Suppose there are 2 petrochemical companies that cause water pollution in the surrounding environment with marginal costs MC1 = 150e1 and MC2 = 50e2 (where e1 and e2 are the amount of waste in m3 reduced by company 1 and company 2). Initially, company 1 disposed of 50 m3 of waste and company 2 disposed of 40 m3 of waste. a. If the government wants to ensure the total waste is reduced by 20 m3 with a cost-effective approach, how much waste must each company reduce?

Suppose there are 2 petrochemical companies that cause water pollution in the surrounding environment with marginal costs MC1 = 150e1 and MC2 = 50e2 (where e1 and e2 are the amount of waste in m3 reduced by company 1 and company 2). Initially, company 1 disposed of 50 m3 of waste and company 2 disposed of 40 m3 of waste. a. If the government wants to ensure the total waste is reduced by 20 m3 with a cost-effective approach, how much waste must each company reduce?

Economics For Today

10th Edition

ISBN:9781337613040

Author:Tucker

Publisher:Tucker

Chapter14: Environmental Economics

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 3SQ: From an economic viewpoint, the optimal amount of pollution a. is zero because all pollution imposes...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Is zero pollution possible under a marketable permits system? Why or why not?
Economists sometimes shock noneconomists by stating that they do not favor the complete elimination of pollution. Explain the rationale for this position.
The perfectly competitive profit-maximizing firm in Exhibit 6 creates water and air pollution as a consequence of producing its output of pigs. If pollution costs are borne by third parties, the firm will maximize economic profit by choosing to a. voluntarily incur costs to reduce its pollution. b. produce at output rate Q3. c. produce at output rate Q2. d. produce at output rate Q4. EXHIBIT 6 Private and Social Cost
Suppose the government initially allocates the permits evenly, so that before trading begins each firm needed to reduce 60 tons of pollution each (120 tons total). How many tons of pollution will each firm reduce after permit trading (i.e. what is Q1and Q2)? Q1=__ ; Q2=___
please answer all. 5. Correcting for negative externalities - Regulation versus tradablepermits Suppose the government wants to reduce the total pollution emitted by three local firms. Currently, each firm is creating 4 units of pollution in the area, for a total of 12 pollution units. If the government wants to reduce total pollution in the area to 6 units, it can choose between the following two methods: Available Methods to Reduce Pollution 1. The government sets pollution standards using regulation. 2. The government allocates tradable pollution permits. Each firm faces different costs, so reducing pollution is more difficult for some firms than others. The following table shows the cost each firm faces to eliminate each unit of pollution. For each firm, assume that the cost of reducing pollution to zero (that is, eliminating all 4 units of pollution) is prohibitively expensive. Firm Cost of Eliminating the... First Unit of Pollution Second Unit…
Assume citizens of Destrahan are complaining that Shell Chemical and Dow Chemical are polluting the environment. Currently, each firm emits 40 tons of pollution per year. Shell Chemical could reduce its pollution at a cost of $500 per ton, and Dow Chemical could reduce its pollution at a cost of $100 per ton. To reduce overall pollution to 40 units, the mayor gives each firm 20 tradable pollution permits. Each permit allows a firm to emit one ton of pollution. Assuming each permit has a market value is $200, what is the cost of reducing pollution to the desired level? a.$2,000 b.$4,000 c.$8,000 d.$10,000
Suppose a lake enjoyed by three homeowners is cleaned up to the socially efficient level of pollution by splitting the cost of cleanup equally among the three homeowners. 1. Describe a situation where at least one homeowner would be made worse off by this cleanup policy. 2. In the situation you described above, is there an alternative way to allocate costs that would avoid this problem? 3. What are the barriers, if any, to achieving this alternative? (250 words or fewer.)
Answer all parts please i have to submit this last question soon please 3. Correcting for negative externalities - Regulation versus tradablepermits Suppose the government wants to reduce the total pollution emitted by three local firms. Currently, each firm is creating 4 units of pollution in the area, for a total of 12 pollution units. If the government wants to reduce total pollution in the area to 6 units, it can choose between the following two methods: Available Methods to Reduce Pollution 1. The government sets pollution standards using regulation. 2. The government allocates tradable pollution permits. Each firm faces different costs, so reducing pollution is more difficult for some firms than others. The following table shows the cost each firm faces to eliminate each unit of pollution. For each firm, assume that the cost of reducing pollution to zero (that is, eliminating all 4 units of pollution) is prohibitively expensive. Firm Cost of…
Suppose a municipality votes to reduce the combined pollution introduced by three local companies. Presently, each firm creates 4 units of pollution in the area, for a total of 12 pollution units. The government can reduce total pollution in the area to 6 units by choosing between the following two methods:Methods to Reduce Pollution1. The government imposes pollution standards using regulation.2. The government issues tradable pollution permits.The costs faced by each firm are different, so it is more difficult for some firms to reduce pollution than others. The following table shows the cost faced by each firm to eliminate each unit of pollution. Assume that the cost of eliminating all 4 units of pollution (that is, reducing pollution to zero) is prohibitively expensive for all three firms.FirmCost of Eliminating the...First Unit of PollutionSecond Unit of PollutionThird Unit of Pollution(Dollars)(Dollars)(Dollars)Firm A 130 165 220Firm B 600 750 1,200Firm C…
The town of Chefsmeadow has 100 residents. Each resident has a car. Each car produces $30 worth of pollution per person. In other words, each person in the town breathes in $30 worth of air pollution harm from one person's car as that person drives around the town. Thus each car produces $3,000 worth of air pollution overall ($30 per person x 100 people = $3,000 total harm). Because there are 100 cars, the total dollar estimate of all the pollution harm caused by all the cars is $300,000.There is a device called a "Polluteaway" that can be installed in a car and cuts its air pollution in half. The device costs $1,000 to buy and install. For the following questions, you can assume each person cares only about the air pollution they breathe and not that others have to breathe. Remember, write the number of the question in front of your answer in the text submission box. 1. What is the dollar gain or loss to one individual (let's call him Fred) in buying and installing a Polluteaway in…