Which statement is true? O The fewest number of people in the United States are in the middle class. O The least number of people in the United States are in the working class. O The greatest number of pcople in the United States are in the working class. The largest number of people in the United States are in the middle class.

Which statement is true? O The fewest number of people in the United States are in the middle class. O The least number of people in the United States are in the working class. O The greatest number of pcople in the United States are in the working class. The largest number of people in the United States are in the middle class.

Principles of Economics 2e

2nd Edition

ISBN:9781947172364

Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro

Publisher:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro

Chapter20: Economic Growth

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 4SCQ: Assume there are two countries: South Korea and the United States. South Korea grows at 4 and the...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Suppose 3 million high school graduates start college each year. Those who earn a college degree will do so in four years. However, some students will drop out along the way. The first-year attrition rate is 20 percent, while the second- and third-year attrition rates are 10 and 2.5 percent respectively. a. What is the distribution of college students by year in college? How many students graduate from college each year?b. Believing that education is the key to the future, a presidential candidate proposes that the federal government pay the first $3,000 of college expenses each year for everyone attending a four-year college. It is expected that this proposal will encourage 1 million more high school graduates to enroll in a four-year college each year. Of these 1 million new college students, the first-, second-, and third-year attrition rates are 40, 20, and 5 percent. Why is it likely that attrition rates will be higher among these groups of students? c. What is the yearly…
(Please explain with graphic) Suppose that a consumer cannot vary hours of work as he or she chooses. In particular, he or she must choose between working q hours and not working at all, where q > 0. Suppose that dividend income is zero, and that the consumer pays a tax T if he or she works, and receives a benefit b when not working, interpreted as an unemployment insurance payment. a. If the wage rate increases, how does this affect the consumer’s hours of work? What does this have to say about what we would observe about the behavior of actual consumers when wages change? Explained also with the graph b. Suppose that the unemployment insurance benefit increases. How will this affect hours of work? Explain the implications of this for unemployment insurance programs. Explained also with the graph
Poverty is measured by O one's lifestyle. O the cost of living where one lives. O one's income. O All of the above
Pls answer in simple words : Are extremes of wealth and poverty desirable ?
There is evidence that, other things equal, a 10 percent increase in the number of workers having a particular skill level leads to about a 4 percent decline in wages for workers with that skill level. In addition, this 10-to-4 ratio appears to hold true whether the increase in labor supply is caused by domestic changes in labor supply or by an influx of foreign immigrants. a. Suppose that 42,000 computer programmers work in Silicon Valley. If the number of computer programmers in Silicon Valley increases by 1,260 because of a change in U.S. immigration laws, by how many percentage points would you expect the wage of computer programmers to fall in Silicon Valley? b. Suppose that 8,000 full-time cooks work in restaurants in the Denver area. If Denver becomes popular both with U.S. citizens and with foreigners such that 400 full-time cooks move to Denver from other parts of the United States while 80 full-time cooks move to Denver from other countries, by how much would you expect the…
In a competitive market economy, how is the distribution of income primarily determined? a.By the number of firms in the market for goods and services b.By the ownership of resources and human capital in the economy c.By the government d.Can be changed so that everyone is left better off while none are made worse off
Assume there are two countries: South Korea and the United States. South Korea grows at 4 and the United States grows at 1. For the sake of simplicity, assume they both start from the same fictional income level, 10,000. What will the incomes of the United States and South Korea he in 20 years? By how many multiples will each countrys income grow in 20 years?
a. What are reasons why an increase in income may lead to a desire for more children? b. What are reasons why an increase in income may lead to a desire for fewer children? c. Empirically, what relationship do we observe between income and number of children?
Need Step by Step answer: How to draft on Excel. Because Income depends on work effort and work effort depends on nutrition, suppose the relationship between income (Y) and total food availability (F) in a poor household is given by: Y = 10F + 20F2 – 0.6F3 a) If food availability in a two-person household is 20, would it be “rational” to share the food? Explain. b) If food availability in a two-person household is 30, would it be “rational” to share the food? Explain.
When recording devices were first invented morethan 100 years ago, musicians could suddenly supplytheir music to large audiences at low cost. How doyou suppose this development affected the income ofthe best musicians? How do you suppose it affectedthe income of average musicians?
Discuss each of the following: 1. How does household income affect the desire of a parent to have children? 2. How does religion affect the desire of a parent to have children?
Consider an employee who does not receive employer-based health insurance and must divide her $10,000 per week in after-tax income between health insurance and "other goods." Draw this worker's opportunity set if the price of health insurance is $2,000 per week and the price of "other goods" is $1,000 per week. On the same graph, illustrate how the opportunity set would change if the employer agreed to give this employee $2,000 worth of health insurance per week (under current tax laws, this form of compensation is nontaxable). Would this employee be better or worse off if, instead of the health insurance, the employer gave her a $2,000 per week raise that was taxable at a rate of 25 percent? Explain.