With the payoff matrix presented below which shows the annual profits for alternative pricing decisions encountered by two firms in a duopoly (assuming that production costs are similar): Firm 2 Firm 1 Charge low price 1: $15M; 2: $15M Charge low price Charge high price 1: $30M; 2: $10M 1: $25M; 2: $25M Charge high price 1: $10M; 2: $30M ➤What is the best (dominant) pricing decision for Firm 1? Why? What is the best (dominant) pricing decision for Firm 2? Why? If both firms choose to cooperate and agree on pricing, which pricing decision will they both follow? How can each firm make sure that the other firm will follow their pricing agreement and

With the payoff matrix presented below which shows the annual profits for alternative pricing decisions encountered by two firms in a duopoly (assuming that production costs are similar): Firm 2 Firm 1 Charge low price 1: $15M; 2: $15M Charge low price Charge high price 1: $30M; 2: $10M 1: $25M; 2: $25M Charge high price 1: $10M; 2: $30M ➤What is the best (dominant) pricing decision for Firm 1? Why? What is the best (dominant) pricing decision for Firm 2? Why? If both firms choose to cooperate and agree on pricing, which pricing decision will they both follow? How can each firm make sure that the other firm will follow their pricing agreement and

Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies and Tactics (MindTap Course List)

14th Edition

ISBN:9781305506381

Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris

Publisher:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris

Chapter12: Price And Output Determination: Oligopoly

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1E

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Suppose that the pricing strategies for FiberOne and of Starlink are shown in the table below. They have to decide whether to charge a high or low price for their internet service. The four pairs of payoff values show what each company expects to earn or lose in millions of dollars, depending on what the other company does.FiberOne’s Price StrategyStarlink’s Price StrategyHigh Price Low PriceHigh Price Starlink+$200 FiberOne +$200 Starlink+$500 FiberOne - $100Low Price Starlink-$100 FiberOne + 500 Starlink+$100 FiberOne +$100If it’s expected that the incomes of people living in rural Nigeria is expected to increase, what will the equilibrium outcome be, ceteris paribus?a) a) Starlink will charge a low price; FiberOne will charge a high price.b) b) Starlink will charge a high price; FiberOne will charge a low price.c) c) Both Starlink and FiberOne will charge a low price.d) d) Both Starlink and FiberOne will charge a high price.
Explain all will rate what is always true for a pure nash equilibrium of a two-person non zero-sum game A.No player can improve his payoff with a unilateral change of strategy B. it is a Pareto maximum of the payoff matrix C. No player can worsen the payoff of his opponent with a unilateral change of strategy D. It gives worse payoffs to both players than any berge equilibrium
Joe and Rebecca are small-town ready-mix concrete duopolists. The market demand function is Qd = 10,000 – 100P, where P is the price of a cubic yard of concrete and Qd is the number of cubic yards demanded per year. Marginal cost is $25 per cubic yard. Suppose that Joe and Rebecca compete in quantities and competition in this market is described by Cournot model. What are Joe and Rebecca’s Nash equilibrium outputs? What is the resulting price? What do they each earn as profit? How does the price compare to the marginal cost? Joe and Rebecca are small-town ready-mix concrete duopolists. The market demand function is Qd = 10,000 – 100P, where P is the price of a cubic yard of concrete and Qd is the number of cubic yards demanded per year. Marginal cost is $25 per cubic yard. Suppose that Joe and Rebecca compete in quantities and competition in this market is described by Cournot model. What are Joe and Rebecca’s Nash equilibrium outputs? What is the resulting price? What do they each…
q52 If you advertise and your rival advertises, you each will earn 14 million in profits. If neither of you advertises, you will each earn 20 million in profits. However, if one of you advertises and the other does not, the firm that advertises will earn 10 million and the non-advertising firm will earn 16 million. If you and your rival plan to be in business for only one year, the Nash equilibrium is a. for each firm to advertise. b. for the other firm to advertise and your firm not to advertise. c. for your firm to advertise and the other not to advertise. d. for neither firm to advertise.
