Sweetness Inc. produces a line of chocolate candies and has an optimal capital structure that is 50% debt and 50% equity. Sweetness has a beta of 1.2 and is considering expanding into the appetizer business. Sweetness’ primary competition in the appetizer business has a beta of 1.5 and a 40%/60% debt/equity mix. If the risk-free rate is 7%, the market risk premium is 8.5%, and the marginal tax rate is 40%, what is the cost of the equity-financed portion of Sweetness’ new investment

Sweetness Inc. produces a line of chocolate candies and has an optimal capital structure that is 50% debt and 50% equity. Sweetness has a beta of 1.2 and is considering expanding into the appetizer business. Sweetness’ primary competition in the appetizer business has a beta of 1.5 and a 40%/60% debt/equity mix. If the risk-free rate is 7%, the market risk premium is 8.5%, and the marginal tax rate is 40%, what is the cost of the equity-financed portion of Sweetness’ new investment

EBK CONTEMPORARY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

14th Edition

ISBN:9781337514835

Author:MOYER

Publisher:MOYER

Chapter11: Capital Budgeting And Risk

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 25P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Cyclone Software Co. is trying to establish its optimal capital structure. Its current capital structure consists of 25% debt and 75% equity; however, the CEO believes that the firm should use more debt. The risk-free rate, Rf, is 5%; the market risk premium, RPM, is 6%; and the firm’s tax rate is 40%. Currently, Cyclone’s cost of equity is 14%, which is determined by the CAPM. What would be Cyclone’s estimated cost of equity if it changed its capital structure to 50% debt and 50% equity? based on cost of equity estimations, Should the firm change its capital structure?
Lucky cement Co. is trying to establish its optimal capital structure. Its current capital structure consists of 30% debt and 70% equity; however, the CEO believes that the firm should use more debt. The risk-free rate, Rf, is 5%; the market risk premium, RPM, is 6%; and the firm’s tax rate is 40%. Currently, Lucky’s cost of equity is 14%, which is determined by the CAPM. What would be Lucky’s estimated cost of equity if it changed its capital structure to 40% debt and 60% equity? What would be Lucky’s estimated cost of equity if it changed its capital structure to 50% debt and 50% equity? Based on cost of equity estimations, should the firm change its capital structure? if yes, which point is optimal if the target is to minimize the cost of equity of the firm?
Now consider the case of another company: US Robotics Inc. has a current capital structure of 30% debt and 70% equity. Its current before-tax cost of debt is 8%, and its tax rate is 25%. It currently has a levered beta of 1.25. The risk-free rate is 3.5%, and the risk premium on the market is 8%. US Robotics Inc. is considering changing its capital structure to 60% debt and 40% equity. Increasing the firm’s level of debt will cause its before-tax cost of debt to increase to 10%. First, solve for US Robotics Inc.’s unlevered beta. Use US Robotics Inc.’s unlevered beta to solve for the firm’s levered beta with the new capital structure. Use US Robotics Inc.’s levered beta under the new capital structure, to solve for its cost of equity under the new capital structure. What will the firm’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC) be if it makes this change in its capital structure? 11.78% 12.40% 8.06% 9.30%
Copybold Corporation is a start-up firm considering two alternative capital structures--one is conservative and the other aggressive. The conservative capital structure calls for a D/A ratio = 0.25, while the aggressive strategy call for D/A = 0.75. Once the firm selects its target capital structure it envisions two possible scenarios for its operations: Feast or Famine. The Feast scenario has a 60 percent probability of occurring and forecast EBIT in this state is P60,000. The Famine state has a 40 percent chance of occurring and the EBIT is expected to be P20,000. Further, if the firm selects the conservative capital structure its cost of debt will be 10 percent, while with the aggressive capital structure its debt cost will be 12 percent. The firm will have P400,000 in total assets, it will face a 40 percent marginal tax rate, and the book value of equity per share under either scenario is P10.00 per share. 1. What is the difference between the EPS forecasts for Feast and Famine…
Copybold Corporation is a start-up firm considering two alternative capital structures--one is conservative and the other aggressive. The conservative capital structure calls for a D/A ratio = 0.25, while the aggressive strategy call for D/A = 0.75. Once the firm selects its target capital structure it envisions two possible scenarios for its operations: Feast or Famine. The Feast scenario has a 60 percent probability of occurring and forecast EBIT in this state is P60,000. The Famine state has a 40 percent chance of occurring and the EBIT is expected to be P20,000. Further, if the firm selects the conservative capital structure its cost of debt will be 10 percent, while with the aggressive capital structure its debt cost will be 12 percent. The firm will have P400,000 in total assets, it will face a 40 percent marginal tax rate, and the book value of equity per share under either scenario is P10.00 per share. 2. What is the difference between the EPS forecasts for Feast and Famine…
