Opportunity cost. Revolution Records will build a new recording studio on a vacant lot next to the operations center. The land was purchased five years ago for $450,000. Today the value of the land has appreciated to $780,000. Revolution Records did not consider the value of the land in its NPV calcula- tions for the studio project (it had already spent the money to acquire the and long before this project was considered). The NPV of the recording stu- dio is $600,000. Should Revolution Records have considered the land as part of the cash flow of the recording studio? If yes, what value should be used, 450,000 or $780,000? How will the value affect the project?

Opportunity cost. Revolution Records will build a new recording studio on a vacant lot next to the operations center. The land was purchased five years ago for $450,000. Today the value of the land has appreciated to $780,000. Revolution Records did not consider the value of the land in its NPV calcula- tions for the studio project (it had already spent the money to acquire the and long before this project was considered). The NPV of the recording stu- dio is $600,000. Should Revolution Records have considered the land as part of the cash flow of the recording studio? If yes, what value should be used, 450,000 or $780,000? How will the value affect the project?

EBK CONTEMPORARY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

14th Edition

ISBN:9781337514835

Author:MOYER

Publisher:MOYER

Chapter9: Capital Budgeting And Cash Flow Analysis

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 10P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

The Aubey Coffee Company is evaluating the within-plant distribution system for its new roasting, grinding, and packing plant. The two alternatives are (1) a conveyor system with a high initial cost but low annual operating costs and (2) several forklift trucks, which cost less but have considerably higher operating costs. The decision to construct the plant has already been made, and the choice here will have no effect on the overall revenues of the project. The cost of capital for the plant is 8%, and the projects’ expected net costs are listed in the following table: What is the IRR of each alternative? What is the present value of the costs of each alternative? Which method should be chosen?
Dauten is offered a replacement machine which has a cost of 8,000, an estimated useful life of 6 years, and an estimated salvage value of 800. The replacement machine is eligible for 100% bonus depreciation at the time of purchase- The replacement machine would permit an output expansion, so sales would rise by 1,000 per year; even so, the new machines much greater efficiency would cause operating expenses to decline by 1,500 per year The new machine would require that inventories be increased by 2,000, but accounts payable would simultaneously increase by 500. Dautens marginal federal-plus-state tax rate is 25%, and its WACC is 11%. Should it replace the old machine?
Opportunity cost. Revolution Records will build a new recording studio on a vacant lot next to the operations center. The land was purchased five years ago for $480,000. Today, the value of the land has appreciated to $750,000. Revolution Records did not consider the value of the land in its NPV calculations for the studio project (it had already spent the money to acquire the land long before this project was considered). The NPV of the recording studio is $590,000. Should Revolution Records have considered the land as part of the cash flow of the recording studio? If yes, what value should be used, $480,000 or $750,000? How will the value affect the project? Should Revolution Records have considered the land as part of the cash flow of the recording studio? (Select the best response.) A. Yes. B. No.
Please DO NOT USE EXCEL TO SOLVE A land development company is considering the purchase of earth moving equipment. The equipment will have a first cost of $190,000 and a salvage value of $70,000 when the company sells it in 10 years. A service contract for maintenance on the equipment will cost $40,0000 per year. The operating cost is expected to be $260 per day. Alternatively, the company can rent the necessary equipment for $1100 per day and hire a driver for $180 per day. If the company's MARR is 10% per year how many days per year must the company need the equipment in order to justify its purchase?
Richard XYZ Company., is looking at setting up a new manufacturing plant in South Park. The company bought some land six years ago for $5.3 million in anticipation of using it as a warehouse and distribution site, but the company has since decided to rent facilities elsewhere. The land would net $7.7 million aftertax if it were sold today. The company now wants to build its new manufacturing plant on this land; the plant will cost $29.3 million to build, and the site requires $1.41 million worth of grading before it is suitable for construction. What is the proper cash flow amount to use as the initial investment in fixed assets when evaluating this project?Thank you for your help very appreciated.
The BLE company is considering constructing a plant to manufacture a propose new products. The land costs P 15,000,000; the building costs P 30,000,000; the equipment cost p 12,500,000; and P 5,000,000 working capital is required. At the end of 12 years, the land can be sold for P 25,000,000; the building for P 12,000,000; the equipment for P 250,000; and all of the working capital recovered. The annual disbursement for labor, materials, and all other expenses are estimated to cost P 23,750,000. If the company requires a minimum return of 25%, what should be the minimum annual sales for 12 years to justify this investment?