1. Prove that every trembling-hand perfect equilibrium (for the agent normal form) is sequential. Show by example that the converse is false. The remaining problems in this chapter concern game-theoretic variations on the classic models of oligopoly. They are primarily about those models and so relate more to material in other chapters, but they could not have been posed until we had covered Nash equilibria and sub game perfection. 2. Prove that in the Bertrand game, if prices must be charged in integer multiples of a penny, then there is always at least one Nash equilibrium in which players do not use weakly dominated strategies.
Is the game shown by Figure 11.3 in the chapter (not this appendix) a zero-sum game or is it a positive-sum game? How can you tell? Are there dominant strategies in this game? If so, what are they? What cell represents a Nash equilibrium and why? Explain why it is so difficult for Uptown and RareAir to achieve and maintain a more favorable cell than the Nash equilibrium in this single-period pricing game.
Consider a situation where two firms, 1 and 2, compete by choosing prices simultaneously. Theycan either compete (charge a low price) or cooperate (collude, charging a high price). The firmsplay this competition game repeatedly and indefinitely, using a grim trigger strategy toincentivize cooperation. They use the same interest rate, i, to discount future payoffs. Payoffsare $4,050 when both firms cooperate and $3,600 when they compete. If one firm charge a lowprice while the other charges a high price, the firm charging the low price gets $7,200, and theother gets zero, but now assume there is a 10% chance that aregulatory agency will give both firms a $1,500 fine in each period if they are caught colluding.Find the condition on the interest rate, i , necessary for sustaining the cooperative equilibrium.Which of the following statements is correct?(a) For any i < 1/7 the firms will cooperate.(b) For any i < 1/11 the firms will cooperate.(c) For any i > 1/11 the firms will…
Two oligopolistic firms have to decide on the pricing strategy. Each can either choose either a high or a low price. If they both choose a high price, each will make $12 million, but if they both choose a low price, each will make $ 8 million. If one sets a high price and other a low one, the low-priced firm will make $16 million, but the high-priced firm will make only $4 million. It is illegal for each firm to communicate with each other. a) Which strategy would both of them ultimately opt for? b) What would be the pay-off for this strategy?
Consider a “punishment” variation of the two-firm oligopoly situation shown in Figure 14.1. Suppose that if one firm sets a low price while the other sets a high price, then the firm setting the high price can fine the firm setting the low price. Suppose that whenever a fine is imposed, X dollars is taken from the low-price firm and given to the high-price firm. What is the smallest amount that the fine X can be such that both firms will want to always set the high price?
Exercise 6.7. Suppose two identical companies produce wood stoves and they are the only ones on the market. Its costs are given by: C1 (q1 )=200q1 and C2 (q2) = 200q2. And the inverse market demand curve is: P=2000-2Q, where Q =q1 + q2 Get the Cournot-Nash equilibrium. Calculate the profits of each company. Show graphically. Suppose that the two companies form a cartel to maximize joint profits. How many stoves will you produce? Calculate the profits of each company. Represent graphically. Managers now note that explicit agreements to collude are illegal. Each company must decide on its own whether to produce the amount of Cournot or that of the cartel.
Suppose that GE is trying to prevent Maytag from entering the market for high efficiency clothes dryers. Even though high efficiency dryers are more costly to produce, they are also more profitable as they command sufficiently higher prices from consumers. The following payoffs table shows the annual profits for GE and Maytag for the advertising spending and entry decisions that they are facing. GE MAYTAG Advertising = $12m Advertising = $0.7m Stay Out $0, $30m $0, $35m Enter $1m , $20m $12m, $15 Based on this information, can GE successfully prevent Maytag from entering this market by increasing its advertising levels? What is the equilibrium outcome in this game? Suppose that an analyst at GE is convinced that just a little bit more advertising by GE, say another $2m, would be sufficient to deter enough customers from buying Maytag, thus, yield less than $0 profits for Maytag in the event it enters. Suppose that spending an extra $2m on advertising…
Prove that in the variation on the centipede game given in figure 14.5(b) the unique sequential equilibrium described is, in fact, the unique Nash equilibrium. (Hint: Take some presumed Nash equilibrium and suppose information set 2n+ 1 [for player 2] is the first unreached information set. Derive an immediate contradiction. Then suppose that node (2n) t is the first unreached information set and derive a contradiction that is one degree removed from immediate.)