Q1) An expected utility maximiser owns a car worth £60000£60000 and has a bank account with £20000£20000. The money in the bank is safe, but there is a 50%50% probability that the car will be stolen. The utility of wealth for the agent is u(y)=ln(y)u(y)=ln⁡(y) and they have no other assets. Q2) Consider the setup from Question 1. A risk-neutral insurance company is willing to insure the car at the premium of π=£2/3π=£2/3 for every one pound of coverage.Q3) Consider the setup from Questions 1 and 2. How much profits, in expectation, does the insurance company earn on insuring the individual? Consider the setup from Questions 1-3. Suppose that the firm is not charging the agent per unit of indemnity. Instead, it can propose to give theagent the total wealth r1 in the 'good state' and the total wealth x2 in the 'bad state' in return for the agents entire wealthW = 60 000 + 20 000 = 80 000 and W – L= 80 000 – 60 000 = 20000, respectively. Below, we shall refer to the pair (a1, x2) as acontract.Given the coverage chosen by the individual in Question 2, which of the following statements is correct?O a.There is a contract that is preferable to the outcome selected in Question 2 for both by the consumer and the firm.Ob.There is NO contract that is preferable to the outcome selected in Question 2 for both the consumer and the firm.O C.Any contract that the agent would be willing to accept must be equal to the outcome selected in Question 2.O d.Any contract that the agent would be willing to accept must be Pareto efficient.

Since you have asked multiple questions, we will solve the first question for you. If you want any…

Q1) An expected utility maximiser owns a car worth £60000£60000 and has a bank account with £20000£20000. The money in the bank is safe, but there is a 50%50% probability that the car will be stolen. The utility of wealth for the agent is u(y)=ln(y)u(y)=ln⁡(y) and they have no other assets. Q2) Consider the setup from Question 1. A risk-neutral insurance company is willing to insure the car at the premium of π=£2/3π=£2/3 for every one pound of coverage. Q3) Consider the setup from Questions 1 and 2. How much profits, in expectation, does the insurance company earn on insuring the individual?

Q1) An expected utility maximiser owns a car worth £60000£60000 and has a bank account with £20000£20000. The money in the bank is safe, but there is a 50%50% probability that the car will be stolen. The utility of wealth for the agent is u(y)=ln(y)u(y)=ln⁡(y) and they have no other assets. Q2) Consider the setup from Question 1. A risk-neutral insurance company is willing to insure the car at the premium of π=£2/3π=£2/3 for every one pound of coverage. Q3) Consider the setup from Questions 1 and 2. How much profits, in expectation, does the insurance company earn on insuring the individual?

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter18: Asymmetric Information

