roach this goal? ect one: a. As long as GDP is increasing even a little, they can assume that Americans' living standards are rising. b. As long as the federal government focuses on economic growth in the short-run, it will achieve economi growth in the long-run. c. Since the U.S. population increases about 0.9% per year, in order for living standards to increase, Real GE must increase faster than our population. d. Since the U.S. economy has not successfully achieved long-term economic growth in the last 100 years, federal government should do the opposite of whatever they have been doing.

roach this goal? ect one: a. As long as GDP is increasing even a little, they can assume that Americans' living standards are rising. b. As long as the federal government focuses on economic growth in the short-run, it will achieve economi growth in the long-run. c. Since the U.S. population increases about 0.9% per year, in order for living standards to increase, Real GE must increase faster than our population. d. Since the U.S. economy has not successfully achieved long-term economic growth in the last 100 years, federal government should do the opposite of whatever they have been doing.

Exploring Economics

8th Edition

ISBN:9781544336329

Author:Robert L. Sexton

Publisher:Robert L. Sexton

Chapter20: Economic Growth In The Global Economy

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 2P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

An economy starts off with a GDP per capita of 5,000. How large will the GDP per capita be if it grows at an annual rate of 2 for 20 years? 2 for 40 years? 4 for 40 years? 6 for 40 years?
What do the growth accounting studies conclude are the determinants of growth? Which is more important, the determinants or how they am combined?
Why dues productivity growth in high-income economies not slow down as it runs into diminishing returns from additional investments in physical capital and human capital? Does this show one area where the theory of diminishing returns fails to apply? Why or why not?
For a high-income economy like the United States, what aggregate production function elements are most important in bringing about growth in GDP per capita? What about a middle-income country such as Brazil? A low-income country such as Niger?
Explain the difference between property rights and contractual rights. Why do they matter to economic growth?
Is it possible to have economic growth with no opportunity cost? A)Yes, economic growth requires no current sacrifices-only the passage of time. B) No, but economic growth is always worth whatever sacrifice is required. C) No, because growth depletes the stock of knowledge so that more growth today means less growth tomorrow D) No, because growth requires the sacrifice of consumption goods in order to invest in such things as capital tormation and research and development.
Consider an economy with a Cobb-Douglas production function with α = 1/3 that begins in steady state with a growth rate of technological progress of g of 2 percent. Consider what happens when g increases to 3 percent. (a) What is the growth rate of output per worker before the change? What happens to this growth rate in the long run? (b) Perform a growth accounting exercise for the economy, decomposing the growth rate in output per capita into components contributed by capital per capita growth and technology growth. What is the contribution of the change in g to output per capita growth according to this formula? (c) In what sense is the growth accounting result in part b producing a misleading picture of this experiment? Explain why this is the case.
. Suppose that society decided to reduce consumptionand increase investment.a. How would this change affect economic growth?b. What groups in society would benefit from thischange? What groups might be hurt?
Suppose, a country X has a GDP level of 4, 50,000 and a growth rate of 10% in 2007(calculated at the end of the fiscal year 2007). The experts predict that the growth ofthe economy of Country X will gradually slowdown in the coming years. Moreprecisely, they foresee the following growth rates for the future:2007 – 2010 = 10%2010 – 2013 = 9%2013 – 2016 = 7.5%2016 – 2019 = 5%2019 – on = 1% Hint: The list above should be read as saying that, for instance, the growth rate fromthe end of the fiscal year 2007 until the end of 2010 will be 10 %, then from the end of2010 until the end of 2013 it will be 9% and so on. Assuming that the predictions of the experts listed above are accurate, when in thefuture will Country X’s GDP double compared to the GDP level of 2007? Consider now the more optimistic scenario in which the economy does not slow downand the current growth rate of 10% remains constant in the coming years. How longwill it take for the GDP level to double in this scenario? Express…