Unjust Laws Essay

Mesopotamia. He was given laws from shamash to put to order on the land he was ruling. The question I am going to answer is, Was hammurabi’s code just or unjust? The question is saying were the laws fair or not. I think the laws are unfair, so I will discuss how they are unfair. I will discuss in the other paragraphs my proven point about how they were unfair on some of the laws. Hammurabi’s code can be seen fair and unfair and it has many laws that are about family. The law 199 (doc E) says if he

the country. Within the letter, King addresses the concern of just and unjust laws, and why one should be followed and one shouldn’t (King). The mode of thinking of laws as unjust and just laws pose a moral question for those who it affects, and those who are placing the laws into effect; these moral questions have become important within the current Political climate and how to determine between an unjust law and a just law. In this response, I will explain how King differentiates the two and I

Breaking the law is ethically reasonable when the law is unfair and damages human rights. Laws are set up for us to obey, yet citizens have the capacity to separate the right from the wrong. Violating the law can be legitimized in certain circumstances and for the correct reasons. For example, Neo, Edward Snowden, and Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. were put into different situations where they broke the law for something they believed was morally unjust. In what circumstances is it admissible to break

with civil disobedience Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society. It has a positive impact to a free society because most people would generally oppose taking the consequences for an unjust law, calling it absurd. By demonstrating to a society that you can make a difference by remaining peaceful to remove an unjust law, you will likely gain followers. This is good because one individual isn?t enough to change a law by protesting. Instead, a group or community can eventually

obey even unjust laws? Think about what this means. This means that laws, regardless of how unfair, unjust, or immoral they may be, must be followed with no better reason that they are the law. To the thesis that we are obliged to obey even unjust laws, I will argue that the standard objections to Civil Disobedience, given by Singer, are incorrect               To begin, however, I believe it is necessary to define an "unjust" law. According to St. Thomas Aquinas, "Any law that uplifts

a civilized society, government ratifies laws and endorses them while its citizens acknowledge them and follow them; even if the laws may be despotic. The love of one’s country should be a sign that they are one-hundred percent loyal to the cause, even if there may be bouts of moral violations. Patriotism has no grey areas in its ideologies. Socrates says that You must either persuade [unjust law] or obey its orders, and endure in silence whatever [the law] instructs you to endure, and if it leads

harsh punishments and that the people had no say in laws. Hammurabi was the king of the city-state Babylon in Mesopotamia. He ruled for a while and he had a code. It was called Hammurabi's code. The code was filled with just and unjust laws that will be described in this essay. The harsh punishments and that the people had no say in laws. The following are the reasons why Hammurabi's code was unjust. The first reason why Hammurabi's code was unjust is that of the harsh punishments. To begin the first

caliber and follow the truth rather than following the majority. MLK on the other hand elaborates the topic of just and unjust law and how it is related to the unjust law. Their approaches were not similar but their intentions were same. Now the main question is ‘Is there any way we can response to those various instances of social injustice? What are unjust law and application of unjust law and how should we

Crito: What is Just and Unjust? In Plato’s dialogue, Crito, the question is posed whether or not it is just or unjust for Socrates to leave the prison in which he is currently being held. Socrates stood trial under the charges of, essentially, corrupting the youth of Athens with his ideas and impiety against the gods that Athens recognizes. It is through these charges that Socrates is sentences to death upon the arrival of a state galley’s ship from Delos. At the start of Crito, Socrates’s friend

the other hand, King does not deem rational argument as the expert on law; rather he sees it stemming from God as he notes that “a just law is a code that squares with the moral law or the law of God” (King 408). Although Socrates was wrongly imprisoned and waiting the death penalty, which he acknowledges, he, according to his argument, is not permitted to act unjustly in return, or break the law. Pertaining to justice, the laws to Socrates are the most important and in order to keep the city functioning