The author describes the case of the "Prisoner's Dilemma" to demonstrate which of the following? Competition and the pursuit of unfettered self-interest result in greater efficiency, and benefits everyone involved equally. Effective policy can place incentives in such a manner that the very pursuit of unfettered self-interest of the prisoners results in the desired outcome of getting both to confess to the crime. Just as in the case of the prisoner's dilemma, the pursuit of unfettered self-interest will cause the fishermen who fish Atlantic swordfish (a common resource) to harvest them wisely and limit the number of fish each fisherman catches. Thus the fishermen's ability to pursue

The author describes the case of the "Prisoner's Dilemma" to demonstrate which of the following? Competition and the pursuit of unfettered self-interest result in greater efficiency, and benefits everyone involved equally. Effective policy can place incentives in such a manner that the very pursuit of unfettered self-interest of the prisoners results in the desired outcome of getting both to confess to the crime. Just as in the case of the prisoner's dilemma, the pursuit of unfettered self-interest will cause the fishermen who fish Atlantic swordfish (a common resource) to harvest them wisely and limit the number of fish each fisherman catches. Thus the fishermen's ability to pursue

Economics For Today

10th Edition

ISBN:9781337613040

Author:Tucker

Publisher:Tucker

Chapter1: Introducing The Economic Way Of Thinking

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 7SQ

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Which of the following is true of a prisoner's dilemma? Players will be best off if they cooperate, but they have an incentive to follow their individual self-interest. Players will be best off if they cooperate, and they will have enough incentive to do so. Players will be best off if they follow their individual self-interest, but they have an incentive to cooperate. Players will have no incentive to take any particular action.
One of the critical moments early on in the The Lord of the Rings trilogy is the meeting in Rivendell to decide who should take the One Ring to Mordor. Gimli the Dwarf won’t hear of an Elf doing it, whereas Legolas (who is an Elf) feels similarly about Gimli. Boromir (who is a Man) is opposed to either of them taking charge of the Ring. And then there is Frodo the Hobbit, who has the weakest desire to take the Ring but knows that someone must throw it into the fires of Mordor. In modeling this scenario as a game, assume there are four players: Boromir, Frodo, Gimli, and Legolas. (There were more, of course, including Aragorn and Elrond, but let’s keep it simple.) Each of them has a preference ordering, shown in the following table, as to who should take on the task of carrying the One Ring. Of the three non-Hobbits, each prefers to take on the task himself. Each would prefer that other than themselves and Frodo, no one should take the Ring. As for Frodo, he doesn’t really want to do it…
Is the solution to the prisoner’s dilemma game a Nash equilibrium? Why? The solution to the prisoner’s dilemma game is a Nash equilibrium because no player can improve his or her payoff by changing strategy unilaterally. The solution to the prisoner’s dilemma game is not a Nash equilibrium because players do not end up in the best combination for both. The solution to the prisoner’s dilemma game is not a Nash equilibrium because both players can improve their payoffs by cooperating. The solution to the prisoner’s dilemma game is a Nash equilibrium because it is a noncooperative game in which both players have to expect that the other is purely selfish.
Select the term that best describes each definition listed in the following table. Definition Nash Equilibrium Dominant Strategy Collusion Tit-for-tat Strategy Payoff Matrix Prisoners' Dilemma Game A case in which individually rational behavior leads to a jointly inefficient outcome A player's best choice, if it exists, regardless of his or her opponent's strategy A strategy in which a player cooperates until the other player defects and then defects until the other player cooperates again The event that occurs when agents in a game form an agreement about which strategies to implement
Use the figures below to answer the following question. The figure on the left is the payoff matrix that represents the invisible hand game where two farmers decide which crop to plant, with the Nash equilibrium circled. The figure on the right illustrates the gains from trade realised in a perfectly competitive market. Discuss the common idea that is implied by both the invisible hand game and the perfectly competitive market.
In game theory, what is a subgame? What is a subgame-perfect Nash equilibrium? If possible, could you please provide an example? Thank you!
What are the possible causes of Prisoner’s Dilemma? Please list at least three mechanisms to overcome this dilemma.
Please solve the following problem using a game theory. Consider a scenario in which two companies, Company A and Company B, are competing for a government contract to supply a specific product. The government has set a maximum budget for the contract, and both companies want to maximize their profits. However, the government will only award the contract to the company with the lowest bid, and the companies have to submit sealed bids simultaneously. Company A and Company B both have two options: bid high or bid low. If both companies bid low, they will share the contract and split the profits equally. If one company bids low and the other bids high, the company bidding low will win the entire contract and maximize its profits, while the other company will receive nothing. If both companies bid high, neither will win the contract, and they will receive no profits. The profit structure is as follows (in millions of dollars): If both companies bid low: Company A gets $10 million, and…
Explain how organizations can collude to raise prices of products like sugar using the concept of market forces.
Using a payoff matrix/table to determine the equilibrium outcome Suppose there are only two firms that sell smartphones, Flashfone and Pictech. The following payoff matrix/table shows the profit (in millions of dollars) each company will earn, depending on whether it sets a high or low price for its phones. Pictech Pricing High Low Flashfone Pricing High 10, 10 4, 12 Low 12, 4 9, 9 For example, the lower left cell shows that if Flashfone prices low and Pictech prices high, Flashfone will earn a profit of $12 million and Pictech will earn a profit of $4 million. Assume this is a simultaneous game and that Flashfone and Pictech are both profit-maximizing firms. If Flashfone prices high, Pictech will make more profit if it chooses a price, and if Flashfone prices low, Pictech will make more profit if it chooses a price. If Pictech prices high, Flashfone will make more profit if it chooses a price, and if Pictech prices low, Flashfone will make…
Evolutionary game theory provides a framework for understanding the emergence of preferences and behavior. Why are theoretical methodologies that employ the rational actor model an evolutionary stable strategy for economists?
Suppose two players play the prisoners' dilemma game a finite number of times, both players are rational, and the game is played with complete information, is a tit-for-tat strategy optimal in this case? Explain using your own words.