The first mate of the Spanish fleet approaches Crusoe with a list in hand. He knows that Crusoe is a mystery economist and a financial wizard, so he does not even try to bargain. On the other hand, Crusoe, out of respect for the competitive market he "worships," he does not take advantage of the monopolistic situation. Taking goat for example, Crusoe is willing to sell goat at the following schedule (assuming linear functional form): 100 From his perfect knowledge of the Spanish fleet, he derives the following demand schedule (assuming linear functional form): . Quantity 0 1 C: P = 66 D: P = 66.5 1 2 1 Price 19 21 23 100 If both parties (Crusoe and the Spanish) are strictly following their own schedule, then: Question 2.1: What is the market equilibrium price and quantity? A: P = 158 Q=69.5 B: P = 159 Q=70 C: P = 160 D: P = 161 Q = 70.5 Q=71 219 Quantity Price 0 442 1 438 2 434 42 However, the captain does not want to spend too much money on goats, so he restricts the first mate to buy at the maximum of 150 pieces of silver; then: Question 2.2: What is the new market equilibrium quantity? A: P = 65 B: P = 65.5

The first mate of the Spanish fleet approaches Crusoe with a list in hand. He knows that Crusoe is a mystery economist and a financial wizard, so he does not even try to bargain. On the other hand, Crusoe, out of respect for the competitive market he "worships," he does not take advantage of the monopolistic situation. Taking goat for example, Crusoe is willing to sell goat at the following schedule (assuming linear functional form): 100 From his perfect knowledge of the Spanish fleet, he derives the following demand schedule (assuming linear functional form): . Quantity 0 1 C: P = 66 D: P = 66.5 1 2 1 Price 19 21 23 100 If both parties (Crusoe and the Spanish) are strictly following their own schedule, then: Question 2.1: What is the market equilibrium price and quantity? A: P = 158 Q=69.5 B: P = 159 Q=70 C: P = 160 D: P = 161 Q = 70.5 Q=71 219 Quantity Price 0 442 1 438 2 434 42 However, the captain does not want to spend too much money on goats, so he restricts the first mate to buy at the maximum of 150 pieces of silver; then: Question 2.2: What is the new market equilibrium quantity? A: P = 65 B: P = 65.5

Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies and Tactics (MindTap Course List)