You are a consultant who has been hired to evaluate a new product line for Markum Enterprises. The upfront investment required to launch the product line is $8 million. The product will generate free cash flow of $0.70 million the first year, and this free cash flow is expected to grow at a rate of 6% per year. Markum has an equity cost of capital of 10.8%, a debt cost of capital of 6.38%, and a tax rate of 25%. Markum maintains a debt-equity ratio of 0.50. a. What is the NPV of the new product line (including any tax shields from leverage)? b. How much debt will Markum initially take on as a result of launching this product line? c. How much of the product line's value is attributable to the present value of interest tax shields? Question content area bottom Part 1 a. What is the NPV of the new product line (including any tax shields from leverage)? The NPV of the new product line is million. (Round to two decimal places.) Part 2 b. How much debt will…
You are a consultant who has been hired to evaluate a new product line for Markum Enterprises. The upfront investment required to launch the product line is $8 million. The product will generate free cash flow of $0.70 million the first year, and this free cash flow is expected to grow at a rate of 6% per year. Markum has an equity cost of capital of 10.8%, a debt cost of capital of 6.38%, and a tax rate of 25%. Markum maintains a debt-equity ratio of 0.50. a. What is the NPV of the new product line (including any tax shields from leverage)? b. How much debt will Markum initially take on as a result of launching this product line? c. How much of the product line's value is attributable to the present value of interest tax shields? Question content area bottom Part 1 a. What is the NPV of the new product line (including any tax shields from leverage)? The NPV of the new product line is $enter your response here million. (Round to two decimal places.)
Lucky cement Co. is trying to establish its optimal capital structure. Its current capital structure consists of 30% debt and 70% equity; however, the CEO believes that the firm should use more debt. The risk-free rate, Rf, is 5%; the market risk premium, RPM, is 6%; and the firm’s tax rate is 40%. Currently, Lucky’s cost of equity is 14%, which is determined by the CAPM.1. What would be Lucky’s estimated cost of equity if it changed its capital structure to 40% debt and 60% equity?2. What would be Lucky’s estimated cost of equity if it changed its capital structure to 50% debt and 50% equity?3. Based on cost of equity estimations, should the firm change its capital structure? if yes, which point is optimal if the target is to minimize the cost of equity of the firm?
You are a consultant who has been hired to evaluate a new product line for Markum Enterprises. The upfront investment required to launch the product line is $7 million. The product will generate free cash flow of $0.76 million the first year, and this free cash flow is expected to grow at a rate of 6% per year. Markum has an equity cost of capital of 10.9%, a debt cost of capital of 5.35%, and a tax rate of 42%. Markum maintains a debt-equity ratio of 0.40. What is the NPV of the new product line (including any tax shields from leverage)? (Round to two decimalplaces.) How much debt will Markum initially take on as a result of launching this product line? (Round to two decimalplaces.) How much of the product line's value is attributable to the present value of interest tax shields? (Round to two decimalplaces.)
FFC is trying to establish its optimal capital structure. Its current capital structure consists of 25% debt and 75% equity; however, the CEO believes that the firm should use more debt. The risk-free rate, rRF, is 4%; the market risk premium, RPM, is 5%; and the firm’s tax rate is 40%. Currently, FFC has beta of 1.5. What would be FFC’s estimated cost of equity if it changed its capital structure to 40% debt and 60% equity? Should the company opt new capital structure, decide based on the cost of equity computations?
Stephens Electronics is considering a change in its target capital structure, which currently consists of 25% debt and 75% equity. The CFO believes the firm should use more debt, but the CEO is reluctant to increase the debt ratio. The risk-free rate, rRFrRF, is 5.0%, the market risk premium, RPM, is 6.0%, and the firm s tax rate is 40%. Currently, the cost of equity, rsrs, is 11.5% as determined by the CAPM. What would be the estimated cost of equity if the firm used 60% debt?
Higgs Bassoon Corporation is a custom manufacturer of bassoons and other wind instruments. Its current value of operations, which is also its value of debt plus equity, is estimated to be $200 million. Higgs has $110 million face value, zero coupon debt that is due in 3 years. The risk-free rate is 5%, and the standard deviation of returns for similar companies is 60%. The owners of Higgs Bassoon view their equity investment as an option and would like to know the value of their investment. Using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model, how much is the equity worth? How much is the debt worth today? What is its yield? How much would the equity value and the yield on the debt change if Fethe's management were able to use risk management techniques to reduce its volatility to 45 percent? Can you explain this?