Give the point of view of the classical economists on economic development. Explain the pros and cons.

Macroeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Course List)
16th Edition
ISBN:9781305506756
Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Chapter17: Institutions, Policies, And Cross-country Differences In Income And Growth
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 8CQ
icon
Related questions
Question

Give the point of view of the classical economists on economic development. Explain the pros and cons.

In 1776, Adam Smith ([1776] 1936) published his treatise, An Inquiry into Nature and Causes of the
Wealth of Nations , which was taken by many to be a theory of economic growth. Smith, however,
was clearly concerned with economic development. The classical school of economic thought,
predominantly modeled after Smith, is largely geared toward understanding and explaining economic
development. Smith presented a supply driven model of growth, where output was related to labor,
land, and capital. Thus, economic growth, which is the increase in output, was related to population
growth, investment, land growth, and increases in productivity. According to Smith, society was
dependent on the economy's ability to sustain its increasing workforce. Investment was dependent on
the rate of savings. Land growth was dependent on the ability to acquire more land (through
conquest) or on the increase in the productivity of existing land. He also believed in the division or
specialization of labor as a key factor in economic growth, enhanced by improved machinery and
international trade. Smith argued that increased specialization would increase productivity and
reduce per-unit costs, leading to increasing returns. However, he also thought that, in spite of
increasing returns, such an economy would ultimately stagnate, wherein capital accumulation and
population growth will approach zero. Smith believed that the extension of markets was the key to
economic growth largely through the role that market extension played in creating greater
specialization. Smith emphasized specialization as leading to greater productivity. He also argued
that the mercantilist system was holding back England by limiting its market and, hence, limiting the
division of labor. The mercantilist system, while it promoted the expansion of markets beyond the
more limited markets of feudalism, restricted and regulated markets in many ways that Smith found
objectionable.
Transcribed Image Text:In 1776, Adam Smith ([1776] 1936) published his treatise, An Inquiry into Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations , which was taken by many to be a theory of economic growth. Smith, however, was clearly concerned with economic development. The classical school of economic thought, predominantly modeled after Smith, is largely geared toward understanding and explaining economic development. Smith presented a supply driven model of growth, where output was related to labor, land, and capital. Thus, economic growth, which is the increase in output, was related to population growth, investment, land growth, and increases in productivity. According to Smith, society was dependent on the economy's ability to sustain its increasing workforce. Investment was dependent on the rate of savings. Land growth was dependent on the ability to acquire more land (through conquest) or on the increase in the productivity of existing land. He also believed in the division or specialization of labor as a key factor in economic growth, enhanced by improved machinery and international trade. Smith argued that increased specialization would increase productivity and reduce per-unit costs, leading to increasing returns. However, he also thought that, in spite of increasing returns, such an economy would ultimately stagnate, wherein capital accumulation and population growth will approach zero. Smith believed that the extension of markets was the key to economic growth largely through the role that market extension played in creating greater specialization. Smith emphasized specialization as leading to greater productivity. He also argued that the mercantilist system was holding back England by limiting its market and, hence, limiting the division of labor. The mercantilist system, while it promoted the expansion of markets beyond the more limited markets of feudalism, restricted and regulated markets in many ways that Smith found objectionable.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Classical Theory of Inflation
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Macroeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa…
Macroeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa…
Economics
ISBN:
9781305506756
Author:
James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Economics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou…
Economics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou…
Economics
ISBN:
9781305506725
Author:
James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Exploring Economics
Exploring Economics
Economics
ISBN:
9781544336329
Author:
Robert L. Sexton
Publisher:
SAGE Publications, Inc
Economics:
Economics:
Economics
ISBN:
9781285859460
Author:
BOYES, William
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Microeconomics: Principles & Policy
Microeconomics: Principles & Policy
Economics
ISBN:
9781337794992
Author:
William J. Baumol, Alan S. Blinder, John L. Solow
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Macroeconomics
Macroeconomics
Economics
ISBN:
9781337617390
Author:
Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:
Cengage Learning