Stroop Effect Essay

an understanding of the brain and its adaptive processes under interference. The effect of interference on cognitive processes has been studied to find a correlation between automatic and controlled processes. A study by Klein (1964), on how word meaning influences color naming has been attacked from a host of different angles (MacLeod 1991). His goal was to understand the sources of the word's interfering effect in color naming and the processes involved in that interference (MacLeod 1991). The

The experiment tests whether conflict takes place between the automatic process of reading a word and the controlled process of naming the ink colour of the word by replicating a version of the Stroop effect. A sample of 20 volunteering participants, 10 men and 10 women, aged 18-69, took part in the experiment. Participants were given two conditions, one list with colour-related distractor words and one list with colour-neutral words. For each participant, time necessary to name the ink colour of

The Stroop Effect is an experiment that John Ridley Stroop, discovered in the 1930s. He was born in Murfreesboro, Tennessee, March 21, 1897 and completed his training at Peabody College where he received his Ph.D. degree. Although several other researchers studied it, it was named after Stroop, and he also published a paper on it in 1935. The Stroop Effect is a demonstration of how the interference of conflicting information between the brain and the eyes can slow down the reaction time in some

1980) proposes that people use concrete experiences to represent abstract concepts through metaphorical mappings. Santiago and his colleagues (2012) reviewed the literatures on CMT, and summarized task effect called "conceptual congruency". Conceptual congruency effect (CCE) indicates the task effect that while people do judgment on an abstract conceptual dimension, their performance can be influenced by the manipulation on a concrete conceptual dimension. In daily life language, color-emotion is a

Exploring the Stroop Effect by using numbers Abstract The purpose of this experiment is to study automatic processes by replicating the previously carried out Stroop effect by using numbers. This experiment was conducted by recruiting 8 participants (4 males and 4 females), who are working in a head-office of Save the Children Organization in Yangon, selected by an opportunistic sample. Participants were presented with a Stroop-experiment-task sheet which consists of two parts which was the congruent

done by Stroop (1935), where he coined the term “Stroop Effect”, which referred to an automatic process interfering with the ability to complete another task. In his experiment, participants were instructed to say the text color of a written color name. For

more about the different types of cognitive assessment methods, such as “Attention; Stroop Effect, Perception; Muller-Lyer Illusion, Short-term memory: Remember 11 words/numbers/ pictures and Long-term memory: Encoding Specificity. Introduction At the point when people center, see something or even attempt to recall or review things, response timing and precision is constantly distinctive. Stroop effect tests allow individual to oversee colors on an entire new other level. Muller-Lyer

Fissell, Carter, & Cohen, 1999). However, Mayr et. al (2003) argued that the congruency sequence effect found by Gratton et al. (1992) was due to repetition priming because of stimulus repeats in a flanker task. This may have led to a faster reaction time with repeated trials. Mayr et al. (2003) used two experiments to present evidence for their argument. Both experiments failed to show the effect found by Gratton et al. (1992) when target and stimulus items did not repeat from trial to trial.

The aim of this experiment was to test how the automatic processing of reading interferes with the controlled processing of naming a colour. The findings support the original previous research (Stroop, 1935) as a significant difference was found which indicates that when the controlled process of naming a colour is not interfered with then it can be recognized faster whereas when the automatic processes of reading words is involved then the time taken to name the colour is slower due to the interference

monolingual counterparts for executive function. Fortunately, Gregory and Van Hell performed a Simon task Experiment with monolinguals, bilinguals, and trilinguals. Gregory and Van Hell are able to compare across all three groups and conclude, for the Simon effect, that monolinguals did the worst. Essentially, bilinguals did better than monolinguals, and trilinguals did better than bilinguals, although, only by a limited amount. Trilinguals did the best because they regularly practice their language control