Patriot Act Essay

America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act, also known as the USA PATRIOT Act, approved by the Bush Administration in 2001. The attacks on 9/11 and the PATRIOT Act, mutually, heavily increased the surveillance that the government engages in, by interpreting and enacting the Fourth Amendment Protection, the Wiretap Act (Title III), the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA),

Modern technology has given people many freedoms and the power to do many things. However just like the great words of Spiderman “…with great power comes great responsibility.” Along with these magnificent inventions came a greater and more efficient way for enemies of the country to destroy us. With the invention of planes came hijacking, with cars came unsuspecting car bombs, and with the internet came cyber-attacks. Governments all over the world continuously have to adjust to the new technology

The Electronic Communications Privacy Act (“ECPA”) was passed in 1986 to update the 1968 Title III Wiretap Act, the federal statute that first prohibited the actual or intentional interception communications without judicial authorization (Wiretap Act, 1968). The 1968 act only concerned wire and oral communications; a wire communication was defined as “any communication made in whole or in part through the use of [common carrier] facilities for the [interstate or foreign] transmission of communications

Since the introduction of the USA-Patriot Act after 9-11, and with the current and continuous looming threat of terrorism, America has been on the breach of whether the intelligence community is taking advantages and using these to dilute our civil liberties. The tension between civil liberties and Homeland Security is really complex, throw in immigration policy, criminal law, First Amendment and others and it is a recipe for disaster to Americans. We as Americans cherish our civil liberties and

I 've selected the article because for several reasons: it 's importance in the context of this class, and the First Amendment rights of the defendants. Second, my final paper topic was “Free Speech, First Amendment Rights and 'Terroristic ' Messages”. I 've used the article in my paper and presentation, as well I 've particularly valued the case of Tarek Mehanna, 2012 while giving the examples for the Free speech rights and its protection in case of use and distribution of ' Terroristic ' Messages

ruled that the NSA could still resume bulk data collection for at least five more months. The law allowed the NSA to keep collecting millions of metadata, records show that not only are phone calls being monitored but also who called whom, when and for how long. According to reports, Congress gave the government 180 days to make the transition, during which it could continue to collect the data, as it is almost the same time the FISA court allowed the NSA to keep collecting the data. But while

Domestic Surveillance Is Protection Terrorism, it’s a scary word. It might make people uneasy or maybe even a little frightened, but just because it’s there doesn’t mean that it isn’t possible to prevent the act. Acts as in 9/11, the Boston bombings, and the Paris attacks, those are more preventable and predictable with domestic surveillance. In an article about international security Keith Alexander, the director of the NSA, stated, “Information gathered from programs provided the government with

"After the tragedy of September 9, 2011 and the subsequent passing of the Patriot Act, Government surveillance has expanded in the age of technology in which we currently reside. Although the stated mission of this increase in surveillance of American citizens was to prevent major terrorist incidents such as 9/11 from happening again, many people refute this stated purpose as the truly invasive extent of this surveillance was revealed within the statements of Edward Snowden, a defector from the

was so careful hiding the true proceedings of his criminal activities that the police could only arrest him for tax evasion charges, now considered money laundering, too. It was not until the late 20th century that a formal term was imposed to this act. As time has passed and technology has improved so have money laundering techniques, but the United States law enforcement is battling money laundering

country’s enemies still posed an enormous threat to the nation’s security. In response to the events that took place on 9/11, the United States Congress passed the USA/Patriot Act, which intensified the surveillance powers held by the federal government through the National Security Agency (NSA) and other federal agencies. This act increased national airport security procedures, metro security in most major U.S. cities, and extended the government’s capacity to spy on citizens. There are many surveillance