Jones TV and Smith TV are the only two stores in your town that sell flat panel TV sets. First, Joneswill choose whether to charge high prices or low prices. Smith will see Jones's decision and thenchoose high or low prices. If they both choose High, each earns $10,000. If they both choose Low,each earns $8,000. If one chooses High and the other chooses Low, the one that chose High earns$6,000 and the one that chose Low earns $14,000.a. Draw the game tree. Use backward induction to solve this game.b. Suppose Smith goes to Jones and promises to choose High if Jones chooses High. Is this acredible promise?c. Now suppose Jones starts a new policy that says it will always match or beat Smith's price. Itadvertises the new policy heavily and so must choose Low if Smith chooses Low. So the gamenow has the following structure. First, Jones chooses High or Low. Second, Smith chooses Highor Low. Third, if Jones has chosen High and Smith has chosen Low, Jones meets Smith's priceand chooses Low. Draw the game tree. Use backward induction to solve this game.

a.b. No, because if Jones chooses High, Smith will have the chance to choose Low, which will be…

Answered: Jones TV and Smith TV are the only two…

Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies and Tactics (MindTap Course List)

14th Edition

ISBN:9781305506381

Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris

Publisher:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris

Chapter13: best-practice Tactics: Game Theory

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 3E

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

American Airlines and Braniff Airways are the two airlines operating flights from your region. Suppose that each company can charge either a high price for tickets or a low price. First, American Airlines will choose the price level. Following this, Braniff Airways will observe its competitor’s decision and choose the price level for its tickets. If both of the companies choose High, they earn $25,000 each. If they both choose Low, they earn $18,000 each. If the companies choose different levels of prices, the one choosing the high price will earn $15,000 and the one choosing Low will earn $30,000. a) Draw the game three. b) Solve the game by using backwards induction. c) If Braniff Airlines makes a promise to choose High if American Airlines chooses High, should American Airlines trust this promise? Explain.
Joe and Rebecca are small-town ready-mix concrete duopolists. The market demand function is Qd = 10,000 – 100P, where P is the price of a cubic yard of concrete and Qd is the number of cubic yards demanded per year. Marginal cost is $25 per cubic yard. Suppose that Joe and Rebecca compete in quantities and competition in this market is described by Cournot model. What are Joe and Rebecca’s Nash equilibrium outputs? What is the resulting price? What do they each earn as profit? How does the price compare to the marginal cost? Joe and Rebecca are small-town ready-mix concrete duopolists. The market demand function is Qd = 10,000 – 100P, where P is the price of a cubic yard of concrete and Qd is the number of cubic yards demanded per year. Marginal cost is $25 per cubic yard. Suppose that Joe and Rebecca compete in quantities and competition in this market is described by Cournot model. What are Joe and Rebecca’s Nash equilibrium outputs? What is the resulting price? What do they each…
Consider a situation where two firms, 1 and 2, compete by choosing prices simultaneously. They can either compete (charge a low price) or cooperate (collude, charging a high price). The firms play this competition game repeatedly and indefinitely, using a grim trigger strategy to incentivize cooperation. They use the same interest rate, i , to discount future payoffs. Payoffs are $4,050 when both firms cooperate and $3,600 when they compete. If one firm charge a low price while the other charges a high price, the firm charging the low price gets $7,200, and the other gets zero. Which of the following statements is correct?(a) For any i < 1/7 the firms will cooperate(b) For any i > 1/8 the firms will cooperate(c) For i = 1/9 the firms will be indifferent between cooperating or competing(d) There is no way to sustain cooperation in this scenario
Consider a situation where two firms, 1 and 2, compete by choosing prices simultaneously. Theycan either compete (charge a low price) or cooperate (collude, charging a high price). The firmsplay this competition game repeatedly and indefinitely, using a grim trigger strategy toincentivize cooperation. They use the same interest rate, i, to discount future payoffs. Payoffsare $4,050 when both firms cooperate and $3,600 when they compete. If one firm charge a lowprice while the other charges a high price, the firm charging the low price gets $7,200, and theother gets zero, but now assume there is a 10% chance that aregulatory agency will give both firms a $1,500 fine in each period if they are caught colluding.Find the condition on the interest rate, i , necessary for sustaining the cooperative equilibrium.Which of the following statements is correct?(a) For any i < 1/7 the firms will cooperate.(b) For any i < 1/11 the firms will cooperate.(c) For any i > 1/11 the firms will…
The Tampa Tribune and the St. Petersburg Times compete for readers in the Tampa Bay market for newspapers. Recently, both newspapers considered changing the prices they charge for their Sunday editions. Suppose they considered the following payoff table for making a simultaneous decision to charge either a low price of $0.50 or a high price of $1.00. Tampa’s profits are shown in regular type. St. Petersburg’s profits are shown in bold. 2. St. Petersburg Times' dominant strategy is ____________ (low price, high price, it has no dominant strategy).
