Theodicy

unjust? (Lewis 31) The point is to say that we must be comparing our perception of God to a supreme standard of good, and where else does this come from, but God. Thus the objection itself assumes that God must exist. So then what is the point of a theodicy? If we are not defending God’s existence, what are we seeking to do? What objection are we defending God

The problem of evil is widely considered as the most detrimental problem to the monotheist. It is also the primary objection to the overall existence of God. The problem is very easy to comprehend: If God is an all-perfect, all-knowing, all-powerful deity then why do we live in a world with any imperfection or negativity at all? Why do bad things happen at all? Especially to the good people in the world and the millions of innocent people who suffer on a daily basis. Gottfreid Leibniz was a philosopher

in this world. Finally, premise four acknowledges that there is evil and suffering in this world, so we are forced to concluded that there is no God. However, the theist has two responses to the logical problem of evil, first the theodicy and also a defence. The theodicy is championed by CS Lewis and gives the reason God exist in the world with evil. God permits it. When God made humanity, he wanted us to love him back and make moral decisions on our own. For humanity to do this, it is required us

This paper will look at the concept of evil as it impacts our world. Despite the horrible effects of evil in our world, there is a way to lessen the impact on the lives of individuals. For many centuries Christians have struggled with both the existence and the nature of evil. Most people would acknowledge that evil is real and has always had devastating effects on our world. From the sexual abuse of children, to the horrific terrorist attacks on 9/11, evil continues to rear its ugly head in

challenges and adversities as they go through life. Therefore, it is inappropriate and insensitive to attempt to justify the hardships of others using argumenative measures. Conversely, one should respond to these concerns using positive apologetics or theodicy. This is the justification of the ways of God to men. Rather than pursuing to aggressively defend concepts like the theistic set, the response should simply present reasons for why they trust in God in the midst of evil. As discussed

Searching for the origins of evil is one of history’s most difficult problems. While there are varying answers and approaches to the answer, we know that evil does not exist as a singular substance within the universe, therefore making determining the origins of evil more complicated and contentious. Throughout history, many ideas and narratives have been told that attempt to justify the existence of evil within the world. Stories range from evil being released through Pandora’s box to it existing

Notes • The problem of evil (the problem of suffering) is an argument against the existence of God • The argument against the existence of God is incompatible with the existence of an all-loving, all-powerful God. Greek Philosopher Epicurus The Epicurean Paradox • Is God willing, but not able to prevent evil? • Answer: Then he is not omnipotent • Is God able but not willing? • Then he is malevolent • Is he both able and willing? • Then whence cometh evil? • Is he neither able nor willing

In the documentary “Faith and Doubt at Ground Zero,” a number of people were interviewed about how their religious beliefs or non beliefs, were challenged since the events of September 11th. The interviews with priests, rabbis, family members of victims, survivors, lay people, atheists and agnostics, this documentary explores how Americans’ spiritual lives may have changed since the event. When a tragic event happens, people would either grow closer to god or outgrow god. To those people who do

While some believe that free-will causes suffering, other believe that evil helps us figure out our role in the world and allows us to find peace within ourselves. The Core 9 readings have presented several theodicies explaining what other religions think of suffering and evil. These theodicies help contribute to my understanding and my view of evil and suffering. I have concluded that God does not intend to do evil things to us. But rather the reason for suffering is caused by

The reason for the existence of evil is a topic that as been a debauchle among philosophers for a long time. In this paper I am going to examine four major perspectives: the Judaic/Christian family, Augustine’s free will theory, “soul-making theodicy,” and eschatological perspective. All of these theories have valid points and flaws in their writing. I hope to compare and contrast them, so that I can better undertand. First, there is the perspective of Judaism and Christianity. The cause of evil