sand cone method. • Calibrated dry density of Ottawa sand = 1667 ??/?3 • Mass of Ottawa sand to fill the cone = 0.117 kg • Mass of jar + cone + sand (before use) = 6.1 kg • Mass of jar + cone + sand (after use) = 2.83 kg • Mass of moist soil from hole = 3.35 kg • Moisture content of moist soil = 16.1% a. Determine the dry unit weight of compaction in the field. (ANS: 14.97kn/m3) PLS ANSWER NUMBER 2 WITH COMPLETE SOLUTION 2. What is the relative compaction in the field if the maximum dry unit weight in the laboratory is 15.93

sand cone method. • Calibrated dry density of Ottawa sand = 1667 ??/?3 • Mass of Ottawa sand to fill the cone = 0.117 kg • Mass of jar + cone + sand (before use) = 6.1 kg • Mass of jar + cone + sand (after use) = 2.83 kg • Mass of moist soil from hole = 3.35 kg • Moisture content of moist soil = 16.1% a. Determine the dry unit weight of compaction in the field. (ANS: 14.97kn/m3) PLS ANSWER NUMBER 2 WITH COMPLETE SOLUTION 2. What is the relative compaction in the field if the maximum dry unit weight in the laboratory is 15.93

Principles of Geotechnical Engineering (MindTap Course List)

9th Edition

ISBN:9781305970939

Author:Braja M. Das, Khaled Sobhan

Publisher:Braja M. Das, Khaled Sobhan

Chapter17: Subsoil Exploration

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 17.2P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

a completely dry sand sample fills a 200 cm 3 metal cylinder and weighs 260 g (Ws), having Ss = 2.6 Calculate e(void ratio), then complete the schematic. (see the picture). I WILL RATE IT.
a. 100 cm3 saturated sample of quartz sand is weighed, gravity drained, weighed, oven dried, and weighed again. The saturated, gravity-drained, and oven-dried weights are 130g, 110 g, and 105 g, respectively. Using these data, calculate the following quantities. i. Dry bulk density ii. Porosity iii. Degree of saturation after gravity drainage iv. Specific yield b. Given that the soil sample in part (a) above has porosity of 35%. i. Determine the void ratio of this soil. ii. If 50% of the void space is filled with water, with the remaining 50% filled with air, determine the volumetric water content, θ. iii. and the degree of saturation, S.
pls ans soon as posssible During a constant head permeability test on a sand sample, 260ml of water was collected in 2 min. If the sample had a length of 100 mm, a diameter of 40 mm and a maintained head of 200 mm, what is the coefficient of permeability?
Estimate the coefficient of permeability for uniform sand where a sieve analysis indicates that the D10 size is 0.15 mm (by Hazen formula). Also, the particle-size distribution curve for another sand indicates that the D15 size is 0.19 mm. If the sand deposit is in the dense or compact state, estimate the coefficient of permeability.
Estimate the coefficient of permeability for a uniform sand where a sieve analysis indicates that the D10 size is 0.15 mm (by Hazen formula). The particle-size distribution curve for a sand indicates that the D15 size is 0.19 mm. If the sand deposit is in the dense or compact state, estimate the coefficient of permeability.
Repeat Problem 2.8 using the following data. 2.8 The following are the results of a sieve and hydrometer analysis. a. Draw the grain-size distribution curve. b. Determine the percentages of gravel, sand, silt and clay according to the MIT system. c. Repeat Part b according to the USDA system. d. Repeat Part b according to the AASHTO system.
The following data were obtained by conducting liquid limit and plastic limit tests on a soil collected from the site. Liquid limit tests: Plastic limit test: PL = 19.3% a. Draw the flow curve and determine the liquid limit. b. Using the Casagrande plasticity chart (Figure 4.21), determine the soil type.
Refer to the soil in Problem 4.5. Using the Casagrande plasticity chart, graphically estimate the shrinkage limit of the soil as shown in Figure 4.22. 4.5 The following data were obtained by conducting liquid limit and plastic limit tests on a soil collected from the site. Liquid limit tests: Plastic limit test: PL = 19.3% a. Draw the flow curve and determine the liquid limit. b. Using the Casagrande plasticity chart (Figure 4.21), determine the soil type.
Repeat Problem 2.4 with the following data. 2.4 The following are the results of a sieve analysis. a. Determine the percent finer than each sieve and plot a grain-size distribution curve. b. Determine D10, D30, and D60 for each soil. c. Calculate the uniformity coefficient Cu. d. Calculate the coefficient of gradation Cc.
Following results are obtained for a liquid limit test using a fall cone device. Estimate the liquid limit of the soil and the flow index.
Following are the results of a field unit weight determination test performed by means of the sand cone method:• Calibrated dry unit weight of Ottawa sand = 104 lb/ft3• Weight of Ottawa sand to fill the cone = 0.258 lb• Weight of jar + cone + sand (before use) = 13.4 lb• Weight of jar + cone + sand (after use) = 6.39 lb• Weight of moist soil from hole = 7.3 lb• Moisture content of moist soil = 11.6%Determine: Dry unit weight of compaction in the field.
with figures if necessary 1. A wet sand sample has a volume of 4.64 x 10-4 m3 and weighs 8 N. After oven-drying, the weight reduces to 7.5 N. Calculate the water content, void ratio, and degree of saturation. 2. The mass of a wet sample of soil and its container is 0.33 kg. The dry mass of the soil and its container is 0.29 kg. The mass of the container is 0.06 kg and its volume is 0.15 x 10-3 m3. Determine the bulk, dry and saturated unit weights of the soil. Determine the void ratio and degree of saturation. Determine the amount of air void in the soil and the water of water required to saturate 1 m3 of the soil. 3. A sand has a natural water content of 5% and bulk unit weight of 18.0 kN/m3. The void ratios corresponding to the densest and loosest state of this soil are 0.51 and 0.87. Find the relative density and degree of saturation.