become part of the states DNA database, which is often searched for evidence in cold cases. Courts across the country have ruled for and against the use of such samples. In 2012, the Maryland Court of Appeals ruled that the collection of DNA samples from someone who has been arrested but not convicted is unconstitutional and violates an individuals right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure. The case began when a DNA sample was taken from Alonzo Jay King, Jr., who was arrested in 2009 for assault. In a database search, the DNA profile matched that taken from a 2003 unsolved rape. Based on the results of the database search, the man was sentenced to life in prison. The rape conviction was reversed, and the case was sent back to a lower court. As a result, some 16,000 DNA profiles collected postarrest but preconviction since 2009 cannot be used pending appeal of this decision. Before the court decision, postarrest DNA profiles were used in 65 arrests that resulted in 34 convictions, with an additional 12 cases pending. Supporters of postarrest DNA profiling claim that taking a DNA sample by a cheek swab is noninvasive and no different from taking someones fingerprints. Opponents claim that because DNA samples can be used to determine much more than a DNA profile, they are a threat to privacy, and that because minorities are more likely to be arrested, the practice is discriminatory. What are your thoughts on the collection and use of postarrest DNA profiles?
The technique known as DNA sequencing enables researchers to determine the DNA sequence of genes. Wouldthis technique be used primarily by transmission geneticists, molecular geneticists, or population geneticists?
Traditional gene mapping has been applied successfully to a variety of organisms including yeast, fungi, maize, and Drosophila. However, human gene mapping has only recently shared a similar spotlight. What factors have delayed the application of traditional gene-mapping techniques in humans?
Our lives are surrounded byBig Data. Enormous quantitiesof personal informationare stored on private and public databases,revealing our purchasing preferences,search engine histories, social contacts,and even GPS locations.Perhaps the most personal of all BigData entries are genome sequences.Tens of thousands of individuals arenow donating DNA for whole-genomesequencing—by both private genesequencingcompanies and public researchprojects. Most people who donatetheir DNA for sequence analysis do sowith little concern. After all, what consequencescould possibly come fromaccess to gigabytes of As, Cs, Ts, and Gs?Surprisingly, the answer is—quite a lot.One of the first inklings of geneticprivacy problems arose in 2005, whena 15-year-old boy named Ryan Kramertracked down his anonymous spermdonorfather using his own Y chromosomesequence data and the Internet.Ryan submitted a DNA sample to a genealogycompany that generates Y chromosomeprofiles and puts people intocontact with others who share…
Some critics have warned that the use of gene therapy to correct genetic disorders will affect the course of human evolution. Evaluate this criticism in light of what you know about population genetics and evolution, distinguishing between somatic gene therapy and germ-line gene therapy.
which of the following statements about genome-wide association studies (GWAS) is correct? A) involves scanning the genomes of thousands of unrelated individuals with a particular mutation and comparing them with the genomes of individuals who do not have the mutation. B) involves scanning the genomes of thousands of unrelated individuals with a particular disease and comparing them with the genomes of individuals who do not have the disease C) attempt to identify genes that influence mutation risk D) attempt to identify genes that influence disease risk E) involves scanning the genomes of thousands of unrelated individuals with a particular disease and comparing them with the genomes of individuals who do not have the disease and GWAS attempt to identify genes that influence disease risk
DNA sequencing technology has been around since the late 1970s. Why didsequencing whole genomes present a challenge?
Please answer fast Which of the following defines DNA barcoding? (more than one answer may be correct). Please explain your answer(s). A) uses the DNA sequence of a specific fragment of DNA to identify species B) uses microsatellite allele frequences to estimate Ne C) uses whole genome sequences to identify markers under selection D) uses SNPs and a PCA to display population-level relationships E) uses SNPs and a PCA to display individual-level relationships
Which goals of the Human Genome Project do you think are themost important? Why? Discuss the types of ethical problems thatmight arise as a result of identifying all of our genes.