Question 3 Consider the following game. Which of the statements below are true for this game? L M R U 2,2 -1,-1 1,1 M-1-1 1,1 1,2 D 1,1 -2,1 -1,-1 a. The Row player has a strictly dominated action. b. The Column player has a strictly dominated action. c. There is no Nash equilibrium for this game. d. The row player playing D and the column player playing R constitutes a Nash equilibrium of this game. e. There are two pure strategy Nash equilibria to this game. f. There is no mixed strategy equilibrium in this game.

Question 3 Consider the following game. Which of the statements below are true for this game? L M R U 2,2 -1,-1 1,1 M-1-1 1,1 1,2 D 1,1 -2,1 -1,-1 a. The Row player has a strictly dominated action. b. The Column player has a strictly dominated action. c. There is no Nash equilibrium for this game. d. The row player playing D and the column player playing R constitutes a Nash equilibrium of this game. e. There are two pure strategy Nash equilibria to this game. f. There is no mixed strategy equilibrium in this game.

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter8: Game Theory

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 8.9P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

4 Consider an extensive game where player 1 starts with choosing of two actions, A or B. Player 2 observes player 1’s move and makes her move; if the move by player 1 is A, then player 2 can take three actions, X, Y or Z, if the move by player 1 is B, then player 2 can take of of two actions, U or V. Write down all teminal histories, proper subhistories, the player function and strategies of players in this game.
1. Solve for the mixed strategy Nash equilibrium of the game above. Explain carefully how you solve for it. 2. In the equilibrium you calculated above, what is the probability that both consoles are released in October? In December? What are the expected payoffs of firm A and of firm B in equilibrium?
Game Theory a) Consider the following game represented by the game tree below. If you observe Blue Bank playing medium and Green Bank playing bottom, would you be surprised by their choices? Carefully explain why or why not. b) Now assume that Blue and Green Banks play the game with the same actions and payoffs as in a) but they make their choices simultaneously. What is the payoff matrix for this new game? What do you predict will happen in the game? Explain. c) Assume that the game from part a) is played five times, i.e. Blue and Green Banks play a repeated game with the stage game described in a). What do you predict will happen in the game? Explain.
A) Focus on the strategic game at the lower-right side of the gametree. Find all the Nash equilibria for this subgame, including the mixed-strategyones. (b) Find all the subgame perfect equilibria for the entire game, allowingfor both pure and mixed strategies
3. Describe some interaction your company has with another entity (firms producing complementary or substitute products, upstream sup- pliers, or downstream customers), or between internal divisions within your firm that can be described as a sequential or simultaneous game. Diagram the strategies, players, and compute payoffs as best you can. Compute the Nash equilibria. What can you do to change the rules of the game to your advantage? Compute the profit consequences of your advice.
Please no written by hand Which of the following statements is true? Group of answer choices In Nash equilibrium, players are playing the best response to each others’ strategies. In a prisoner’s dilemma game, both players will cooperate if the game is played repeatedly for 20 times. If the prisoner’s dilemma game is played repeatedly 20 times, we will get an efficient outcome. There is always at least one pure-strategy Nash equilibrium in any game. All the other choices are
** Please be advsed that this is practice only from previous yeasr *** Answers: (a) There are no Nash equilibria.(b) There are two pure strategy Nash equilibra, one with (H,H) and another with (L,L), and no mixed strategy Nash equilibria.(c) There are two pure strategy Nash equilibra, one with (H,H) and another with (L,L), and one mixed strategy Nash equilibria with p = 1/2 and q = 1/2.(d) There are two pure strategy Nash equilibra, one with (H,H) and another with (L,L), and one mixed strategy Nash equilibria with p = 1/2 and q = 3/4.(e) There are two pure strategy Nash equilibra, one with (H,H) and another with (L,L), and one mixed strategy Nash equilibria with p = 3/4 and q = 1/2.
5 Suppose two players play one of the two normal-form games shown in Figure 1. L U 0,-1 D 2,4 R 2,0 6,0 L U | 4,-1 D 2,-2 R 2,0Now suppose that Player 2 knows which game is being played, but Player 1 does not. Find the pure strategy Bayesian Nash equilibrium of this game.
16-1 Newspaper Bargaining Two equal-sized newspapers have an overlap in circulation of 10% (10% of the subscribers subscribe to both newspapers). Advertisers are willing to pay $10 to advertise in one newspaper but only $19 to advertise in both, because they’re unwilling to pay twice to reach the same subscribers. What’s the likely bargaining negotiation outcome if the advertisers bargain by telling each newspaper that they’re going to reach an agreement with the other newspaper, so the gains to reaching agreement are only $9? Suppose the two newspapers merge. What is the likely post-merger bargaining outcome? these would be most advantageous from a bargaining position?
(a) Find all the Nash Equilibria, if there is any. (no explanation needed for this part (b) Does player 1 (choosing rows) have any dominant action? If yes, which action(s)? Any dominated action(s)? If yes, which ones? Answer the same questions for player 2, too. (c) If player 1 moves first (and player 2 moves next), what would be the sequentially rational equilibrium (draw the game tree and use backward induction)?What if player 2 moves first (and then player 1 moves next)? (d) Looking at your findings in (c), would player 1 want to move first or second or is she indifferent (the order doesn’t matter)?
6 Two people will select a policy that affects both of them by applying a "veto" in a sequential and alternate manner, that is: person 1 begins to veto a policy and then person 2 exercises his "veto" with the remaining policies; the process repeats until only one policy remains. Assume that there are 3 policies: X,Y,Z, and that person 1 prefers X to Y to Z and person 2 prefers Z to Y to X. a. Represents the game extensively b. Give the number of subgames C. Indicate the total strategies of the players d. find all subgame perfect nash equilibria e. Find all Nash Equilibriums.
Ma3. The payoff matrix below shows the payoffs for Stefan and Imani in a two strategy game. In the mixed strategy equilibrium, Stefan will play strategy Up with a probability of 1/5 and strategy Down with a probability of 4/5, and Imani will play strategy Left with a probability of 2/5 and strategy Right with a probability of 3/5. What is Stefan's expected payoff in the mixed strategy equilibrium? 10.6 5 4.56 10.4