Let $P1 be the price you were supposed to find in the previous question, and assume that you observe that the option is selling for a different price, $P2. Which of the following MUST be true? If P1>P2, then you can make an arbitrage, and your arbitrage strategy, among other things, will include borrowing money and selling the stock If P1P2, then you can make an arbitrage, and your arbitrage strategy, among other things, will include short-selling the stock and investing money If P1

Let $P1 be the price you were supposed to find in the previous question, and assume that you observe that the option is selling for a different price, $P2. Which of the following MUST be true? If P1>P2, then you can make an arbitrage, and your arbitrage strategy, among other things, will include borrowing money and selling the stock If P1P2, then you can make an arbitrage, and your arbitrage strategy, among other things, will include short-selling the stock and investing money If P1

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter7: Uncertainty

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 7.7P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

For a given option portfolio, you are long vega (value increases as volatility goes up), and short theta (as time passes your options portfolio loses money). Are you net long or short options? Net long, because as volatility goes up and it increases in value and as time passes you lose value. Net short, because as volatility goes up and it decreases in value and as time passes you increase value. not consistent you are long one and short the other, so can't tell completely independent derivatives, its apples and oranges and no reflection on your portfolio
Suppose Martha earns an of income 400 Birr currently, and her utility function is given by: U(m) = 4m, where m represents income. She has two options: Option 1: to buy a share. If she is successful her income will be 700 Birr and if she is not successful her income will be 100 Birr. Option 2: to do nothing and keep on earning 400 Birr. Assuming that success and failure are equally likely, a) What would be her expected income if she buys the share? b) What would be her expected utility of buying the share? c) Would Martha buy the share? Why? and Is Martha risk averse, risk lover or risk neutral?
A woman with current wealth X has the opportunity to bet an amount on the occurrence of an event that she knows will occur with probability P. If she wagers W, she will received 2W, if the event occur and if it does not. Assume that the Bernoulli utility function takes the form u(x) = with r > 0. How much should she wager? Does her utility function exhibit CARA, DARA, IARA? Alex plays football for a local club in Kumasi. If he does not suffer any injury by the end of the season, he will get a professional contract with Kotoko, which is worth $10,000. If he is injured though, he will get a contract as a fitness coach worth $100. The probability of the injury is 10%. Describe the lottery What is the expected value of this lottery? What is the expected utility of this lottery if u(x) = Assume he could buy insurance at price P that could pay $9,900 in case of injury. What is the highest value of P that makes it worthwhile for Alex to purchase insurance? What is the certainty…
Seung’s utility function is given by U = ln(C), where C is consumption. She makes $30,000 per year and enjoy jumping out of airplanes. There's a 5% chance that in the next year, she will break both legs, incur medical costs of $15,000, and lose an additional $5,000 from missing work. (a) What is Seung’s expected utility without insurance? (b) Suppose Seung can buy insurance that will cover the medical expenses but not the forgone part of her salary. How much would an actuarially fair policy cost, and what is her expected utility if she buys it? (c) Suppose Seung can buy insurance that will cover her medical expenses and forgone salary. How much would such a policy cost if it's actuarially fair, and what is her expected utility if she buys it?
Prospect Y = ($6, 0.25 ; $15, 0.75) If Will's utility of wealth function is given by u(x)=x0.25, what is the value of CE(Y) for Will? (In other words, what is Will's certainty equivalent for prospect Y?) (The certainty equivalent represents the maximum amount a person would be willing to pay to acquire a risky prospect, and equivalently, the lowest price for which they would be willing to sell a risky prospect if they already owned it) (Note: The answer may not be a whole number; please round to the nearest hundredth) (Note: The numbers may change between questions, so read carefully)
Seung's utility function is given by U - C^(1/2), where C is consumption and C^(1/2) is the square root of consumption. She makes $50,625 per year and enjoys jumping out of airplanes. There's a 5% chance that in the next year, she will break both legs, incur medical costs of $30,000, and lose an additional $5,000 from missing work. a. What is Seung's expected utility without insurance? b. Suppose Seung can buy insurance that will cover the medical expenses but not the forgone part of her salary. How much would an actuarially fair policy cost, and what is the expected utility if she buys it? Policy cost: $___ Expected utility: ___ c. Suppose Seung can buy insurance that will cover her medical expenses and foregone salary. How much would such a policy cost if it's actuarially fair, and what is her expected utility if she buys it? Policy cost: $___ Expected Utility: ___
Suppose you must choose between the two prospects, (40,000, 0.025) or (1,000): The prospect of winning 40,000 with a probability of 2.5% or winning 1,000 with certainty. Suppose, too, that the following three graphs represent your utility function (according to expected utility theory) and your weighting and value scales (according to prospect theory). Finally, suppose that your current wealth is 20,000. d. Based on prospect theory, which prospect would you choose? Why? e. Why is your decision different under the two theories? (Hint: what is one of the common human traits that prospect theory captures that expected utility theory cannot?)
You are in the market for a used car. At a used carlot, you know that the Blue Book value of the car youare looking at is between $15,000 and $19,000. Ifyou believe the dealer knows as much about the caras you do, how much are you willing to pay? Why?Assume that you care only about the expected valueof the car you will buy and that the car values aresymmetrically distributed.23. Refer to Problem 22. Now you believe the dealerknows more about the car than you do. How muchare you willing to pay? Why? How can this asymmetric information problem be resolved in a competitivemarket?
INV 1 5aiv Suppose that you have the following utility function: U=E(r) – ½ Aσ2 and A=3 Suppose that you have $10 million to invest for one year and you want to invest that money into ETFs tracking the S&P 500 (US) and S&P/TSX 60 (Canada) index, which are often used as proxies for the US and Canadian stock markets, respectively, and the Canadian one-year T-bill. Assume that the interest rate of the one-year T-bill is 0.35% per annum. You have found two ETFs that you are interested in. From a set of their historical data between 2001 and 2019, you have estimated the annual expected returns, standard deviations, and covariance as follows: ETFUS : E(r)= 0.070584 standard deviation = 0.173687 ETFCDA : E(r)= 0.073763 standard deviation = 0.16816 Covariance between ETFUS and ETFCDA = 0.02397 What is the standard deviation for ETFCDA?
Jamal has a utility function U = W1/2, where W is his wealth in millions of dollars and U is the utility he obtains from that wealth. In the final stage of a game show, the host offers Jamal a choice between (A) $4 million for sure, or (B) a gamble that pays $1 million with probability 0.6 and $9 million with probability 0.4. (1) Does A or B offer Jamal a higher expected utility? Explain your reasoning with calculations. (2) Should Jamal pick A or B? Why? I would like help with the unanswered last parts of the questions.
Are derivatives similar to insurance in that both have an indefinite life spans, allow for the transfer of risk from one party to another or allow for the transformation of the underlying risk itself? First explain why one or more of the options above are correct. Secondly explain why, if any of the remaining options are incorrect. Your justification/s should be one sentence for each of the points above, in bullet point format.
Angie owns an endive farm that will be worth $90,000 or $0 with equal probability. Her Bernouilli utility function is u(w) =√w, where w is her wealth level (sum of initial wealth and the worth of the endive farm). 1. Suppose her firm is the only asset she has, that is, she has no initial wealth. What is the lowest price P at which she will agree to sell her endive farm before she knows how much it will be worth? 2. Redo part (1) assuming that she has $160,000 in her bank safe. 3. Compare and discuss your results in parts (1) and (2). What relationship can you find between Angie’s initial wealth level (zero versus $160,000) and her risk aversion?