3M Optical Systems: Case Brief
As Andy Wong, how would you handle the authorization for expenditure for the re-launch of the privacy screen? As Andy Wong, I would take the proposal to one of my senior-level mentors for support. The OS unit has already tried and failed three times with the microlouvered filter and high level support would benefit both Wong and Guehler in this case. If Guehler sees that other areas of 3M are in support of the authorization for expenditure, then he will not have to be concerned about the OS unit’s credibility – this gives Wong a significant plus. If, however, Wong is unable to garner the support from his mentors in order to give this AFE the standing it needs, I would not recommend backing the
…show more content…
The only dependable thing about OS at the time that Wong is requesting an expenditure of $750k, is that it is, “A group unable to fulfill its promises.” (Bartlett & Mohammad, 1994)
How effective has Wong been as a front line manager in the 3M context? How effective has Guehler been as a 3M division president? Wong has not been very effective as a front line manager. One of his primary roles should be product championing. He must garner support throughout the organization, particularly at different levels of management, in order for his unit to have the buy-in required for continued support. Despite his utilization of bootlegging and scavenging efforts, at least in the third and final version of their privacy screen, he has not been able to reassure middle-management, namely Guehler. It was Wong’s responsibility to provide Guehler with a basis for claiming support for the OS projects. Clearly, such support has not been acquired. Further, it is required of Wong, who acts as the venture manager, to participate in strategic forcing, “Attaining a significant sales volume and market share position within a limited time horizon.” (Burgelman, 1986) It could easily be said that the limited time frame OS had expired with the second attempt.
Guehler has not been very effective as a 3M division president. He has
Evaluating his approach to bringing about change in his organization. Comparing his approach with that of Jack Welch.
The industry is in the sinking market as sales are declining for the last two years. Gilcrist must avoid re-establishing the company in a sinking market, but to make innovation and change. She should invest her marketing budget into the power boat segment of the industry and expand the company or even move the company to a different location. The challenge for Gilcrist will be to stimulate employee creativity and tolerance for change due to her new directorship as president.
What is your evaluation of MGI’s team processes? What were the root causes of the team’s process problems?
As a new company he and his partner did very well within the first 18 months, working constantly and diligently. By the time 18 months went by, he and his partner had made over a few hundred thousand dollars (Leaders of Info 2). They made this money by selling their software to big companies such as Apple and Commodore as well as many little companies (Leaders of Info 2). A very
2. If you were Leary, how would you respond to Chung's request for a private office?
In This case we see the typical problem which affect big Companies : the conflict between old style and new school of thought. We analyze Zara’s information Technology strategies and the diatribe between Salgado, The Head of the Department and Sanchez , his assistant,s concern upgrading the operating system and the implementation of a new IT system to fulfill the needs of a fast growing retail chain. Despite the fact that Zara is over performing in their core business and that they are not showing big problems inside their structure, this shouldn’t be seen as a pretense to dodge updating the Software. Here we
Hewlett Packard (HP) decided to produce 1.3-inch disk drives to become the market leader in a new market and increase HP’s revenue. Although the market for 1.3-inch disk drives was still unclear and still developing, HP decided to organize a special team to develop this new product. This group was multi-talented, with the best engineers from every department in the company. The group also had many priorities for the company. However, things didn’t develop as the Kittyhawk team expected. They failed to sell the new product to the customer they planned. Even though some new customers were interested in this
Accordingly, “major new-product development activity was replaced by incremental product line extensions” (p.56) that resulted in a major revenue stall. The premature core abandonment cause is illustrated with the Kmart example. While the company was investing in a range of unrelated businesses searching for growth, Wal-Mart developed effective distribution and inventory systems. Kmart’s management failed to monitor and match these systems and fell far behind its rival. Hitachi’s example illustrates the talent bench shortfall. One of the leading causes of the stall was the company had executive management that lacked capabilities.
National Computer Operations (NCO) was an internal, monopolizing computer support entity that was faced with a challenge which was presented by the new banks chainman. The change, which was to take effect in 2 years, was that NCO could now market externally and all the internal departments could buy computer services from outside firms (Spector, 2013, p. 73). How was the company leader, Gar Finnvold, going to overcome these changes? The following essay will discuss a step by step diagnosis for the organization, as well as, who and what tools will be utilized. Additionally, the essay will describe who and what tools will be utilized.
The company based its success on 3 pillars of Strategy in the field of Quality, Synergy and Internationalization upon the New Management under the leadership of Lee Kun-Hee. The new management was focused on achieving Quality over Quantity, Low cost Products to Differentiation and Cheap Wages to pioneers in Technology and Branding . The key areas where the company focused were:
The two different ways we used to reach an estimated price for LBOs since it is a critical
In this paper, the author will introduce a failure case of K-Mart 's IT modernization system project. In 2001, K-mart took $1.4 billion dollars into this project with the purpose of competing with its rival Walmart. The dream is beautiful, but the real work is cruel. After 18 months, the project was failed because of lacking of cash. What happened in the detailed for this project? $1.4 billion dollar is huge numbers, why it was still not enough to pay and distribute for this project? How did its project manager do in this project? What are the project problems? How can we learn from the failure of this case? The paper includes the case background introduction, the project development process, the problems in the project, analysis and
AtekPC is a mid-sized U.S PC maker with sales of $ 1.9 billion and employed 2100 full time employees and additional 200 part time workers. This case discusses most of the obstacles to establishing a PMO (Project management Office) are beyond the CIO and PMO Manager's control. We see a lot of problems faced by the CIO in implementing a PMO in the enterprise. Regardless of the technical challenges during the implementation, the core of the problems seems to be that the PMO is lacking organization support, from the top to the bottom. There is not enough executive stakeholder support, there is no visibility of the program, there is a conflict of interests within departments
(Cedar Tech) an importer and distributor of computer accessories in Los Angeles, California. After three years, Cedar Tech became a provider of third party technology, software, hardware and services at the corporate level. Customers were offered new products like printers, computers, displays, peripherals, printer consumables and software and, computer and networking accessories. In 2000, Cedar Tech acquired a small solution provider called Denta Solutions, which specialized in IT storage (Ghazzawi).
The infrastructure of Boldflash’s Mobile Division is full of flaws. There’s no communication between departments, each team is stepping on the other teams’ toes, and there is no coordination in the product development process. Discussion Question 1 begs the question of how the conflicting performance metrics of each group contributes to the problem, as well as how the current process fosters coordination issues among the departments. Sales measures its performance strictly based on revenues, while Product Development is based on how many patents it’s holding as well as how many academic papers were published in journals. Additionally, Manufacturing’s performance was evaluated based on how many products it produces, and Marketing’s metric