Market power is quite common. Many industries only have a few producers such that each producer has some market power. The problem faced by these firms is how to use their market power most effectively. We need to understand how firms with market power set prices. The basic objective of any pricing strategy is to capture consumer surplus and convert it to additional profit for the firm. clearly distinguish between the three broads forms of price discrimination and how it is applied.

Market power is quite common. Many industries only have a few producers such that each producer has some market power. The problem faced by these firms is how to use their market power most effectively. We need to understand how firms with market power set prices. The basic objective of any pricing strategy is to capture consumer surplus and convert it to additional profit for the firm. clearly distinguish between the three broads forms of price discrimination and how it is applied.

Micro Economics For Today

10th Edition

ISBN:9781337613064

Author:Tucker, Irvin B.

Publisher:Tucker, Irvin B.

Chapter9: Monopoly

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 20SQ

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

This gives an opportunity to explore direct and indirect price discrimination within the context of a hypothetical scenario. Your business partner is strongly opposed to your proposal to charge your largest customers lower prices for your web-based services than what you will charge your smaller customers. She is arguing it is unethical, unfair, and possibly illegal. Make a case that both groups of customers will be satisfied with the deal and that this is a perfectly legal form of pricing in a business-to-customer relationship. What degree is this type of price discrimination?
A large firm has two divisions: an upstream division that is a monopoly supplier of an input whose only market is the downstream division that produces the final output. To produce one unit of the final output, the downstream division requires one unit of the input. If the inverse demand for the final output is P = 1,000 − 80Q, would the company’s value be maximized by paying upstream and downstream divisional managers a percentage of their divisional profits?
Suppose two brothers own identical skydiving companies but have decided to experiment with different pricing structures. The older brother’s company, Air Adventures, charges everyone the same price, while the younger brother’s company, Sky Warriors, sets its prices using a twotiered, price-discrimination model. Assuming that both companies face the same market demand curves, marginal costs, and costs of production, and wield significant market power for their service area, which of the following is most likely to occur? a. Air Adventures will generate a similar net revenue to Sky Warriors. b. Sky Warriors will generate a higher net revenue than Air Adventures. c. Sky Warriors will generate a lower net revenue than Air Adventures. d. Air Adventures will generate a higher net revenue than Sky Warriors. e. Sky Warriors will eventually switch to the Air Adventures model.
Smyth Industries operated as a monopolist for the past several years, earning annual profits amounting to $50 million, which it could have maintained if Jones Incorporated did not enter the market. The result of this increased competition is lower prices and lower profits; Smyth Industries now earns $10 million annually. The managers of Smyth Industries are trying to devise a plan to drive Jones Incorporated out of the market so Smyth can regain its monopoly position (and profit). One of Smyth's managers suggests pricing its product 50 percent below marginal cost for exactly one year. The estimated impact of such a move is a loss of $1 billion. Ignoring antitrust concerns, compute the present value of Smyth Industries' profits if it could have remained a monopoly when the interest rate was 5 percent. Multiple Choice $210 million $200 million $1.05 billion $100 million
Explain how the mechanism for the application of three types of price discrimination that can be effective from a firm's point of view in order to maximize its profit. You are required to provide examples to show how this can be done.
You are a pricing analyst for QuantCrunch Corporation, a company that sells a statistical software package. To date, you only have one client. A recent internal study reveals that this client’s inverse demand for your software is P=1500-5Q and that it would cost you $1,000 per unit to install and maintain software at this client’s site. What is the profit that results from two-part pricing? (Hint: set the per-unit price for each unit of the software installed and maintained equal to marginal cost; and charge a fixed “licensing fee” that extracts all consumer surplus from the client)
