The following hypothetical production possibilities tables are for China and the United States. Assume that before specialization and trade the optimal product mix for China is alternative D and for the United States is alternative S. China Production Possibilities Product B D E F A 20,000 16,000 0 8 Apparel Chemicals (tons) C 12,000 16 0 8,000 24 4,000 32 40 U.S. Production Possibilities Product T U V W Apparel R S 60,000 48,000 0 12 0 36,000 24,0000 24 36 12,000 48 Chemicals (tons) 60 Instructions: Enter your answers as whole numbers. a. Are comparative-cost conditions such that the two countries should specialize? (Click to select) If so, what product should each produce? China should produce [(Click to select) The United States should produce [(Click to select) b. What is the total gain in apparel and chemical output that would result from such specialization? Apparel: units ton(s) Chemicals: c. What are the limits of the terms of trade? units of apparel for 1 ton of chemicals and units of apparel for 2 tons of chemicals.

The following hypothetical production possibilities tables are for China and the United States. Assume that before specialization and trade the optimal product mix for China is alternative D and for the United States is alternative S. China Production Possibilities Product B D E F A 20,000 16,000 0 8 Apparel Chemicals (tons) C 12,000 16 0 8,000 24 4,000 32 40 U.S. Production Possibilities Product T U V W Apparel R S 60,000 48,000 0 12 0 36,000 24,0000 24 36 12,000 48 Chemicals (tons) 60 Instructions: Enter your answers as whole numbers. a. Are comparative-cost conditions such that the two countries should specialize? (Click to select) If so, what product should each produce? China should produce [(Click to select) The United States should produce [(Click to select) b. What is the total gain in apparel and chemical output that would result from such specialization? Apparel: units ton(s) Chemicals: c. What are the limits of the terms of trade? units of apparel for 1 ton of chemicals and units of apparel for 2 tons of chemicals.

Brief Principles of Macroeconomics (MindTap Course List)

8th Edition

ISBN:9781337091985

Author:N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:N. Gregory Mankiw

Chapter3: Interdependence And The Gains Rrom Trade

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 6PA

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Review the numbers for Canada and Venezuela from Table 33.12 which describes how many barrels of oil and tons of lumber the workers can produce. Use these numbers to answer the rest of this question. Draw a production possibilities frontier for each country. Assume there are 100 workers in each country. Canadians and Venezuelans desire both oil and lumber. Canadians want at least 2,000 tons of lumber. Mark a point on their production possibilities where they can get at least 3,000 tons. Assume that the Canadians specialize completely because they figured out they have a comparative advantage in lumber. They are willing to give up 1,000 tons of lumber. How much oil should they ask for in return for this lumber to be as well off as they were with no trade? How much should they ask for if they want to gain from trading with Venezuela? Note: We can think of this ask as the relative price or trade price of lumber. Is the Canadian ask you identified in (b) also beneficial for Venezuelans? Use the production possibilities frontier graph for Venezuela to show that Venezuelans can gain from trade.
True or False: The source of comparative advantage must be natural elements like climate and mineral deposits. Explain.
In Japan, one worker can make 5 tons of rubber or 80 radios. In Malaysia, one worker can make 10 tons of rubber or 40 radios. Who has the absolute advantage in the production of rubber or radios? How can you tell? Calculate the opportunity cost of producing 80 additional radios in Japan and in Malaysia. (Your calculation may involve fractions, which is fine,) Which country has a comparative advantage in the production of radios? Calculate the opportunity cost of producing 10 additional tons of rubber in Japan and in Malaysia. Which country has a comparative advantage in producing rubber? In this example, does each country have an absolute advantage and a comparative advantage in the same good? In what product should Japan specialize? In what product should Malaysia specialize?
Table 33.15 shows how the average costs of production for semiconductors (the chips In computer memories) change as the quantity of semiconductors built at that factory increases. Based on these data, sketch a curve with quantity produced on the horizontal axis and average cost of production on the vertical axis. How does the curve illustrate economies of scale? If the equilibrium quantity of semiconductors demanded is 90,000, can this economy take full advantage of economies of scale? What about if quantity demanded is 70,000 semiconductors? 50,000 semiconductors? 30,000 semiconductors? Explain how international trade could make it possible for even a small economy to take full advantage of economies of scale, while also benefiting from competition and the variety offered by several producers.
France and Tunisia both have Mediterranean climates that are excellent for producing/harvesting green beans and tomatoes. In France it takes two hours for each worker to harvest green beans and two hours to harvest a tomato. Tunisian workers need only one hour to harvest the tomatoes but four hours to harvest green beans. Assume there are only two workers, one in each country, and each works 40 hours a week. Draw a production possibilities frontier for each country. Hint: Remember the production possibility frontier is the maximum that all workers can produce at a unit of time which, in this problem, is a week. Identify which country has the absolute advantage in green beans and which country has the absolute advantage in tomatoes. Identity which country has the comparative advantage. How much would France have to give up In terms of tomatoes to gain from trade? How much would it have to give up in terms of green beans?
How does comparative advantage lead to gains from trade?
Why might intra-industry trade seem surprising from the point of view of comparative advantage?