The accompanying graph depicts the marginal social cost (MSC) and marginal social benefit (MSB) of pollution emissions. Move the point, P, to the point representing the optimal level of pollution. What is the optimal quantity of pollution? metric tons The optimal quantity of pollution is not zero because: 1,000 Dollars 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 h 2 P 3 5 6 Metric tons of pollution 7 8 MSC MSB 9 10

The accompanying graph depicts the marginal social cost (MSC) and marginal social benefit (MSB) of pollution emissions. Move the point, P, to the point representing the optimal level of pollution. What is the optimal quantity of pollution? metric tons The optimal quantity of pollution is not zero because: 1,000 Dollars 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 h 2 P 3 5 6 Metric tons of pollution 7 8 MSC MSB 9 10

Principles of Economics 2e

2nd Edition

ISBN:9781947172364

Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro

Publisher:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro

Chapter12: Environmental Protection And Negative Externalities

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 38CTQ: How can high-income countries benefit from covering much of the cost of reducing pollution created...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

In the Land of Purity, there is only one form of pollution, called gunk. Table 12.14 shows possible combinations of economic output and reduction of gunk, depending on what kinds of environmental regulations you choose. Sketch a graph of a production possibility frontier with environmental quality on the horizontal axis, measured by the percentage reduction of gunk, and with the quantity of economic output on the vertical axis. Which choices display productive efficiency? How can you tell? Which choices show allocative efficiency? How can you tell? In the choice between K and L, can you say which one is better and why? In the choice between K. and N, can you say which one is better, and why? If you had to guess, which choice would you think is move likely to represent a command-and-control environmental policy and which choice is more likely to represent a market-oriented environmental policy, choice L or M? Why?
How can high-income countries benefit from covering much of the cost of reducing pollution created by low-income countries?
There are three industrial firms in Happy Valley.FirmInitial PollutionLevelCost of ReducingPollution by 1 UnitA 30 units $20B 40 units $30C 20 units $10The government wants to reduce pollution to 60 units,so it gives each firm 20 tradable pollution permits.a. Who sells permits and how many do they sell?Who buys permits and how many do they buy?Briefly explain why the sellers and buyers are eachwilling to do so. What is the total cost of pollutionreduction in this situation?b. How much higher would the costs of pollutionreduction be if the permits could not be traded?
Explain: “Without a market for pollution rights, dumping pollutants into the air or water is costless; in the presence of the right to buy and sell pollution rights, dumping pollutants creates an opportunity cost for the polluter.” What is the significance of this opportunity cost to the search for better technology to reduce pollution?
Use a graph to explain the benefits a farmer will experience if pollution of a nearby industry decreases.
There are three identical firms in Happy Valley. Firms Initial Pollution Level Cost of Reducing Pollution by 1 unit A 30 units $20 B 40 units $30 C 20 units $10 The government wants to reduce total pollution to 60 units, so it gives each firm 20 tradable permits. Who sells permits and how many do they sell? Who buys permits and how many do they buy? Briefly explain why the sellers and buyers are each willing to do so? What is the total cost of pollution reduction in this situation? How much larger would the cost of pollution reduction be if the permits could not be traded?
Use a graph to illustrate the quantity of pollution that would be emitted (a) after a corrective tax has been imposed and (b) after tradable pollution permits have been imposed. Could these two quantities ever be equivalent?
This graph represents the tobacco industry. IPrice 16 14 Social Cost 12 10 Private Cost 8 6 4 Demand 200 500 650 Quantity a) Without any government intervention, what is the market determined price and quantity? b) What is the price of the externality? c) What is the socially optimal price and quantity? d) What should the government do (impose a tax or provide a subsidy) to internalize this externality? What is the amount of the the corrective tax/subsidy needed to be to move the outcome from the market equilibrium to the socially-optimal outcome?
69 07 JO in Question 20 of 20 > The graph shows the marginal social benefit curve (MSB) and MSB/MSC marginal social cost curve (MSC) of pollution emissions. MSC For the 1st unit of pollution emissions, the MSB is $62 greater than the MSC. 54 35 Determine the socially optimal quantity of pollution emissions. 15. MSB 45 23. Quantity of pollution emissions (tons) 19 pollution emissions: tons 4. Activate Windows Go to Settings to activate V Will a market economy, without any government LAPTOP LOGIN HIGH DEFINITION E USERNAME: student PASSWORD: Broward1 TravelMate B F12 PrtSc Pau F8 F10 Scr Lk SysRq Br F5 NumLk 8. 8. 6 6 % 0
EOC 11.04 Two businesses, X and Y, each dump 20 tonnes of pollution into a creek. In an effort to reduce pollution, the government will now require businesses to have a pollution permit to dump pollutants in the creek. Each business receives 10 pollution permits and they can use it to pollute or sell it to the other business (but lose the ability to pollute). To reduce pollution it costs business X $100 per tonne of pollutant eliminated and it costs business Y $50 per tonne of pollutant eliminated. Once the two businesses have traded these permits with each other, what is the likely outcome? Select an answer and submit. For keyboard navigation, use the up/down arrow keys to select an answer. a business X emits 10 tonnes of pollutants and business Y emits 10 tonnes of pollutants. b business X no longer pollutes, and business Y will not lower the amount it pollutes. business X raises its pollution, and business Y will lower how much it pollutes. business Y no longer pollutes, and…
There are three industrial firms in the county. -Firm A's initial pollution level is 50 units. Its cost of reducing pollution by 1 unit is $30. -Firm B's initial pollution level is 40 units. Its cost of reducing pollution by 1 unit is $20.-Firm C's initial pollution level is 30 units. Its cost of reducing pollution by 1 unit is $40.The government wants to reduce pollution to 90 units so it gives each firm 30 tradable pollution permits.(i) Who sells permits? (ii) How many do they sell? (iii) Who buys permits? (iv) How many do they buy?
A city currently emits 16 million gallons (MG) of raw sewage into a lake that is beside the city. Table 12.13 shows the total costs (TC) in thousands of dollars of cleaning up the sewage to different levels, together with the total benefits (TB) of doing so. Benefits include environmental, recreational, health, and industrial benefits. TC TB 16 MG Current Current 12 MG 50 800 8 MG 150 1300 4 MG 500 1850 0 MG 1200 2000 Table 12.13 Using the information in Table 12.13 calculate the marginal costs and marginal benefits of reducing sewage emissions for this city. What is the optimal level of sewage for this city? How can you tell?