What is the difference between production possibilities frontiers that are bowed out and those that are linear? Bowed out production possibilities frontiers illustrate tradeoffs, whereas linear production possibilities frontiers do not. O Bowed out production possibilities frontiers show increasing opportunity cost, whereas linear ones show constant opportunity cost. Bowed out production possibilities frontiers are the result of perfectly adaptable resources whereas linear production possibilities frontiers are not. Bowed out production possibilities frontiers illustrate real world conditions less than linear production possibilities frontiers.

What is the difference between production possibilities frontiers that are bowed out and those that are linear? Bowed out production possibilities frontiers illustrate tradeoffs, whereas linear production possibilities frontiers do not. O Bowed out production possibilities frontiers show increasing opportunity cost, whereas linear ones show constant opportunity cost. Bowed out production possibilities frontiers are the result of perfectly adaptable resources whereas linear production possibilities frontiers are not. Bowed out production possibilities frontiers illustrate real world conditions less than linear production possibilities frontiers.

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter18: Asymmetric Information

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 18.2P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Suppose the total benefit derived from a given decision, Q, is B(Q) = 20Q – 2Q2 and the corresponding total cost is C(Q) = 4 + 2Q2.Instructions: Use a negative sign (-) where appropriate and round up your answers to no decimal. Do not round values if needed to complete other calculations.a. What is total benefit when Q = 2? Q = 10?When Q = 2: $ When Q = 10: $ b. What is marginal benefit when Q = 2? Q = 10?When Q = 2: $ When Q = 10: $ c. What level of Q maximizes total benefit? Q = units. d. What is marginal cost when Q = 2? Q = 10?When Q = 2: $ When Q = 10: $ e. What level of Q maximizes net benefits? Q =
Consider the production of handmade rugs and assembly robots in India and Canada. Assume that Canada is relatively abundant in capital and that India is relative abundant in labour. Furthermore assume that the production technology for rugs and robots is the same in both countries. Draw production possibilities frontiers for each country keeping the production of rugs in the horizontal axis and the production of robots in the vertical axis. Assuming that consumer preferences are the same in both countries, add indifference curves and relative price lines under autarky. What are the differences in the relative price of rugs between the countries under autarky?
In some ways the state of the world economy is less hostile today than when (then) finance minister Tito Mboweni read his Budget Speech a year ago. Global economic growth rebounded significantly in 2021, after the decimation brought about by the Covid-19 induced recession in 2020.One of the outcomes of this was a sharp recovery in commodity prices, which has resulted in much higher-than-expected mining tax revenue in South Africa. This, in turn, has provided some welcome – albeit limited – breathing space on the fiscal front.The local economy is thought to have grown by more than 4.5 percent in 2021 – the highest annual increase in more than a decade. On balance, the finance minister should be able to meet spending demands (including the extension of the Sassa payments) for the year ahead, without widening the Budget deficit or resorting to punitive upwards adjustments to tax rates.” Define fiscal policy Describe the role of the budget in fiscal policy. Discuss how the policy…
Scenario 2 Tess and Lex earn $40,000 per year and all earnings are spent on consumption (c). Tess and Lex both have the utility function ( sqrt c) . Both could experience an adverse event that results in earnings of $0 per year. Tess has a 1% chance of experiencing an adverse event and Lex has a 12% chance of experiencing an adverse event. Tess and Lex are both aware of their risk of an adverse event. Refer to Scenario 2 Calculate Lex’s and Tess' expected utilities without insurance. (each one separated) Round to two decimal places for both
Whether a certain criterion is determinant or not is independent of the situation in which a product is consumed. True False In the context of disposing of consumer refuse, recycling cuts down on garbage while providing raw materials for other new products. True False Which of the following is a fundamental emotion evoked by positive, anticipatory appraisals that signal uncertainty about a positive outcome? a. Hope b. Confusion c. Surprise d. Pride Which of the following best describes chronic, repetitive purchasing behaviors that are in response to negative events or feelings? a. Addictive consumption b. Impulsive purchasing c. Window shopping d. Compulsive buying Retaliatory revenge is when a consumer yells insults and makes a public scene in an effort to harm the business. True False
