The following data were taken from the records of Griggs Company for December: Administrative expenses $100,800 Cost of goods sold (at standard) 550,000 Direct materials price variance-unfavorable 1,680 Direct materials quantity variance-favorable (560) Direct labor rate variance-favorable (1,120) Direct labor time variance-unfavorable 490 Variable factory overhead controllable variance-favorable (210) Fixed factory overhead volume variance-unfavorable 3,080 Interest expense 2,940 Sales 868,000 Selling expenses 125,000

The following data were taken from the records of Griggs Company for December: Administrative expenses $100,800 Cost of goods sold (at standard) 550,000 Direct materials price variance-unfavorable 1,680 Direct materials quantity variance-favorable (560) Direct labor rate variance-favorable (1,120) Direct labor time variance-unfavorable 490 Variable factory overhead controllable variance-favorable (210) Fixed factory overhead volume variance-unfavorable 3,080 Interest expense 2,940 Sales 868,000 Selling expenses 125,000

Financial And Managerial Accounting

15th Edition

ISBN:9781337902663

Author:WARREN, Carl S.

Publisher:WARREN, Carl S.

Chapter23: Evaluating Variances From Standard Costs

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 21E: Income statement indicating standard cost variances The following data were taken from the records...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Income statement indicating standard cost variances The following data were taken from the records of Griggs Company for December: Prepare an income statement for presentation to management.
Calculation of materials and labor variances Fritz Corp. manufactures and sells a single product. The company uses a standard cost system. The standard cost per unit of product follows: The charges to the manufacturing department for November, when 5,000 units were produced, follow: The Purchasing department normally buys about the same quantity as is used in production during a month. In November, 5,500 lb were purchased at a price of $2.90 per pound. Required: Calculate the following from standard costs for the data given, using the formulas on pages 421–422 and 424: Materials quantity variance. Materials purchase price variance (at time of purchase). Labor efficiency variance. Labor rate variance. Give some reasons as to why both the materials quantity variance and labor efficiency variance might be unfavorable.
Marten Company has a cost-benefit policy to investigate any variance that is greater than 1,000 or 10% of budget, whichever is larger. Actual results for the previous month indicate the following: The company should investigate: a. neither the materials variance nor the labor variance. b. the materials variance only. c. the labor variance only. d. both the materials variance and the labor variance.
Materials and labor variances Fausto Fabricators Inc. uses a standard cost system to account for its single product. The standards established for the product include the following: The following operating data came from the records for the month: In process, beginning inventory, none. In process, ending inventory, 800 units, 80% complete as to labor; material is issued at the beginning of processing. Completed during the month, 5,600 units. Materials issued to production were 51,680 lb @ .55 per pound. Direct labor was 384,000 for 40,000 hours worked. Required: Calculate the following variances, using the diagram format in Figure 8-4. 1. Materials price. 2. Materials quantity. 3. Net materials variance. 4. Labor rate. 5. Labor efficiency. 6. Net labor variance. (Hint: Before determining the standard quantity for materials and labor, you must first compute the equivalent units of production for materials and labor.)
Using variance analysis and interpretation Last year, Wrigley Corp. adopted a standard cost system. Labor standards were set on the basis of time studies and prevailing wage rates. Materials standards were determined from materials specifications and the prices then in effect. On June 30, the end of the current fiscal year, a partial trial balance revealed the following: Standards set at the beginning of the year have remained unchanged. All inventories are priced at standard cost. What conclusions can be drawn from each of the four variances shown in Wrigleys trial balance?
(Appendix) Calculating factory overhead: three variances Using the data given in E8-17, calculate the following overhead variances: a. Spending variance. b. Production-volume variance. c. Efficiency variance. d. Was the factory overhead under- or overapplied? By what amount? In all problems involving variances, use F and U to indicate favorable and unfavorable variances, respectively.
Direct materials and direct labor variance analysis Lenni Clothing Co. manufactures clothing in a small manufacturing facility. Manufacturing has 25 employees. Each employee presently provides 40 hours of productive labor per week. Information about a production week is as follows: Instructions Determine (A) the standard cost per unit for direct materials and direct labor; (B) the price variance, quantity variance, and total direct materials cost variance; and (C) the rate variance, time variance, and total direct labor cost variance.
Standard direct materials cost per unit from variance data The following data relating to direct materials cost for October of the current year are taken from the records of Good Clean Fun Inc., a manufacturer of organic toys: Determine the standard direct materials cost per unit of finished product, assuming that there was no inventory of work in process at either the beginning or the end of the month.
Madison Company uses the following rule to determine whether direct labor efficiency variances ought to be investigated. A direct labor efficiency variance will be investigated anytime the amount exceeds the lesser of 12,000 or 10 percent of the standard labor cost. Reports for the past five weeks provided the following information: Required: 1. Using the rule provided, identify the cases that will be investigated. 2. Suppose that investigation reveals that the cause of an unfavorable direct labor efficiency variance is the use of lower quality direct materials than are usually used. Who is responsible? What corrective action would likely be taken? 3. Suppose that investigation reveals that the cause of a significant favorable direct labor efficiency variance is attributable to a new approach to manufacturing that takes less labor time but causes more direct materials waste. Upon examining the direct materials usage variance, it is discovered to be unfavorable, and it is larger than the favorable direct labor efficiency variance. Who is responsible? What action should be taken? How would your answer change if the unfavorable variance were smaller than the favorable?
Direct materials and direct labor, variance analysis; factory overhead cost variance analysis Route 66 Tire Co. manufactures automobile tires. Standard costs and actual costs for direct materials, direct labor, and factory overhead incurred for the manufacture of 10.000 tires were as follows: Instructions Determine (a) the price variance, quantity variance, and total direct materials cost variance; (b) the rale variance, time variance, and total direct labor cost variance; and (c) Appendix: variable factory overhead controllable variance, the fixed factory overhead volume variance, and total factory overhead cost variance.
At the end of the current fiscal year, the trial balance of Big Apple Inc. revealed the following debit (unfavorable) balances: Flexible-Budget Variance — $2,000 Production–Volume Variance — $75,000 What conclusions can be drawn from these two variances?
Computing materials variances D-List Calendar Co. specializes in manufacturing calendars that depict obscure comedians. The company uses a standard cost system to control its costs. During one month of operations, the direct materials costs and the quantities of paper used showed the following: Calculate the following: 1. Total cost of purchases for the month 2. Materials purchase price variance 3. Materials quantity variance 4. Net materials variance