It describes a game of Chicken. 2 rebellious Teen drivers (Spike and Henry) face each other on a deserted stretch of highway, and start speeding towards each other. Eac driver has 2 strategies>>Swerve or Don't Swerve. The Payoff matrix puts relative point values on the various outcomes (each driver woul like to be the one that doesn't swerve while the other does). By looking at the Payoff matrix, does either player have a Dominant strategy? Spike Swerve Don't Swerve D1: -10 D1: +30 Swerve D2: -10 D2:-15 Henry D1: -50 Don't D1:-15 Swerve D2: +30 D2: -50 O Neither Player has a Dominant Strategy in this game O Both Players have a Dominant strategy to "Don't Swerve O Spike has Dominant Strategy "Swerve", Henry has Dominant Strategy "Don't Swerve O Both Players have a Dominant strategy to "Swerve"

It describes a game of Chicken. 2 rebellious Teen drivers (Spike and Henry) face each other on a deserted stretch of highway, and start speeding towards each other. Eac driver has 2 strategies>>Swerve or Don't Swerve. The Payoff matrix puts relative point values on the various outcomes (each driver woul like to be the one that doesn't swerve while the other does). By looking at the Payoff matrix, does either player have a Dominant strategy? Spike Swerve Don't Swerve D1: -10 D1: +30 Swerve D2: -10 D2:-15 Henry D1: -50 Don't D1:-15 Swerve D2: +30 D2: -50 O Neither Player has a Dominant Strategy in this game O Both Players have a Dominant strategy to "Don't Swerve O Spike has Dominant Strategy "Swerve", Henry has Dominant Strategy "Don't Swerve O Both Players have a Dominant strategy to "Swerve"

