21.6 Heat resistance in rice, continued. Excercise 21.2 investigated a genetic model oh heat resistance in rice plants. Software gives a P-value of 0.397. Interpret this result. Can you conclude that the distribution of heat-resistant phenotypes in F2 follows a dominant-recessive model (75%~ 25%)? EXAMPLE 21.2Righting behavior of aphidsPea aphids (Acyrthosiphon pisum) are small, wingless, sap-sucking insects that liveon plants. They evade predators (such as ladybugs) by dropping off. A study exam-ined the mechanism of aphid drops. Researchers hung live aphids upside downfrom delicate tweezers and then released them. The videotaped drops showed that19 of the 20 aphids landed on their legs.? Is this evidence that live aphids landright side up (on their legs) more often than chance alone would predict? side. Therefore, the relevant null hypothesis isTe this scenario, aphids can land either on their legs or on their back. If chancevas at work, we would expect aphids to be equally likely to land on either1and Pback =1Ho: Plegs =The alternative hypothesis is simply that Ho is not true.The goodness-of-fit test can assess a variety of null hypotheses that reflecthow we expect one categorical variable to be distributed in the target popula-tion. Because the variable is categorical, the parameters in Ho are populationproportions for the k possible outcomes (levels) making up the variable. The onlyconstraint on the null hypothesis for a goodness-of-fit test is that these k propor-tions sum to 1, so that Ho accounts for all possible outcomes. In Example 21.1the variable seed color had three possible outcomes (black, brown, pale) and thethree population proportions in Ho were 12/16, 3/16, and 1/16, which sum to 1.In Example 21.2 the variable landing side had only two possible outcomes (legs,back) and the two population proportions in Ho were 1/2 and 1/2.

Question

21.6  Heat resistance in rice, continued. Excercise 21.2 investigated a genetic model oh heat resistance in rice plants. Software gives a P-value of 0.397. Interpret this result. Can you conclude that the distribution of heat-resistant phenotypes in F2 follows a dominant-recessive model (75%~ 25%)? EXAMPLE 21.2Righting behavior of aphidsPea aphids (Acyrthosiphon pisum) are small, wingless, sap-sucking insects that liveon plants. They evade predators (such as ladybugs) by dropping off. A study exam-ined the mechanism of aphid drops. Researchers hung live aphids upside downfrom delicate tweezers and then released them. The videotaped drops showed that19 of the 20 aphids landed on their legs.? Is this evidence that live aphids landright side up (on their legs) more often than chance alone would predict? side. Therefore, the relevant null hypothesis isTe this scenario, aphids can land either on their legs or on their back. If chancevas at work, we would expect aphids to be equally likely to land on either1and Pback =1Ho: Plegs =The alternative hypothesis is simply that Ho is not true.The goodness-of-fit test can assess a variety of null hypotheses that reflecthow we expect one categorical variable to be distributed in the target popula-tion. Because the variable is categorical, the parameters in Ho are populationproportions for the k possible outcomes (levels) making up the variable. The onlyconstraint on the null hypothesis for a goodness-of-fit test is that these k propor-tions sum to 1, so that Ho accounts for all possible outcomes. In Example 21.1the variable seed color had three possible outcomes (black, brown, pale) and thethree population proportions in Ho were 12/16, 3/16, and 1/16, which sum to 1.In Example 21.2 the variable landing side had only two possible outcomes (legs,back) and the two population proportions in Ho were 1/2 and 1/2.

Accepted Answer

GivenA genetic model is investigated on heat resistance in rice plants.
The p value of the study is…