Need Step by Step answer: How to draft on Excel. Because Income depends on work effort and work effort depends on nutrition, suppose the relationship between income (Y) and total food availability (F) in a poor household is given by: Y = 10F + 20F2 – 0.6F3 a) If food availability in a two-person household is 20, would it be “rational” to share the food? Explain. b) If food availability in a two-person household is 30, would it be “rational” to share the food? Explain.

Need Step by Step answer: How to draft on Excel. Because Income depends on work effort and work effort depends on nutrition, suppose the relationship between income (Y) and total food availability (F) in a poor household is given by: Y = 10F + 20F2 – 0.6F3 a) If food availability in a two-person household is 20, would it be “rational” to share the food? Explain. b) If food availability in a two-person household is 30, would it be “rational” to share the food? Explain.

Micro Economics For Today

10th Edition

ISBN:9781337613064

Author:Tucker, Irvin B.

Publisher:Tucker, Irvin B.

Chapter1: Introducing The Economic Way Of Thinking

Section1.A: Applying Graphs To Economics

Problem 1SQP

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Because Income depends on work effort and work effort depends on nutrition, suppose the relationship between income (Y) and total food availability (F) in a poor household is given by: Y = 10F + 20F2 – 0.6F3 a) If food availability in a two-person household is 20, would it be “rational” to share the food? Explain. b) If food availability in a two-person household is 30, would it be “rational” to share the food? Explain.
What relationship exists between income and well-being in the well-being curve found in the figure? Satisfaction (0-10 scale) 7.45 7.40 Average responses from surveys asking where you stand between the best possible life for you (which is 10/10) and the worst (0/10). 6.5 5.7 Small fall in well-being of rich Large rise in well-being C of poor B To the poor $0 $20,000 $45,000 Well-being curve From the rich B $175,000 $200,000 Annual income a negative relationship with increasing marginal gains in well-being as income rises a negative relationship with decreasing marginal gains in well-being as income rises a positive relationship with increasing marginal gains in well-being as income rises Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism.Answer completely.You will get up vote for sure.
Which of the following best describes the income effect? Group of answer choices The price of designer jeans has increased, so the buying power of your income has been reduced. You purchase 2 new pairs of new jeans instead of 3 that year. The bank increases interest rates on savings accounts from .04% to 5%, so you start placing more of your monthly income in that savings account. The gap between the rich and everyone else has gotten bigger. The price of designer jeans has increased, so you have less of an incentive to purchase new jeans. You purchase 3 pairs of chinos instead that year.
Follow-up questions d. In this model, workers earn the same total assets whether they work L1 or L2 hours. Is the worker better offff at L1 or L2 hours of work? e. If disutility from work were included in the model, would this shrink, expand, or keep the same the size of the region where workers have no incentive to work? f. In your own version of Figure 18.7, draw three sets of plausible utility curves that take assets as a positive input and hours worked as a negative input. Draw one set so that the worker elects to work less than L1 hours, one set so that the worker elects to work exactly L1 hours, and one set so that the worker elects to work more than L2 hours. g. Explain why the utility curves cannot be drawn so as to induce the worker to work between L1 and L2 hours. h Yelowitz (1995) studies a Medicaid reform measure that reduced the Medicaid work disincentive. One of the reforms he studied raised the Medicaid eligibility threshold income level by 33%. Draw a new version of the…
Suppose a person can work up to 80 hours per week at a pre-tax wage of $20 per hour but faces a constant 20% payroll tax. Assume that under these conditions the person maximizes utility by choosing to work 50 hours each week. The government proposes a negative income tax so that everyone receives $300 per week regardless of how much they work. To pay for the negative income tax, the payroll tax would be increased to 50%. Using the labor-leisure model, graphically show whether a person would be better off if the negative income tax is adopted and indicate whether hours worked increases or decreases due to the policy.
How would you demonstrate part c) diagramatically 6. Assume you can work as many hours you wish at £12 per hour (net of tax). If you do not work, you have no income. You have no ability to borrow or lend, so your consumption, c, is simply equal to your income. b) Assume that your optimal choice of consumption and leisure is to work 8 hours per day. Illustrate this choice diagrammatically using the feasible set and indifference curves. c) Use indifference curves and the feasible set to show why, given the properties of the optimal choice in part b), it is not optimal to work, say, 10, or 6 hours per day.
Assume you can work as many hours you wish at £12 per hour (net of tax). If you do not work, you have no income. You have no ability to borrow or lend, so your consumption, c, is simply equal to your income. b) Assume that your optimal choice of consumption and leisure is to work 8 hours per day. Illustrate this choice diagrammatically using the feasible set and indifference curves.
Anna and Bob are the only residents of a small town. The town currently funds its fire department solely from the individual contributions of these two residents. Each of the two residents has a utility function over private goods ? and total number of firemen ?, of the form: ?(?,?)=2ln?+ln?. The total provision of firemen hired, ?, is the sum of the number hired by each of the two persons: ?=??+??. Ann and Bob both have income of 200 each, and the price of both the private good and a fireman is 1. They are limited to providing between 0 and 200 firemen. For the purposes of this problem, you can treat the number of firemen as a continuous variable (it could be man-years). Consider the setup from Question 2. Suppose that the government recruits additional ?N firemen and taxes Ann and Bob equally to cover the cost. Therefore, the total number of firemen is ??+??+?MA+MB+N, where ??,??MA,MB are appropriate individually-optimal contributions of ?A and ?B(i.e., the agents behave optimally,…
With the use of graphs state how the Consumer’s optimum in the Fisher’s Intertemporal Choice Model.
Q6 Assume that we are referring to a typical consumer named Just Trudeau. If money income increases in Canada and the prices of apples (A) and beans (B) both increase, then Just Trudeau budget line: Multiple Choice will no longer be tangent to Just Trudeau's indifference curve. may shift either to the right or the left. will shift to the right. will shift to the left. will cause Just Trudeau's indifference map to implode.
Consider a couple (a husband and a wife) that jointly represents their collective preferences between combinations of household production time (X) and purchased goods and services (Y) according to the formula W = X2Y, where W represents the level of welfare. Suppose the maximum time available in a day is 16 hours and currently the wife devotes 6 hours to market work (H) at a wage of $16 per hour. a. What is the level of welfare associated with the wife’s current situation? b. How much additional purchasing power would the wife contribute if her market work hours increased to 8? c. How much of an increase in purchased goods and services would be necessary to compensate for the additional 2 hours of lost household production? d. Should this couple choose to have the wife increase her market work by 2 hours? e. If this couple is raising a child, suppose that combinations of household production and purchased goods are now ranked according to the formula U = X3Y. Would the additional 2…
Q1: Suppose Labor and Capital are substitutes and the price of capital falls. All else equal, we should expect the labor select (supply, demand) Curve shift select ( up to the right, down to the left ) and for equilibrium wages to select (rise, fall) Q2: An individual has a utility function over Leisure and Income such that ?=?1/2?1/2 This individual has a budget constraint ?=?⋅(24−?)+? The best possible wage this individual can earn in the labor market is $2 per hour. This individual is $30 in debt (they have negative non-labor income). If this individual is earning a utility level of 4, which of the following are true? Group of answer choices The worker could be supplying 1 unit of Labor The worker could be earning $10 The worker could be supplying 8 units of labor The worker is maximizing their utility given their budget The worker's Marginal Rate of Substitution at the point where the budget constraint intersects the indifference curve is equal to -2