Daniel and Kevin are two hardworking builders for solo, independently-owned companies. They can produce Chairs and Tables. As a result, they each have PPFs (Possibilities Production Frontiers) that illustrate their production. Daniel's PPF is shown by the equation: Qc = 12 - 3Qt. Likewise, Kevin's PPF is shown by the equation: Qt = 12 - 3Qc. Since they trust each other and are honest in their terms, Daniel and Kevin trade with each other and only each other; they do not take their goods to markets, and they do not interact with outside sellers/buyers. Since they want to make sure that they provide for their families in the most fair way possible, they set up and agree upon a few terms of trade. The terms are as follows: FIRST, the terms of trade are 1 Chair in exchange for 1 Table. SECOND, each of them specializes according to their own comparative advantage. THIRD, since Kevin needs a few extra things, he CONSUMES 3 units of the goods that he produces. With that said, I have a few…
Joe's search costs are $5 per search. He wants to buy a smart watch for his wife for Christmas, and the lowest price he's found so far is $300. Joe thinks 80 percent of the stores charge $300 for smart watches and 20 percent charge $200. Joe's optimal decision is to Multiple Choice continue to search for a lower price since the expected benefit of an additional search is $20, which exceeds his per-unit search costs. continue to search for a lower price since the expected benefit of an additional search is $80, which exceeds his per-unit search costs. stop searching and purchase a video player for $300. continue to search for a lower price since the expected benefit of an additional search is $100, which exceeds his per-unit search costs.
What is Time Consistency? Select one: a. None of the above b. a situation in which an agent, planner or objective maximizer must make a choice about an action or decision in a future plan which is optimal at a later date but is not optimal initially c. Refers to a situation in which a policy results in varying results d. a situation in which an agent, planner or objective maximizer must make a choice about an action or decision in a future plan which is optimal initially but is no longer optimal at a later date
(Bets as insurance) Suppose that P1 = P2 = P, that P(Y = 1) = P(Y = 2) = ½, that if Y (ω) = 1, then (W1, W2)(ω) = (1, 0), and that if Y (ω) = 2, then (W1, W2)(ω) = (0, 1). Show that if u1 and u2 are strictly concave, increasing expected utility functions, there are acceptable bets making both strictly better off. Show that this is not true if u1 and u2 are linear.
(This is an intermediate mircoeconomics question) Arif and Aisha agree to meet for a date at a local dance club next week. In their enthusiasm, they forget to agree which venue will be the site of their meeting. Luckily the town has only two dancing venues, Palms and Oasis. Having discussed their tastes in dancing venues last week, both know that Arif prefers Palms to the Oasis and Aisha prefers the Oasis to Palms. In fact, their payoffs reflect that if both go to Oasis, Aisha’s utility is 3 and Arif’s 2, while if both go to Palms Arif’s utility is 3 and Aisha’s is 2. If they do not go to the same venue, then they both have a utility of 0. (a) Write the payoff matrix and explain whether there are any pure Nash equilibria. Carefully explain what these are and why. Comment on the existence of any dominant strategy equilibria. (b) Please calculate mixed strategy equilibria, if any, and then derive the probability that Arif and Aisha will find themselves at the same venue. (Carefully…
Though it is assumed that people act rationally, in some markets, we haveseen volatile prices exacerbated by irrational exuberance. Consumers havebeen caught up in a market frenzy. Hoping that rising prices will make themricher – and expecting prices to keep rising. Developments in the economy,which has resulted in the emergence of a middle income class, taste of luxury goods, influx of foreign investors and a maturing property market has opened the window for investment opportunities in retail developments, thus leading to rise of shopping malls in the country. This some also argue that it affects the local traditional markets in the country. How relevant is this normative narrative?
Suppose that the buyers do not know the quality of any particular bicycle for sale, but the sellers do knowthe quality of the bike they sell. The price at which a bike is traded is determined by demand and supply.Each buyer wants at most one bicycle.(ii) Assuming that each buyer purchases a bike only if its expected quality is higher than the price,and each seller is willing to sell their bike only if the price exceeds their valuation, what is theequilibrium outcome in this market?