Exploring Economics

8th Edition

ISBN:9781544336329

Author:Robert L. Sexton

Publisher:Robert L. Sexton

Chapter15: Oligopoly And Strategic Behavior

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 17P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Use a matrix to model a two-player game of rock-paper-scissors with payoff of 1 if you win, -1 if you lose, and 0 if you tie. In this game, how many pure-strategies Nash equilibria exist?
Use the following payoff matrix for a one-shot game to answer the accompanying questions. a. Determine the Nash equilibrium outcomes that arise if the players make decisions independently, simultaneously, and without any communication. Which of these outcomes would you consider most likely? Explain. b. Suppose player 1 is permitted to “communicate” by uttering one syllable before the players simultaneously and independently make their decisions. What should player 1 utter, and what outcome do you think would occur as a result? c. Suppose player 2 can choose its strategy before player 1, that player 1 observes player 2’s choice before making her decision, and that this move structure is known by both players. What outcome would you expect? Explain.
Suppose that Kim and Nene are both in the public eye. They get offers to sell secrets of the other to tabloids. If both keep the secrets, they are both better off than if they get exposed. If only one is exposed, the other person is better off than if no one was exposed. Their payoffs from each option are given in the payoff matrix. Suppose that Nene and Kim play the game over four television seasons, where each season is a new game. Consider the scenarios. Remember, a tit‑for‑tat strategy is one where the person starts by cooperating and then plays whatever strategy the other firm played last. Over four seasons, how much will Nene make if she and Kim both play tit‑for‑tat? $ Over four seasons, how much does Nene make if she always exposes and Kim plays tit‑for‑tat? $ Over four seasons, how much will Nene make if she plays a tit‑for‑tat strategy and Kim always exposes? $ Over four seasons, how much will Nene make if she and…
Consider the following static, single-shot game played between two cyclists, Chico and Loco, who find themselves riding towards each other down a narrow lane. Chico wants to pass by safely, and he can only do this by cycling on the opposite side of the lane to Loco. So, he has two options: to cycle on the Right of the lane, or to cycle on the Left. Loco meanwhile is having a bad day and wants to crash into Chico, and the way he can achieve this is by cycling on the same side of the lane as Chico. So again, he has two options: to cycle on the Right of the lane, or to cycle on the Left. He does not care at all about hurting himself if they collide. (c) By constructing the best response lines of both players, identify all Nash equilibrium outcomes in the above game i.e., in pure and mixed strategies. (d) Provide an intuitive interpretation of the equilibrium outcome(s) identified in part (c) above.
Use the following payoff matrix for a one-shot game to answer the accompanying questions. Player 2 Strategy X Y Player 1 A 50, 50 -110, 6 B 6, -110 26, 26 a. Determine the Nash equilibrium outcomes that arise if the players make decisions independently, simultaneously, and without any communication.check all that apply (26,26) (50,50) (-110,6) (6,-110) Which of these outcomes would you consider most likely?multiple choice 1 (-110,6) (50,50) (6,-110) (26,26) b. Suppose player 1 is permitted to “communicate” by uttering one syllable before the players simultaneously and independently make their decisions. What should player 1 utter?multiple choice 2 B A What outcome do you think would occur as a result?multiple choice 3 (26,26) (50,50) (-110,6) (6,-110) c. Suppose player 2 can choose its strategy before player 1, that player 1 observes player 2’s choice before making her decision, and that this move…
Use the following payoff matrix for a one-shot game to answer the accompanying questions. A 5,5 0, -200 B -200, 0 20, 20 Determine the Nash equilibrium outcomes that arise if the players make decisions independently, simultaneously, and without any communication. Which of these outcomes would you consider most likely? Explain. Suppose player 1 is permitted to “communicate” by uttering one syllable before the players simultaneously and independently make their decisions. What should player 1 utter, and what outcome do you think would occur as a result?
Suppose two players play a two-period repeated game, where the stage game is the normal-form game shown below. Is there a subgame perfect Nash equilibrium in which the players select (A, X) in the first period? If so, fully describe such equilibrium. If not, explain why not. Player 1 has choice A, B; Player 2 has choice X, Y, Z. Payoff: (A,X)-(5,7), (A,Y)-(2,4), (A,Z)-(3,8), (B,X)-(1,4), (B,Y)-(3,5), (B,Z)-(1,4)
Suppose that Teresa and Caroline are both in the public eye. They get offers to sell secrets of the other to tabloids. If both keep the secrets, they are both better off than if they get exposed. If only one is exposed, the other person is better off than if no one was exposed. Their payoffs from each option are given in the payoff matrix. Suppose that Caroline and Teresa play the game over four television seasons, where each season is a new game. Consider the scenarios. Remember, a tit‑for‑tat strategy is one where the person starts by cooperating and then plays whatever strategy the other firm played last. Over four seasons, how much will Caroline make if she plays a tit‑for‑tat strategy and Teresa always exposes? $_______ Over four seasons, how much will Caroline make if she and Teresa both always expose? $_________ Does Caroline have a dominant strategy when she and Teresa play for four seasons? No, there is no dominant strategy…
A payoff matrix is shown below. With the payoffs in each field indicated in the form (Player 1’s payoff, Player 2’s payoff). Player 2 Left Right Player 1 Up ($1, $1) ($2, $4) Down ($7, $8) ($3, $3) Which of the following is true? The only Nash Equilibrium is Player 1 playing ‘Up’ and Player 2 playing ‘Right’. The only Nash Equilibrium is Player 1 playing ‘Down’ and Player 2 playing ‘Left’. The only Nash Equilibrium is Player 1 playing ‘Down’ and Player 2 playing ‘Right’. None of the other answers provided are true.
Use the following payoff matrix for a one-shot game to answer the accompanying questions. Player 2 Strategy X Y Player 1 A 30, 30 16, -50 B -50, 16 50, 50 A. Determine the Nash equilibrium outcomes that arise if the players make decisions independently, simultaneously, and without any communication. check all that apply (16, −50) (−50, 16) (30, 30) (50, 50) Which of these outcomes would you consider most likely? multiple choice (16, −50) (50, 50) (−50, 16) (30, 30) B. Suppose player 1 is permitted to “communicate” by uttering one syllable before the players simultaneously and independently make their decisions. What should player 1 utter? multiple choice A or B What outcome do you think would occur as a result? multiple choice (−50, 16) (16, −50) (30, 30) (50, 50) c. Suppose player 2 can choose its strategy before player 1, that player 1 observes player 2’s choice before making her decision, and that this move structure is…
In the collusion game, we found that collusion was only sustainable in the infinite horizon repeated game. One Nash Equilbrium of that game can be found when all players play a “grim trigger” strategy, where they collude until an opponent chooses to compete, and then compete for all future rounds as a punishment. In such a game, if the one period bonus that comes from competing is low enough, firms always collude and the punishment is never triggered. However, let’s think a little deeper about this Nash Equilibrium. Is the punishment (vowing to compete forever after one deviates) realistic, especially if firms can communicate freely? Why or why not? (Hint: Is a grim trigger Nash Equilibrium a Subgame Perfect Nash Equilibrium? What kinds of Nash Equilibria does Subgame Perfection rule out in sequential games?)
(A) Two California teenagers Bill and Ted are playing Chicken. Bill drives his hot rod south down a one-lane road, and Ted drives his hot rod north along the same road. Each has two strategies: Stay or Swerve. If one player chooses Swerve he loses face; if both swerve, they both lose face. However, if they both choose Stay, they are both killed. The payoffs for the game of Chicken are given in the table below. Bill is the row player and Ted is the column player. Stay Swerve Stay -3, -3 2, 0 Swerve 0, 2 1, 1 (i) Find all pure strategy Nash equilibria. (ii) Find the mixed strategy Nash equilibrium. (iii) What is the probability that both teenagers will survive? Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.