The Tampa Tribune and the St. Petersburg Times compete for readers in the Tampa Bay market for newspapers. Recently, both newspapers considered changing the prices they charge for their Sunday editions. Suppose they considered the following payoff table for making a simultaneous decision to charge either a low price of $0.50 or a high price of $1.00. Tampa’s profits are shown in regular type. St. Petersburg’s profits are shown in bold. 4. St. Petersburg Times' dominated strategy is ____________ (low price, high price, it has no dominant strategy).
Little Kona is a small coffee company that is considering entering a market dominated by Big Brew. Each company's profit depends on whether Little Kona enters and whether Big Brew sets a high price or a low price: True or False: Only Little Kona has a dominant strategy in this game. True or False Which of the following outcomes represent a Nash equilibrium in this case? Check all that apply. Big Brew maintains a high price and Little Kona enters. a.Big Brew maintains a low price and Little Kona enters. b.Big Brew maintains a high price and Little Kona does not enter. c.Big Brew maintains a low price and Little Kona does not enter. Big Brew threatens Little Kona by saying, “If you enter, we're going to set a low price, so you had better stay out.” True or False: Little Kona should not believe the threat. True or False If the two firms could collude and agree on how to split the total profits, what outcome would they…
The Tampa Tribune and the St. Petersburg Times compete for readers in the Tampa Bay market for newspapers. Recently, both newspapers considered changing the prices they charge for their Sunday editions. Suppose they considered the following payoff table for making a simultaneous decision to charge either a low price of $0.50 or a high price of $1.00. Tampa’s profits are shown in regular type. St. Petersburg’s profits are shown in bold. 1. Tampa Tribune's dominant strategy is ____________ (low price, high price, it has no dominant strategy).
Pfizer and a competitor, Astra-Zeneca, are considering developing a new drug for a particular illness at the same time. The illness is relatively rare but the fixed cost of production is very high. In particular, the forecast demand for such a drug is insufficient to cover both firms’ costs. Analyse the interaction between the two firms using game theory. Present a payoff matrix to model the situation and analyse it for Nash equilibrium. What can either of these firms do to make their best, most- preferred outcome more likely?
The Tampa Tribune and the St. Petersburg Times compete for readers in the Tampa Bay market for newspapers. Recently, both newspapers considered changing the prices they charge for their Sunday editions. Suppose they considered the following payoff table for making a simultaneous decision to charge either a low price of $0.50 or a high price of $1.00. Tampa’s profits are shown in regular type. St. Petersburg’s profits are shown in bold. 3. Tampa Tribune's dominated strategy is ____________ (low price, high price, it has no dominant strategy).
Three firms produce identical products and compete in a market where the inverse demand function is P(q1, q2, q3) = 78 − q1− q2− q3. Each has a per-unit cost of 14 and zero fixed cost. They simultaneously choose quantities. In scenario (a), find the Nash equilibrium of this game and let A = firm 2's profit in the Nash equilibrium. In scenario (b), assume that the firms form a cartel, i.e., they act as a monopoly and split the profit evenly. If the total quantity produced by the cartel is Q, then the inverse demand is P(Q) = 78 - Q. Let B = firm 2's profit in the cartel. Calculate the value of A - B and enter your answer in the box below. Please round your answer to 3 decimal places (e.g., write 4/3 as 1.333).
Little Kona is a small coffee company that is considering entering a market dominated by Big Brew. Each company’s profit depends on whether Little Kona enters and whether Big Brew sets a high price or a low price:a. Does either player in this game have a dominant strategy?b. Does your answer to part (a) help you figure out what the other player should do?c. What is the Nash equilibrium? Is there only one?d. Big Brew threatens Little Kona by saying, “If you enter, we’re going to set a low price, so you had better stay out.” Do you think Little Kona should believe the threat? Why or why not?c. If the two firms could collude and agree on how to split the total profits, what outcome would they pick?

SEE MORE QUESTIONS

Recommended textbooks for you

Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an…

Economics

ISBN:

9781305506381

Author:

James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Survey Of Economics

Economics

ISBN:

9781337111522

Author:

Tucker, Irvin B.

Publisher:

Cengage,

Micro Economics For Today

Economics

ISBN:

9781337613064

Author:

Tucker, Irvin B.

Publisher:

Cengage,

Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an…

Economics

ISBN:

9781305506381

Author:

James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Survey Of Economics

Economics

ISBN:

9781337111522

Author:

Tucker, Irvin B.

Publisher:

Cengage,

Micro Economics For Today

Economics

ISBN:

9781337613064

Author:

Tucker, Irvin B.

Publisher:

Cengage,

Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach

Economics

ISBN:

9781337106665

Author:

Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS