Rose and Colin play the following dynamic game with Rose moving first. In her first move, Rose has a choice of either 0 or 3. If she chooses 3, then Rose and Colin play G3 with Colin moving first. If Rose chooses 0 in her first move, then Colin can play either 1 or 2 in his first move. If he plays 1, then Rose and Colin play G₁ with Rose moving first, and if he plays 2, then Rose and Colin play G₂ with Rose moving first. Draw the game tree associated with this game, and find the backwards induction solution.

Rose and Colin play the following dynamic game with Rose moving first. In her first move, Rose has a choice of either 0 or 3. If she chooses 3, then Rose and Colin play G3 with Colin moving first. If Rose chooses 0 in her first move, then Colin can play either 1 or 2 in his first move. If he plays 1, then Rose and Colin play G₁ with Rose moving first, and if he plays 2, then Rose and Colin play G₂ with Rose moving first. Draw the game tree associated with this game, and find the backwards induction solution.

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter8: Game Theory

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 8.1P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

5,3 4,4 3,6 7,6 Find the pure strategy nash equilibria
on 8.1 Consider the following game: Player 1 A C D 7,6 5,8 0,0 Player 2 E 5,8 7,6 1, 1 F 0,0 1,1 4,4 a. Find the pure-strategy Nash equilibria (if any). b. Find the mixed-strategy Nash equilibrium in which each player randomizes over just the first two actions. c. Compute players' expected payoffs in the equilibria found in parts (a) and (b). d. Draw the extensive form for this game.
Micro Nash game theory Show that if in a game G, the sets of actions (A i) i in N are compact, and the payment functions (u i) i in N are continuous, then for all i in N, the application of Best response has a closed graph. Conclude that the application of best response has a closed graph.
Exercise 6.1Suppose that two airlines decide to collude. Analyse the game between these two companies. Suppose that each of them can charge for tickets a high price or a low price. If one of them charges 100 euros, it gets few profits if the other also charges 100 euros and high profits if the other charges 200 euros. On the other hand, if the company charges 200 euros, it obtains very little profit if the other charges 100 euros and an average profit if the other also charges 200 euros. a) Represent the matrix of results of this game. b) What is the Nash equilibrium in this game? Explain your answer. c) Is there an outcome that would be better than the Nash equilibrium for the two airlines? How could it be achieved? Who would lose out if it were reached?
Game Theory. 1. Yuppie town has two food stores, LA Boulangerie, which sells bread, and La Fromagerie, whichsells cheese. It costs $1 to make a loaf of bread and $2 to make a pound of cheese. If LaBoulangerie's price is P 1 dollars per loaf of bread and La Fromagerie's price is P 2 dollars per pound ofcheese, their respective weekly sales, Q 1 thousand loaves of bread and Q 2 thousand pounds ofcheese, are given by the following equations: a) For each store, write its profits as a function of P 1 and P 2 , and find the Nash equilibriumprices in this game. b) Suppose that the two stores collude and set prices jointly to maximize the sum of theirprofits. Find the joint profit-maximizing prices for the stores.c) Provide an explanation for the differences between the Nash equilibrium prices and thosethat maximize joint profits.
What is the secure strategy for player B in the game presented in Table
Refer to the accompanying game. Firm A Firm B Low Price High Price Low Price (10,9) (15,8) High Price (−10,7) (11,11) What are the secure strategies for firm A and firm B, respectively?
For the game given, find all Nash equilibria.
The mixed stratergy nash equalibrium consists of : the probability of firm A selecting October is 0.692 and probability of firm A selecting December is 0.309. The probability of firm B selecting October is 0.5 and probability of firm selecting December is 0.5. In the equilibrium you calculated above, what is the probability that both consoles are released in October? In December? What are the expected payoffs of firm A and of firm B in equilibrium?
Show how the concept of focal points can lead us towards unique outcomes in games where multiple Nash equilibria exist. Please you numerous examples.
Consider a simultaneous move game between a union and a company. If both the parties bargain hard, each would gain nothing. If only one party bargains hard the accommodating party gets a profit of $1 million while the bargaining party gets a $5 million, while if they both accommodate, they each get $3 million. If the union leader has already sent strikers to the picket line before entering negotiations, the union has a. Eliminated half of the strategies of the game b. Forced the firm to choose the best response in the union’s best interest c. Made it in the firm’s best interest to accommodate their requests d. All of the above
Consider a simultaneous move game between a union and a company. If both the parties bargain hard, each would gain nothing. If only one party bargains hard the accommodating party gets a profit of $1 million while the bargaining party gets a $5 million, while if they both accommodate, they each get $3 million. If the union leader has already sent strikers to the picket line before entering negotiations, the union has a. Eliminated half of the strategies of the game b. Forced the firm to choose the best response in the union’s best interest c. Made it in the firm’s best interest to accommodate their requests