14th Edition

ISBN:9781305506381

Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris

Publisher:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris

Chapter12: Price And Output Determination: Oligopoly

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1E

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

In an economy with two Individuals ( A and B) discuss the results in exchange in the following situations 1. Perfect competition in which A and B accept prices as given by the market 2.A is a monopolistic and can set any price B chooses 3 A is a perfect price discriminator and can charge a different price for each unit tranded. 4 does each of these lead to a pareto efficient Solution ? It would be useful to work with an Edgeworth Box Diagram to present your solution
Assume the market for a product can be described as a Cournot duopoly with two identical firms. The Nash-equilibrium in this market is that the two firms produce the same quantity. Hence, they will have identical market shares, each will have 50%. Assume that firm 1 decides to invest in a technology that reduces its marginal costs. a) What will happen to the two firms market shares? You must explain how you find the answer. b) What will happen to total production and the price of the product? Again, explain your answer.
Jane and Sara are competing orange juice salespersons in Amherst. Their stands are next to each other on a street and consumers regard them as identical. The marginal cost of an orange juice is $1. The demand for orange juice every hour is Q = 20 − P where P is the lowest price between the two salespersons. If their prices are equal they split demand equally. a. If they set prices simultaneously (prices can be any real number), what is the Nash equilibrium price? b. If, against what we have assumed in class, orange juice salespersons have to charge prices in whole dollars ($1, $2, $3, etc), what are the Nash equilibrium prices? c. Assuming whole dollar pricing, if Jane sets her price before Sara, what price would she charge? Answer all 3 parts
Let's say that the demand side of the market for Blue Soda is comprised of 3 leading agents/individuals: Anthony, Brad, and Claire. Let P be the price of 1 liter of Blue Soda, and Qd be the quantity demanded of Blue Soda in liters. Here are the key points to the problem: - Anthony buys only one liter of Blue Soda if the price of it falls below his choke price of $10. - Brad's demand for Blue Soda is defined by QdB = 5 - P/2 - Claire buys 2 liters if the price is below $5, 1 liter if the price is between $5 and $10, and nothing if the price is above $10. Using this information, please sketch the individual demands and the market demand by aggregating the three agents/individuals. Label the graph clearly. Please make sure to sketch the individual demands first and then sketch the market demand.
Consider the following Cournot model. The inverse demand function is given by p = 30 –Q, where Q = q1 + q2. Firm 1’s marginal cost is $6 (c1 = 6). Firm 2 uses a new technology so that its marginal cost is $3 (c2 = 3). There is no fixed cost. The two firms choose their quantities simultaneously and compete only once. (So it’s a one-shot simultaneous game.) Answer the following questions. (4points)DeriveFirm1andFirm2’sreactionfunctions, respectively. (2 points) Solve the Nash equilibrium (q1N, q2N). (2points)Whatistheequilibriumpriceandwhatistheprofitlevel for each firm? (3 points) Suppose there is a market for the technology used by Firm 2. What is the highest price that Firm 1 is willing to pay for this new technology? (3points)Nowlet’schangethesetupfromCournotcompetitionto Bertrand competition, while maintaining all other assumptions. What is the equilibrium price? (3 points) Suppose the two firms engage in Bertrand competition. What is the highest price that…
Suppose two companies, Apples and Dell, are a competing duopoly. If both companies charge the high price, they each earn $700 million in economic profit. If both companies charge the low price, they each earn $500 million in economic profit. If one company charges a high price and the other a low price, the company charging the higher price earns $450 million in economic profit and the company charging the lower price earns $800 million in economic profit. 1. What is the Nash equilibrium? Select all possible answers from the answer list. 2. Thinking back to your answer for the Nash equilibrium, can firms do better than the outcome you identified? Explain.
Consider two oligopolists, each choosing between a “high” and a “low” level of production. Given their choices of how much to produce, their profits will be as follows: Explain how firm B will reason that it makes sense to produce the high amount, regardless of what firm A chooses. Then explain how firm A will reason that it makes sense to produce the high amount, regardless of what firm B chooses. How might collusion assist the two firms in this case?
Explain the difference between a Bayesian-Nash Equilibrium and a Nash Equilibrium.
Three oligopolistic firms ("1", "2" and "3") conduct quantity competition in a certain market. The interactions between them take place as follows: firm 1 defines its production quantity, which is immediately observed by firms 2 and 3; then, firm 2 makes its decision on how much it will produce, and only after observing the decisions of firms 1 and 2 does firm 3 finally make its respective choice. Furthermore, the total costs of firms 1, 2 and 3 correspond respectively to c₁(q₁) = 10q₁, c₂(q₂) = 8q₂ and c₃(q₃) = 2q₃, and the firms face a (inverse) demand given by p(Q) = 110 - Q (where Q = q₁ + q₂ + q₃). Based on this information, determine what will be the total amount produced by the firms in the (single) ENPS for that game. (Note: the correct answer is an integer.)
Exercise 6.7. Suppose two identical companies produce wood stoves and they are the only ones on the market. Its costs are given by: C1 (q1 )=200q1 and C2 (q2) = 200q2. And the inverse market demand curve is: P=2000-2Q, where Q =q1 + q2 Get the Cournot-Nash equilibrium. Calculate the profits of each company. Show graphically. Suppose that the two companies form a cartel to maximize joint profits. How many stoves will you produce? Calculate the profits of each company. Represent graphically. Managers now note that explicit agreements to collude are illegal. Each company must decide on its own whether to produce the amount of Cournot or that of the cartel.
Suppose two firms, A and B, have a cost function of ?(??) = 30??, for ? = ?, ?. The inverse demand for the market is given by ? = 120 − ?, where Q represents the total quantity in the market, ? = ?? + ??. 1. Solve for the firms’ outputs in a Nash Equilibrium of the Cournot Model. 2. Let Firm A be the first mover, and Firm B be the second mover. Solve for the firms’ outputs in a SPNE of the Stackelberg Model.
Suppose that two Japanese companies, Hitachi and Toshiba, are the sole producers (i.e., duopolists) of a microprocessor chip used in a number of different brands of personal computers. Assume that total demand for the chips is fixed and that each firm charges the same price for the chips. Each firm’s market share and profits are a function of the magnitude of the promotional campaign used to promote its version of the chip. Also assume that only two strategies are available to each firm: a limited promotional campaign (budget) and an extensive promotional campaign (budget). If the two firms engage in a limited promotional campaign, each firm will earn a quarterly profit of $14 million. If the two firms undertake an extensive promotional campaign, each firm will earn a quarterly profit of $11 million. With this strategy combination, market share and total sales will be the same as for a limited promotional campaign, but promotional costs will be higher and hence profits will be lower.…