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 18.6P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Two travelers own an identical suitcase that contains identical antiques. The airline is liable for a maximum of $100 per suitcase. To determine how much to reimburse each traveler, the airline puts them in different rooms (so that they cannot communicate), and ask them to write down an amount (an integer number) between $2 and $100. If both write down the same number, the airline will reimburse both travelers that amount. However, if the two amounts are different, both travelers will be paid the lowest of the two numbers along with a bonus/malus: $2 extra will be paid to the traveler who wrote down the lower value and a $2 deduction will be taken from the person who wrote down the higher amount. What are the travelers’ best response functions? What are the Nash equilbria of the game? Are they Pareto efficient? Explain the intuition why.
Two manufacturers, denoted 1 and 2, are competing for 100 identical customers. Each manufacturer chooses both the price and quality of its product, where each variable can take any nonnegative real number. Let pi and xi denote, respectively, the price and quality of manufacturer i’s product. The cost to manufacturer i of producing for one customer is 10 + 5xi. Note in this expression that the cost is higher when the quality is higher. If manufacturer i sells to qi customers, then its total cost is qi(10 + 5xi). Each customer buys from the manufacturer who offers the greatest value, where the value of buying from manufacturer i is 1,000 + xi - pi; higher quality and lower price mean more value. A manufacturer’s payoff is its profit, which equals qi(pi - 10 - 5xi). If one manufacturer offers higher value, then all 100 customers buy from it. If both manufacturers offer the same value, then 50 customers buy from manufacturer 1 and the other 50 from manufacturer 2. Find all symmetric Nash…
The FCC has hired you as a consultant to design an auction to sell wireless spectrum rights. The FCC indicates that its goal of using auctions to sell these spectrum rights is to generate revenue. Since most bidders are large telecommunications companies, you rationally surmise that all participants in the auction are risk neutral. Which auction type—first-price, second-price, English, or Dutch—would you recommend if all bidders value spectrum rights identically but have different estimates of the true underlying value of spectrum rights? Explain
You are a bidder in an independent private values auction, and you value the object at $4,500. Each bidder perceives that valuations are uniformly distributed between $1,000 and $10,000. Determine your optimal bidding strategy in a first-price, sealed-bid auction when the total number of bidders (including you) is: a. 2 bidders.Bid: $ b. 10 bidders.Bid: $ c. 100 bidders.Bid: $
Consider a first-price, sealed-bid auction, and suppose there are only three feasible bids: A bidder can bid 1, 2, or 3. The payoff to a losing bidder is zero. The payoff to a winning bidder equals his valuation minus the price paid (which, by the rules of the auction, is his bid). What is private information to a bidder is how much the item is worth to him; hence, a bidder’s type is his valuation. Assume that there are only two valuations, which we’ll denote L and H, where H > 3 > L > 2. Assume also that each bidder has probability .75 of having a high valuation, H. The Bayesian game is then structured as follows: First, Nature chooses the two bidders’ valuations. Second, each bidder learns his valuation, but does not learn the valuation of the other bidder. Third, the two bidders simultaneously submit bids. A strategy for a bidder is a pair of actions: what to bid when he has a high valuation and what to bid when he has a low valuation. a. Derive the conditions on H and L…
For each of the following scenarios, determine whether the decision maker is risk neutral, risk averse, or risk loving.a) A manager prefers a 10 percent chance of receiving $1,000 and a 90 percent chance of receiving $100 to receiving $190 for sure.b) A shareholder prefers receiving $775 with certainty to a 75 percent chance of receiving $1,000 and a 25 percent chance of receiving $100.c) A consumer is indifferent between receiving $550 for sure and a lottery that pays $1,000 half of the time and $100 half of the time.
You have three tickets to a Celtics game on a night that you are going to be out of town (so the value of unsold tickets is zero to you). There are only four possible buyers of a Celtics ticket. The table below lists the respective reservation prices of these four possible buyers: Customer Reservation Price 1 $25 2 $35 3 $50 4 $60 a) How much revenue can you generate using the English auction mechanism from the sale of the first ticket? [Bids can be made in increments of $1.00] b) How much revenue can you generate using the English auction mechanism from the sale of the second ticket? [Bids can be made in increments of $1.00] c) How much revenue can you generate using the English auction mechanism from the sale of the third ticket? [Bids can be made in increments of $1.00] d) How much total revenue can you generate using the English…
Q56 A Nash equilibrium is an outcome... a. Achieved by cooperation between players in the game. b. That is achieved by collusion where no party has an incentive to change their behaviour. c. Where each player's strategy depends on the behaviour of its opponents. d. That is achieved when players in the game have jointly maximized profits and divided those profits according to market share of each player. e. Where each player's best strategy is to maintain its present behaviour given the present behaviour of the other players.
Q2.1 In the second round with two buyers remaining, the probability that a buyer with valuation v wins is vN-1, where N is the number of buyers in the first round. Use the revenue equivalence theorem to derive the symmetric equilibrium bidding function b(v) for the buyers in stage two. Show your work. Q2.2 At the end of the auction what is the value of the actual (not expected) revenue that the seller receives? Round your answer to at least three decimal spaces.
Consider the incomplete-information version of the spatial Bertrand model with firms i = 1, 2. For each firm, 25% of 1000 potential consumers are partially informed and only know about firm i’s product. The remaining 50% know about both firms’ products. Consumers are evenly distributed along a one-mile street and the shops are located at either end of the street. Assume all consumers have maximum willingness to pay of 16, (there-and-back) transport costs are 2, and the location of the indifferent consumer is xm = (p2 – p1 + t)/2, where pi is the price at shop i and t is transport costs. How much profit does each firm make if p1 = p2 = 12 and marginal (and average) cost c = 10 for both firms?
For questions 32 - 35 consider the following "research and development" game. Firms A and B are contemplating whether or not to invest in R8D. Each has two options: "Invest" and "Abstain." A firm that invests will invent product X with a probability of 0.5, whereas a firm that abstains is incapable of invention. Investment costs $6. If a firm doesn't invent X. it makes 50 in revenue. If a firm invests and is the only one to invent X. it becomes a monopolist and generates $20 in revenue. If both firms invent X, each firm becomes a duopolist, and generates $8 in revenue. Revenues are gross figures (i.e. they are not net of investment costs), and there are no costs besides investments costs (i.e. no variable cost of production etc.). The firms are risk-neutral entities, and are uninformed of each other's investment decisions. Find the Nash Equilibrium (or Equilibria) of the "research and development" game. A. There are no Nash Equilibria B. Invest/Invest C. Invest/Abstain, and…
For questions 32 - 35 consider the following "research and development" game. Firms A and B are contemplating whether or not to invest in R8D. Each has two options: "Invest" and "Abstain." A firm that invests will invent product X with a probability of 0.5, whereas a firm that abstains is incapable of invention. Investment costs $6. If a firm doesn't invent X. it makes 50 in revenue. If a firm invests and is the only one to invent X. it becomes a monopolist and generates $20 in revenue. If both firms invent X, each firm becomes a duopolist, and generates $8 in revenue. Revenues are gross figures (i.e. they are not net of investment costs), and there are no costs besides investments costs (i.e. no variable cost of production etc.). The firms are risk-neutral entities, and are uninformed of each other's investment decisions. Find the Nash Equilibrium (or Equilibria) of the "research and development" game. There are no Nash Equilibria Invest/Invest Invest/Abstain, and Abstain/Invests…