Bangor Moving Company is thinking of opening a new warehouse, and the key data are shown below. The company owns the building that would be used, and it could sell it for $100,000 after taxes if it decides not to open the new warehouse. The equipment for the project would be depreciated by the straight-line method over the project's 3-year life, after which it would be worth nothing and thus it would have a zero salvage value. No new working capital would be required, and revenues and other operating costs would be constant over the project's 3-year life. What is the project's NPV? (Hint: Cash flows are constant in Years 1-3.) Project cost of capital (r)10.0%Opportunity cost$100,000Net equipment cost (depreciable basis)$65,000Straight-line deprec. rate for equipment33.333%Sales revenues, each year$123,000Operating costs (excl. deprec.), each year$25,000Tax rate25%
APA is planning to expand its operations and plans to purchase a parcel of land on which to construct a building for their review center, which they will need 5 years hence. The current costs are: land: P2M; building: P3.5M. Since these are not needed immediately, the company plans to defer the purchase of the land and the construction of the building until they are needed. If the value of the land and the cost of the building are expected to appreciate at the rates of 10% and 8% per annum, respectively. What will be the total cost of the investment after 5 years? A. P8,580,275.74 B. P7,244,668.37 C. P8,363,668.27 D. None of these
Century Roofing is thinking of opening a new warehouse, and the key data are shown below. The company owns the building that would be used, and it could sell it for $100,000 after taxes if it decides not to open the new warehouse. The equipment for the project would be depreciated by the straight-line method over the project's 3-year life, after which it would be worth nothing and thus it would have a zero salvage value. No new working capital would be required, and revenues and other operating costs would be constant over the project's 3-year life. What is the project's NPV? (Hint: Cash flows are constant in Years 1-3.) Project cost of capital (r) 10.0% Opportunity cost $100,000 Net equipment cost (depreciable basis) $65,000 Straight-line deprec. rate for equipment 33.333% Sales revenues, each year $123,000 Operating costs (excl. deprec.), each year $25,000 Tax rate 25% a. $29,691 b. $26,796 c. $31,254 d. $28,207
Century Roofing is thinking of opening a new warehouse, and the key data are shown below. The company owns the building that would be used, and it could sell it for $100,000 after taxes if it decides not to open the new warehouse. The equipment for the project would be depreciated by the straight-line method over the project's 3-year life, after which it would be worth nothing and thus it would have a zero salvage value. No new working capital would be required, and revenues and other operating costs would be constant over the project's 3-year life. What is the project's NPV? (Hint: Cash flows are constant in Years 1-3.) Project cost of capital (r) 10.0% Opportunity cost $100,000 Net equipment cost (depreciable basis) $65,000 Straight-line deprec. rate for equipment 33.333% Sales revenues, each year $123,000 Operating costs (excl. deprec.), each year $25,000 Tax rate 25%
KP has spent $1000 on research and development (R&D) and FDA testing for Corzine.• The Corzine project will require building a new manufacturing plant. KP purchased a plot of land 5 yearsago for $500. The land was recently appraised at $1000. If KP rejects the Corzine project they will sellthe land since it will not be needed.• KP will spend $8000 to build the plant.• The new plant will be depreciated down to zero on a straight-line basis, over the project’s 5 year usefullife.• KP will need to increase Net Working Capital (NWC) by $1000 at time zero. NWC will then decrease by$200 each year of the project’s life, so that after year 5 the NWC is completely recovered.• The fixed assets associated with the project will have no salvage value. KP will need to spend $500 attime 5 to clean up hazardous waste from the plant. The $500 is a tax-deductible expense.• KP spent $500 on a marketing study that resulted in this sales forecast for the quantity sold each year:Year Units sold (Q)1 8002…
Sub-Prime Loan Company is thinking of opening a new office, and the key data are shown below. The company owns the building that would be used, and it could sell it for $100,000 after taxes if it decides not to open the new office. The equipment for the project would be depreciated by the straight-line method over the project's 3-year life, after which it would be worth nothing and thus it would have a zero salvage value. No change in net operating working capital would be required, and revenues and other operating costs would be constant over the project's 3-year life. What is the project's NPV? (Hint: Cash flows are constant in Years 1-3.) Do not round the intermediate calculations and round the final answer to the nearest whole number. WACC 10.0% Opportunity cost $100,000 Net equipment cost (depreciable basis) $65,000 Straight-line depr. rate for equipment 33.333% Annual sales revenues $128,000 Annual operating costs (excl. depr.) $25,000 Tax rate 35%