Which of the following statements is the proper interpretation of the result regarding the IRR of rotavirus gastroenteritis for the vaccine cohort compared to the control cohort, and its 95% confidence interval? O Infants in the vaccine cohort had a 33% greater risk of rotavirus gastroenteritis relative to infants in the control cohort. This increased risk is not explained by random sampling variability as the 95% confidence interval does not include 0. Infants in the vaccine cohort had a 33% greater risk of rotavirus gastroenteritis relative to infants in the control cohort. This increased risk is not explained by random sampling variability as the 959% confidence interval does not include 1. O Infants in the vaccine cohort had a 33% lower risk of rotavirus gastroenteritis relative to infants in the control cohort. This decreased risk is not explained by random sampling variability as the 95% confidence interval does not include 0. Infants in the vaccine cohort had a 33% lower risk of rotavirus gastroenteritis relative to infants in the control cohort. This decreased risk is not explained by random sampling variability as the 95% confidence interval does not include 1.

College Algebra (MindTap Course List)
12th Edition
ISBN:9781305652231
Author:R. David Gustafson, Jeff Hughes
Publisher:R. David Gustafson, Jeff Hughes
Chapter8: Sequences, Series, And Probability
Section8.7: Probability
Problem 58E: What is meant by the sample space of an experiment?
icon
Related questions
Topic Video
Question

A 2017 article in The New England Journal of Medicine details the results of a randomized clinical trial designed to evaluate the efficacy of a rotavirus gastroenteritis vaccine designed for infants. As per the authors:

“Each year, rotavirus gastroenteritis is responsible for about 37% of deaths from diarrhea among children younger than 5 years of age worldwide, with a disproportionate effect in sub-Saharan Africa. We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled trial in Niger to evaluate the efficacy of a live, oral bovine rotavirus pentavalent vaccine (BRV-PV, Serum Institute of India) to prevent severe rotavirus gastroenteritis. Healthy infants received three doses of the vaccine or placebo at 6, 10, and 14 weeks of age. Episodes of rotavirus gastroenteritis were assessed through active and passive surveillance.”

The following Kaplan-Meier curves show the time to a diagnosis of rotavirus gastroenteritis separately for the vaccine and placebo samples. Infants were followed for up to 60 weeks after receiving the third dose of the vaccine (or placebo), until they either developed rotavirus gastroenteritis or were censored (lost to follow-up, or still rotavirus gastroenteritis free after 60 weeks from randomization).

Which of the following statements is the proper interpretation of the result regarding the IRR of rotavirus
gastroenteritis for the vaccine cohort compared to the control cohort, and its 95% confidence interval?
Infants in the vaccine cohort had a 33% greater risk of rotavirus gastroenteritis relative to infants in the control
cohort. This increased risk is not explained by random sampling variability as the 95% confidence interval does not
include 0.
Infants in the vaccine cohort had a 336 greater risk of rotavirus gastroenteritis relative to infants in the control
cohort. This increased risk is not explained by random sampling variability as the 95% confidence interval does not
include 1.
Infants in the vaccine cohort had a 33% lower risk of rotavirus gastroenteritis relative to infants in the control
cohort. This decreased risk is not explained by random sampling variability as the 95% confidence interval does not
include 0.
Infants in the vaccine cohort had a 33% lower risk of rotavirus gastroenteritis relative to infants in the control
cohort. This decreased risk is not explained by random sampling variability as the 95% confidence interval does not
include 1.
Transcribed Image Text:Which of the following statements is the proper interpretation of the result regarding the IRR of rotavirus gastroenteritis for the vaccine cohort compared to the control cohort, and its 95% confidence interval? Infants in the vaccine cohort had a 33% greater risk of rotavirus gastroenteritis relative to infants in the control cohort. This increased risk is not explained by random sampling variability as the 95% confidence interval does not include 0. Infants in the vaccine cohort had a 336 greater risk of rotavirus gastroenteritis relative to infants in the control cohort. This increased risk is not explained by random sampling variability as the 95% confidence interval does not include 1. Infants in the vaccine cohort had a 33% lower risk of rotavirus gastroenteritis relative to infants in the control cohort. This decreased risk is not explained by random sampling variability as the 95% confidence interval does not include 0. Infants in the vaccine cohort had a 33% lower risk of rotavirus gastroenteritis relative to infants in the control cohort. This decreased risk is not explained by random sampling variability as the 95% confidence interval does not include 1.
100-
100-
80-
Vaccine
98니
60어
96-
Placebo
94-
40-
92니
90-
20-
10
20
30
40
50
60
10
20
30
40
50
60
Week
No. at Risk
Vaccine
2044
2012
1964
1767
1500
1429
1326
1326
Placebo
2047
1990
1916
1676
1148
662
The incidence rate ratio (and 95% confidence interval) of rotavirus gastroenteritis for the vaccine group compared to the
placebo group is 0.67 (0.55, 0.82)
Freedom from Severe Rotavirus
Gastroenteritis (%)
Transcribed Image Text:100- 100- 80- Vaccine 98니 60어 96- Placebo 94- 40- 92니 90- 20- 10 20 30 40 50 60 10 20 30 40 50 60 Week No. at Risk Vaccine 2044 2012 1964 1767 1500 1429 1326 1326 Placebo 2047 1990 1916 1676 1148 662 The incidence rate ratio (and 95% confidence interval) of rotavirus gastroenteritis for the vaccine group compared to the placebo group is 0.67 (0.55, 0.82) Freedom from Severe Rotavirus Gastroenteritis (%)
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Hypothesis Tests and Confidence Intervals for Proportions
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
College Algebra (MindTap Course List)
College Algebra (MindTap Course List)
Algebra
ISBN:
9781305652231
Author:
R. David Gustafson, Jeff Hughes
Publisher:
Cengage Learning