Defense of Abortion Essay

Philosophy 1001-001 A Defense of Abortion in Pregnancy Reduction In this paper I will discuss the relevance of J.J. Thomson’s argument in her article, A Defense of Abortion, to that of pregnancy reduction and if there is any relevance, if there are exceptions or situations where that might change. J.J. Thomson’s argument in A Defense of Abortion is that the one thing a person has rights to is his/her body and the right to control what happens with it. Thomson also states that there is an innate

November 24, 2014 Murder of an Innocent Abortion is the deliberate killing of the weakest and most defenseless among us. A pregnant woman has the right to decide whether her baby should live or die. But what about the unborn baby? Doesn’t it get a say? Doesn’t its life cost anything? According to the first amendment of the constitution, we have the freedom of speech. So why not give the speechless fetus a chance to come into the world? If the reason for an abortion is not having enough money or wanting

There is a debate concerning abortion. The issue is whether it is morally permissible or impermissible. Those who choose the latter position are known as pro-life. Their argument stems from the premise that a fetus is a human being – a person from the moment of conception. Philosopher Judith Jarvis Thomson opposes that statement. However, in her text, A Defense of Abortion, she assumes that the premise is true, in order to believe that abortion is morally impermissible. Although, the various fictitious

In the article, “A Defense of Abortion” by Thomson, the author states the two points that contradict the most the right of a fetus and the right of a mother. The authors main stance, is there are abortions that are morally permissible and impermissible under certain circumstances. Thomson, makes the assumption that a fetus is a person so she can prove abortion is permissible in some situations. The author states, under three cases abortion is permissible and she further elaborates on the premise

Thomson in her essay titled “A Defense of Abortion,” points out her view that abortion can be permissible when a woman is not in control of her own body. One of Thomson’s analogies that ambiguously connects with her general position of this case of abortion is the famous violinist analogy. This analogy consists on that you were kidnapped or just wake up plugged into the violinist and it needed your kidneys for nine months to live, and if you unplug yourself from the violinist, he will die. Thomson

In Thomson’s “A Defense of Abortion,” she states that the mother’s right to life can be greater than that of the fetus. I disagree with this premise because the fetus has a right to life, and it is the mother’s natural responsibility, or obligation, to take care of her child. This issue is very relevant in modern society and occurs on a daily basis, so I am inclined to view my objection (as well as Thomson’s argument) as important influences on others’ current positions. In this paper, I will argue

What takes precedence; an unborn fetus’ life or its mother’s right to her body? Anti-abortionist argue that the life of an unborn fetus has priority, and thus abortion is morally impermissible as it violates the fetus’ right to life. In her article “A Defense of Abortion”, Judith Thomson argues that abortion is morally permissible under the certain conditions where the rights of the fetus fail to surpass a mother’s right of choice. For the sake of her argument, Thomson allows the assumption that

In “A Defense of Abortion” by Judith Jarvis Thomson, her key implication is that if a fetus is a person with a right to life, then abortion would still be morally permissible in cases of rape or contraceptive failure. She mentions that all of the arguments she makes are implying the fetus being a person from the moment of conception. If the fetus is not a person from the moment of conception, but only a “fertilized ovum or a clump of cells,” then abortion is okay. First, she brings up the slippery

In class, we discussed arguments that we're made by ethicist about abortion. Out of the two, Thompson has the weakest argument. For an argument to be weak, the argument can be challenged by a counter argument. In A Defense of Abortion, Thompson uses an analogy about the violinist to get the reader to reframe their opinion on the subject on whether abortion is morally right or morally wrong solely based on rights. The story involves placing the reader as the protagonist of the story and the doctors

topic about abortion is so popular because of the people that are either pro-life or pro-choice. I am pro-choice because of certain reason by me being and Christian it look like I am being and “Hypocrite” but, I have things I believe and do not let my religion take full control on my personal thought when it comes to certain things in my life. The question was asked why Thomson assumes that a fetus is a person with a right to life in her argument. In the article, “A defense of Abortion”, by Judith