Which of the following best describes an "opportunity cost"? Group of answer choices costs that were incurred in the past and cannot be changed The distribution of all products to be sold Expected future costs that differs among alternatives Benefits foregone by not choosing an alternative course of action

Which of the following best describes an "opportunity cost"? Group of answer choices costs that were incurred in the past and cannot be changed The distribution of all products to be sold Expected future costs that differs among alternatives Benefits foregone by not choosing an alternative course of action

Survey of Accounting (Accounting I)

8th Edition

ISBN:9781305961883

Author:Carl Warren

Publisher:Carl Warren

Chapter12: Differential Analysis And Product Pricing

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 5SEQ

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Why are there objections to using absorption costing when segment reports of profitability are being prepared?
Which type of incurred costs are not relevant in decision-making (i.e., they have no bearing on future events) and should be excluded in decision-making? A. avoidable costs B. unavoidable costs C. sunk costs D. differential costs
Can direct materials ever be irrelevant in a make-or-buy decision? Explain. Give an example of a fixed cost that is relevant.
Which of the following is one of the two approaches used to analyze data in the decision to keep or discontinue a segment? A. comparing contribution margins and fixed costs B. comparing contribution margins and variable costs C. comparing gross margin and variable costs D. comparing total contribution margin under each alternative
What is a general rule to remember with respect to a sell-or-process-further environment, and what costs are irrelevant to the decision?
Which of the following best describes an "opportunity cost"? Expected future costs that differ among alternatives None of the items in this list of answers. Costs that were incurred in the past and cannot be changed The distribution of all products to be sold
Which of the following statements is false? (You may select more than one answer.)a. Under some circumstances, a sunk cost may be a relevant cost.b. Future costs that do not differ between alternatives are irrelevant.c. The same cost may be relevant or irrelevant depending on the decision context.d. Only variable costs are relevant costs. Fixed costs cannot be relevant costs.
i.“Differential Costs” are considered as relevant, where as “sunk Cost ” is considered asirrelevant for decision making purposes. Explain ii. Why opportunity cost is measured and relate with the evaluation of alternative, can it bean opportunity loss? iii. Which one either spoiled goods or defective goods are less economical for the companyand why?
Which one of the following statement is not correct? Group of answer choices -Opportunity costs are only considered when resources are limited. -Break-even analysis is used to determine how many units of a product or a service a business has to sell to cover all its costs. -Both fixed and variable costs influence short-term decision-making. -Short-term decision-making is all about analysing those costs that will change as a result of taking a particular action.
Which of the following is not an application of cost-volume-profit analysis? Setting prices for products and services. Performing strategic “what-if” analyses. Deciding whether to cut a product line. Determining the short-term cost or profit implications of many decisions. Deciding whether to make or buy a given product or service.
In a make versus buy decision which of thefollowing factors is not relevant? fixed production costsreliability of supplierreliability of bought-in productsopportunity cost of alternative activities
ABC Co.,is analyzing whether to expand operations by adding a new product line. Which of the following choices correctly identifies the costs that should be considered in this decision? none of the costs noted opportunity costs only sunk costs only