The following is the recorded earthquakes on South Carolina from August, 2016 to February, 2017. Use the data to find the residuals. Then draw a residual plot by hand. Use the residual plot to determine if the linear model is the best regression model for this data. MagnitudeDepth (km.)1.72.91.10.81.41.90.73.20.84.31.941.76.31.96.91.90.91.12 Source: USGS

The following is the recorded earthquakes on South Carolina from August, 2016 to February, 2017. Use the data to find the residuals. Then draw a residual plot by hand. Use the residual plot to determine if the linear model is the best regression model for this data. MagnitudeDepth (km.)1.72.91.10.81.41.90.73.20.84.31.941.76.31.96.91.90.91.12 Source: USGS

College Algebra

1st Edition

ISBN:9781938168383

Author:Jay Abramson

Publisher:Jay Abramson

Chapter4: Linear Functions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 38RE: For the following exercises, consider the data in Table 5, which shows the percent of unemployed in...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Olympic Pole Vault The graph in Figure 7 indicates that in recent years the winning Olympic men’s pole vault height has fallen below the value predicted by the regression line in Example 2. This might have occurred because when the pole vault was a new event there was much room for improvement in vaulters’ performances, whereas now even the best training can produce only incremental advances. Let’s see whether concentrating on more recent results gives a better predictor of future records. (a) Use the data in Table 2 (page 176) to complete the table of winning pole vault heights shown in the margin. (Note that we are using x=0 to correspond to the year 1972, where this restricted data set begins.) (b) Find the regression line for the data in part ‚(a). (c) Plot the data and the regression line on the same axes. Does the regression line seem to provide a good model for the data? (d) What does the regression line predict as the winning pole vault height for the 2012 Olympics? Compare this predicted value to the actual 2012 winning height of 5.97 m, as described on page 177. Has this new regression line provided a better prediction than the line in Example 2?
The following fictitious table shows kryptonite price, in dollar per gram, t years after 2006. t= Years since 2006 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 K= Price 56 51 50 55 58 52 45 43 44 48 51 Make a quartic model of these data. Round the regression parameters to two decimal places.
For the following exercises, use Table 4 which shows the percent of unemployed persons 25 years or older who are college graduates in a particular city, by year. Based on the set of data given in Table 5, calculate the regression line using a calculator or other technology tool, and determine the correlation coefficient. Round to three decimal places of accuracy
For the following exercises, consider this scenario: The profit of a company decreased steadily overa ten-year spam.The following ordered pairs shows dollars and the number of units sold in hundreds and the profit in thousands ofover the ten-year span, (number of units sold, profit) for specific recorded years: (46,600),(48,550),(50,505),(52,540),(54,495). Use linear regression to determine a function Pwhere the profit in thousands of dollars depends onthe number of units sold in hundreds.
For the following exercises, use Table 4 which shows the percent of unemployed persons 25 years or older who are college graduates in a particular city, by year. Determine whether the trend appears linear. If so, and assuming the trend continues, find a linear regression model to predict the percent of unemployed in a given year to three decimal places.
For the following exercises, consider the data in Table 5, which shows the percent of unemployed in a city ofpeople25 years or older who are college graduates is given below, by year. 41. Based on the set of data given in Table 7, calculatethe regression line using a calculator or othertechnology tool, and determine the correlationcoefficient to three decimal places.
For the following exercises, consider the data in Table 5, which shows the percent of unemployed ina city of people 25 years or older who are college graduates is given below, by year. 40. Based on the set of data given in Table 6, calculate the regression line using a calculator or other technology tool, and determine the correlation coefficient to three decimal places.
Cable TV The following table shows the number C. in millions, of basic subscribers to cable TV in the indicated year These data are from the Statistical Abstract of the United States. Year 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 C 9.8 17.5 35.4 50.5 60.6 60.6 a. Use regression to find a logistic model for these data. b. By what annual percentage would you expect the number of cable subscribers to grow in the absence of limiting factors? c. The estimated number of subscribers in 2005 was 65.3million. What light does this shed on the model you found in part a?
Table 6 shows the population, in thousands, of harbor seals in the Wadden Sea over the years 1997 to 2012. a. Let x represent time in years starting with x=0 for the year 1997. Let y represent the number of seals in thousands. Use logistic regression to fit a model to these data. b. Use the model to predict the seal population for the year 2020. c. To the nearest whole number, what is the limiting value of this model?
What does the y -intercept on the graph of a logistic equation correspond to for a population modeled by that equation?
For the following exercises, consider the data in Table 5, which shows the percent of unemployed in a city of people 25 years or older who are college graduates is given below, by year. 38. Determine whether the trend appears to be linear.If so, and assuming the trend continues, find alinear regression model to predict the percent of unemployed in a given year to three decimal places.
The following is the recorded earthquakes on South Carolina from August, 2016 to February, 2017. Use the data to find the residuals. Then draw a residual plot by hand. Use the residual plot to determine if the linear model is the best regression model for this data. Magnitude Depth (km.) 1.7 2.9 1.1 0.8 1.4 1.9 0.7 3.2 0.8 4.3 1.9 4 1.7 6.3 1.9 6.9 1.9 0.9 1.1 2