3.2 Adding a Social Leader to Alleviate Team Conflict
As has been observed in Part A, the software team are limited by their lack in numbers and hence are not able to fill each of Barry’s four key roles that are required for a self-managed team succeed. Furthermore, as noted in Part A, the software team experiences a lot of conflict.
According to Barry (1991), a social leader is able to focus mainly on building and upholding the group from a social and psychological point of view. This includes: raising different group members’ desires and concerns and in doing so actively make sure that each member is heard, being understanding to the groups emotional levels, and are able to create an environment where conflicts are mediated by
…show more content…
Therefore it will be expected that by adding a social leader to the software team that conflict will be managed in an effective and efficient manner. Finally, it has been shown that teams designed with the framework set out by Barry (1991) will be more likely to develop trust between members (Lovelace, Shapiro & Weingart, 2001). This is crucial as trust is critical to team success, especially in situations (alike to that of the software team) where time constraints are an impediment (Lovelace et al., 2001).
Critiques & Limitations While the aforesaid recommendation is likely to improve the software team’s cohesion, reduce conflict and set them in a forward moving direction, it is important to be conscious of the limitations of the suggestion. It is possible that due to the circumstances present – being on an imminent deadline and a short timeframe to implement a solution – that a suitable, experienced and willing social leader will be available to transition into the group. Furthermore, even if such an inclusion was possible, it is foreseeable that – in certain situations – teams will not have the ability to work together, regardless of how the team dynamic is changed. This could be due to a hypothetically irreconcilable difference in opinion between group members that no amount of mediation will solve. Finally, if a suitable social leader were to become available, the potential cost for his/her food and accommodation at any further team interactions may be
Conflict arises from various sources in the team setting (Capozzoli, 1995). The most common causes of conflict are values, attitudes, needs, expectations, perceptions, resources, and personalities. As we are all raised with different values, morals come into play when the team issue deals directly or indirectly with ones values, morals, or ethics. Conflicting attitudes can bring about problems as two or more team members prove to have differing goals in mind. Individual needs can cause rifts within a team when they are not satisfied. The expectations of team members are not the same on how the goal will be met. We all have different perceptions of life situation and interpret them differently. The lack of resources needed to complete a task can cause conflict. Differing personalities play a major role in team conflict.
Conflict Levels – Effective teams maintain a perfect level of negative and positive conflicts. At times disagreement is encouraged to lessen the likelihood of groupthink.
When we think of leadership, what comes to mind? Is it the bold, charismatic, and passionate person who takes the group on their back? Or is it really the more quiet and realistic leader who has a compromising attitude? Most people will think of a loud and passionate person who can grab the attention of an audience. But leaders come in all shapes and sizes. Leadership is defined by dictionary.com as the ability to guide or influence others to achieve a common goal. Although the term leader is used in our everyday lives, many people mistake it for close synonyms. Not all leaders have to be the boisterous, bold, and burly people that most people think of them to be. More often than not, a leader will be the commanding one in the group. But there
Humans are physically, mentally and emotionally unique, however, each of us shares a core set of needs, which guide and motivate one’s decisions and actions. One of the human needs that one desires to fulfill is interpersonal and involves feeling of belongingness. It is critical that all human feel a sense of belonging and acceptance among others, regardless of the social groups or settings. Therefore, the most efficient way one can fulfill this need is to understand the concepts of a team. Teams have become more increasingly prominent in the workforce because it has countless benefits for both individual and the organization as a whole. A team rather than individualized work derive better quality, understand the strengths and weakness of each team member, it increases productivity and creates an opportunity for synergistic combinations of idea and abilities. Due to individuals distinctive personality traits the development of a cohesive team can be challenging, however through influential communication processes, effective leadership approaches, and conflict management a team can be use to help achieve greater success.
What Leadership Means Leadership is 'the behaviour of an individual when he is directing the activities of a group towards a shared goal'. (Hemphill and Coons, 1957, p.7) A leader is interpreted as someone who sets direction in an effort and influences people to follow that direction. How they set that direction and influence people depends on a variety of factors.
In this paper I will discuss how a team leader assesses how big the team is needed in order to accomplish the task assigned to them. This paper will also discuss the how conflicts can arise while trying to meet their goals. Such as which person works better in certain areas. I will also talk about how a team leader resolves their problems that may accure. In addition I will also discuss if team work will take longer to complete task along with some of its advantages. I will also point out some of the resistors to team work like not have the proper tools or supplies. I will also discuss how to be proactive so
1. What is the one topic that really stood out to you in Chapter 9- Collaborating in Teams? Why? Chapter nine in our textbook addressed collaborating in teams. This chapter did an excellent job of informing the reader about several key elements pertaining to teamwork. Topics like elements of teamwork, team dynamics and how to improve them, and ways to enhance teamwork. After completing the homework for this week in conjunction with our required reading assignments one aspect of our reading really stood out to me. Learning about the differences between groups and teams in the workplace was very interesting to me. As learned, there are several fundamental differences between groups and teams. Some of the components of a group are: roles
The members in this type of team collaborate to share in management and decision-making roles, while maintaining accountability for organizational responsibilities under their direction. Although, this team method system may not be suited for all companies, in order for self-directed to be successful, managers and supervisors will need to become facilitators or coaches. Proper planning and communication plays a vital role in this transition, as is examined in the case study presented.
When you’re a leader you are faced with having to manage a large task, which means you are driven to be open to know how to solve problems as they arise. As part of the group-- most importantly, the leader of the group-- you must be able to listen to concerns and communicate well with others. One example of a leadership role that I have performed was with our school’s Outdoors Club. Our group had volunteered to represent the school at the Crestwood Elementary School Nature Fair. We had one booth at the fair that was exceptionally popular amongst the kids. Consequently, the space was limited so we were unable efficiently use all of
It is observed that Team managers within the Software Solutions team decide and then sell the decision to the team members while the team managers within the Technology Solutions team allow more the team to identify the problem, develop the options, and decide on the action within the manager’s received limits.
The discoveries lead researches to believe that this study can help create more content teams and probably a more effective workforce within organizations. This sociometric study also revealed why the team of squads work together but did not revealed why some teams perform better than others.
The leader is a group role that is associated with a high-status position and may be formally or informally recognized by group members. Leadership is a complex of beliefs, communication patterns, and behaviors that influence the functioning of a group and move a group toward the completion of its task.
A team comprises of three or more people who come from different units or departments within the company with varying skills, knowledge and experience but they regularly collaborate in order to achieve a set target, objective or project. It is also known that ‘Teams’ are often formed for temporary assignments with one main goal, focus or outcome in mind. So, it can be said that teams should be able to avoid potential problems at the early stages of the project. An example of this is, if a team is
From school projects, to clubs, to businesses on the IPO, teams and teamwork were essential to their growth, development and success. However, there are reasons as to why some teams work, and why others don’t. Reasons as to why some work and some don’t can be attributed to many factors. These factors may include communication issues, loyalty, trust, and lack of compliance within the team. Even though individuals are from the same or similar communities, communication is commonly declared as the root of all team issues. Other issues are also attributed to different personalities. People tend to work better with individuals that they can relate to and work similarly. The setting and context at which individuals work also influence team synergy. Everyone can relate to a situation where people are put into groups, or teams, and work was not done. The mentality people must have is one where they consider who they want or need on their team in order to achieve success, rather than who they like hoping to achieve success. What tends to happen is that people would rather work with individuals they like because of previous experiences. However, the context of the project may be unrelated to previous ones and personal matters can come into play. Eventually a
A theory of team working that details the stages of team development that are typical to any type of team