Footage

cameras because watching the body cam footage will reduce the dishonesty in accidents or incident reports.Another reason is because the footage can provide a more richer and accurate details on the incident. Finally with body cams it will encourage both citizens and officers to behave. First off body cams is a great idea in my opinion for officers to wear while on duty because it will prevent the officers and citizens from not telling the truth. If the footage shows the officer misbehaving the

respondents, do not want to be filmed, but this unwanted footage from body cameras could be used in public trials if necessary (Baum). On the other hand, rules could be put in place to protect privacy. Only footage useful for a case should be stored, and if the footage is necessary, it can only be used privately in cases. Another reason some are reluctant for officers to wear body cameras is because of body camera limitations. Video footage may not give the entire picture in certain situations, and

If a murder was committed late at night the only primary evidence would be CCTV footage or (Eye-Witness reports). The footage could give important information and the time of the murder and how the murder was committed. Having CCTV footage at different angles gives the investigator more understanding on what happen at the time. Why primary sources are necessary and the issues involving it? Primary sources are

one film showed the Jewish life in the Ghettos. This film turned into the documentary called A Film Unfinished. The footage from the film corresponds with the class lectures about the ghettos in regards to conditions, underground secretes, and the Judenrat. Conditions in the ghetto varied in different locations, but in this film, the footage comes from the Warsaw ghettos. The footage of the film corresponds with class lectures by showing the Warsaw ghetto conditions compared to hearing about them

Super-Size Me is a documentary that was created to influence the U.S about obesity. Morgan Spurlock the creator and director of this documentary decided to show the U.S what McDonalds can do to trigger obesity, he shows fake pathos using the persuasive and film devices that effects the sequence of the audio content and film arrangement. Tampering with the music in certain parts of the documentary, can give the audience a sense of distasteful emotion towards McDonalds. In the documentary there is

law enforcement officers have come under tremendous scrutiny by the public due to police officers’ use of excessive force. Several deadly force incidents captured on video and not captured caused the arrest or dismissal of police officers. Video footage of law enforcement in the performance of their jobs represents the most powerful visual evidence that can help exculpate or incriminate police officers and law-abiding citizens. The essence of accountability and responsibility followed by the consequences

Since these events, however, law enforcement body cameras have been the talk of the nation. With regards to the case concerning the death of Michael Brown, many individuals across the country sternly believe that if there had been actual footage of the shooting that day, Officer Wilson would have been indicted for his actions. With that said, since this specific incident, 30 out of 54 Ferguson police officers have actually began wearing body cameras (Ponsi). Some proponents argue that body cameras

co-written by Spurlock and mocks the lingo associated with fast food. Jump cuts help speed up interviews and uphold the documentary’s fast pace. At one point during the film we observe a funny and informative animated sequence about chicken nuggets. Footage of the famous icon Ronald McDonald caring for children underpins the way McDonald’s marketing targets children. Repeated shots of the McDonald’s arches appear making them seem permeating. Title cards using modern artwork interpretations of the McDonalds

Some people may say that body worn cameras are a violation of privacy because it records anyone the lens are facing. When police are wearing the cameras, the recordings will capture everyday civilians that aren’t necessary to be captured. Although it is true that it records everyone in the camera's sight, it allows police to have more witnesses if a crime or complaint has been made against them. These people contribute to more evidence in court that will ultimately make the verdict fairier. If their

This Critique will be going over five different aspects, I will be covering the roles adopted during the project by each group member, I will present an argument on one aspect of the project that I believe was strong, and I will be identifying aspects of my project that I think could have been strengthened and how these could have been changed to improve the work. I will also be providing a rationale for the final cut of the project and discuss how the peer review did or did not help in the development