Assume there are two companies in the region, A and B. You currently work for Company B. Both companies service the entire market and have a combined market share of 100%. At the start of the period, A and B split the market evenly with 50% share each. However, A has adopted a new customer retention tool and has projected the following switching matrix. TO FROM A B A 0.8 0.2 B 0.3 0.7 Given this switching matrix. 1 - What is the projected Market Share for Company A next period? 2- Assume that each customer has a profitability of $30 each year. There are 10,000 customers in the market. How much profit per year, in the long run and assuming no other costs or changes to the market, can we assume that B will lose due to this new technology compared to their prior position?
Price competition between firms, from the firms’ perspective, can be similar to the prisoners’ dilemma. The best outcome for all firms would be for all to charge a high price. However, if the other firms charge a high price, any individual firm has incentives to charge a low price and steal the market. Additionally, if any other firm chooses a low price, each firm should charge a low price too so that it doesn’t get priced out of the market. Explain how price-matching (firms announcing a policy where they match the lowest price a customer can find or will honor a competitor’s coupon) can help firms avoid the Nash equilibrium in which they all charge a low price. Is it misleading for a firm to advertise price-matching as being beneficial to consumers? (Hint: What outcomes of the game are ruled out by the price-matching policy? How does ruling out these outcomes change the game and the decision the firms face?)
Price competition between firms, from the firms’ perspective, can be similar to the prisoners’ dilemma. The best outcome for all firms would be for all to charge a high price. However, if the other firms charge a high price, any individual firm has incentives to charge a low price and steal the market. Additionally, if any other firm chooses a low price, each firm should charge a low price too so that it doesn’t get priced out of the market. Explain how price-matching (firms announcing a policy where they match the lowest price a customer can find or will honor a competitor’s coupon) can help firms avoid the Nash equilibrium in which they all charge a low price. Is it misleading for a firm to advertise price-matching as being beneficial to consumers? What outcomes of the game are ruled out by the price-matching policy? How does ruling out these outcomes change the game and the decision the firms face?
The Hull Petroleum Company and Inverted V are retail gasoline franchises that compete in a local market to sell gasoline to consumers. Hull and Inverted V are located across the street from each other and can observe the prices posted on each other’s marquees. Demand for gasoline in this market is Q = 80 -9P, and both franchises obtain gasoline from their supplier at $2.75 per gallon. On the day that both franchises opened for business, each owner was observed changing the price of gasoline advertised on its marquee more than 10 times; the owner of Hull lowered its price to slightly undercut Inverted V’s price, and the owner of Inverted V lowered its advertised price to beat Hull’s price. Since then, prices appear to have stabilized. Under current conditions, how many gallons of gasoline are sold in the market, and at what price? Gallons sold: ? Price: $ ? How would prices differ if Hull had service attendants available to fill consumers’ tanks but Inverted V was only a self-service…
The smartphone market has been dominated by Apple, but recently the Droid has been able to leverage Google's information services into market gains, while Blackberry, known for its secure business-oriented network, has attempted to become more attractive with a “friendlier” interface. At the same time, a number of less capable fringe firms are emerging. Suppose an economist analyzes this industry as follows: ECONOMIST: The market had been a near Apple monopoly. Profits of this monopoly attracted entry by Droid- and Blackberry-based phones, increasing rivalry between firms in the industry. The emergence of smaller fringe firms suggests that entry barriers have fallen substantially, so competition has or will soon become fiercer. True or False: This analysis is consistent with the industrial organization (IO) view.
The Jakarta Post - Coordinating Maritime Affairs Minister Luhut Pandjaitan said he wants to push for the emergence of a new player in the jet fuel or avtur business in an effort to lower airfares. The market is currently dominated by state-owned energy company Pertamina. Previously, President Joko Widodo criticized Pertamina for “monopolizing” the avtur business that was blamed for the high price of the commodity. “Because of a monopolistic market, the price isn’t competitive. Many want to sell avtur, and it will lead to lower prices and encourage efficiency.” Jokowi said. Do you agree with the statements? ? Use a relevant graph to help explain your answer. (Hint: Use graphical analysis to compare the condition under perfect competition and monopoly markets in your answer)