In a study of high school students at least 16 years of age, researchers obtained survey results summarized in the accompanying table. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim of independence between texting while driving and driving when drinking alcohol. Are those two risky behaviors independent of each other? Click the icon to view the table of survey results. Determine the null and alternative hypotheses. Ho: Determine the test statistic. X= |(Round to two decimal places as needed.) Determine the P-value of the test statistic. P-value =| (Round to three decimal places as needed.) Do the results suggest that texting while driving and driving while drinking are related? OA. Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that texting while driving happens 95% of the time when driving while drinking alcohol. O B. Fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence at a 0.05 significance level to warrant rejection of the claim of independence between texting while driving and driving while drinking alcohol. Those two risky behaviors are not related. O C. Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence at a 0.05 significance level to warrant rejection of the claim of independence between texting while driving and driving while drinking alcohol. Those two risky behaviors appear to be somehow related. O D. Fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that texting while driving happens 95% of the time when driving while drinking alcohol. Survey results Drove When Drinking Alcohol? No Yes Texted While Driving 745 3063 No Texting While Driving 155 4576

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question

Need help with statistics homework question asap! 3

In a study of high school students at least 16 years of age, researchers obtained survey results summarized in the accompanying table, Use a 0.05
significance level to test the claim of independence between texting while driving and driving when drinking alcohol. Are those two risky behaviors
independent of each other?
Click the icon to view the table of survey results.
Determine the null and alternative hypotheses.
Ho-
Determine the test statistic.
X= (Round to two decimal places as needed.)
Determine the P-value of the test statistic.
P-value =
(Round to three decimal places as needed.)
Do the results suggest that texting while driving and driving while drinking are related?
O A. Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that texting while driving happens 95% of the time when
driving while drinking alcohol.
O B. Fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence at a 0.05 significance level to warrant rejection of the claim of independence
between texting while driving and driving while drinking alcohol. Those two risky behaviors are not related.
O c. Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence at a 0.05 significance level to warrant rejection of the claim of independence between
texting while driving and driving while drinking alcohol. Those two risky behaviors appear to be somehow related.
O D. Fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that texting while driving happens 95% of the
time when driving while drinking alcohol.
Survey results
Drove When Drinking Alcohol?
No
Yes
745
3063
Texted While Driving
No Texting While Driving
155
4576
1.
Transcribed Image Text:In a study of high school students at least 16 years of age, researchers obtained survey results summarized in the accompanying table, Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim of independence between texting while driving and driving when drinking alcohol. Are those two risky behaviors independent of each other? Click the icon to view the table of survey results. Determine the null and alternative hypotheses. Ho- Determine the test statistic. X= (Round to two decimal places as needed.) Determine the P-value of the test statistic. P-value = (Round to three decimal places as needed.) Do the results suggest that texting while driving and driving while drinking are related? O A. Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that texting while driving happens 95% of the time when driving while drinking alcohol. O B. Fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence at a 0.05 significance level to warrant rejection of the claim of independence between texting while driving and driving while drinking alcohol. Those two risky behaviors are not related. O c. Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence at a 0.05 significance level to warrant rejection of the claim of independence between texting while driving and driving while drinking alcohol. Those two risky behaviors appear to be somehow related. O D. Fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that texting while driving happens 95% of the time when driving while drinking alcohol. Survey results Drove When Drinking Alcohol? No Yes 745 3063 Texted While Driving No Texting While Driving 155 4576 1.
In a study of high school students at least 16 years of age, researchers obtained survey results summarized in the accompanying table. Use a 0.05
significance level to test the claim of independence between texting while driving and driving when drinking alcohol. Are those two risky behaviors
independent of each other?
Click the icon to view the table of survey results.
Determine the null and alternative hypotheses.
Ho
Dete
Texting while driving is independent of all other risky behaviors.
Dete
Texting while driving and other risky behaviors are dependent.
P-ve
Do t
Texting while driving is independent of driving while drinking alcohol.
Texting while driving and driving while drinking alcohol are dependent.
ne claim that texting while driving happens 95% of the time when
O B. Fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence at a 0.05 significance level to warrant rejection of the claim of independence
between texting while driving and driving while drinking alcohol. Those two risky behaviors are not related,
Oc Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence at a 0.05 significance level to warrant rejection of the claim of independence between
texting while driving and driving while drinking alcohol. Those two risky behaviors appear to be somehow related.
O D. Fail to reject the null hypothesis There is not sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that texting while driving happens 05% of the
time when drving while drinking alcohol.
Survey results
Drove When Drinking Alcohol?
Yes
745
155
No
3063
4576
Texted While Driving
No Texting While Driving
1.
Transcribed Image Text:In a study of high school students at least 16 years of age, researchers obtained survey results summarized in the accompanying table. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim of independence between texting while driving and driving when drinking alcohol. Are those two risky behaviors independent of each other? Click the icon to view the table of survey results. Determine the null and alternative hypotheses. Ho Dete Texting while driving is independent of all other risky behaviors. Dete Texting while driving and other risky behaviors are dependent. P-ve Do t Texting while driving is independent of driving while drinking alcohol. Texting while driving and driving while drinking alcohol are dependent. ne claim that texting while driving happens 95% of the time when O B. Fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence at a 0.05 significance level to warrant rejection of the claim of independence between texting while driving and driving while drinking alcohol. Those two risky behaviors are not related, Oc Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence at a 0.05 significance level to warrant rejection of the claim of independence between texting while driving and driving while drinking alcohol. Those two risky behaviors appear to be somehow related. O D. Fail to reject the null hypothesis There is not sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that texting while driving happens 05% of the time when drving while drinking alcohol. Survey results Drove When Drinking Alcohol? Yes 745 155 No 3063 4576 Texted While Driving No Texting While Driving 1.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps with 4 images

Blurred answer
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman