“Derek’s Shawarma” Feb. 25th 2011 ADM 1300M In partial fulfillment of the requirements of ADM 1300 Executive summery To: From: Date: February 25th, 2011 Subject: Derek’s Shawarma Problem: Derek and Sal needed to decide how to structure the ownership of their business. Alternatives: * Maintain the status quo * Choose the general partnership * Choose the limited partnership * Choose the public corporation * Choose the private corporation Facts considered: * Derek graduated from the Telfer School of Management at the University of Ottawa 13 years ago, and his specialization in management. * Derek started his career in a middle management position at a firm in Ottawa; but Derek didn’t satisfy …show more content…
pros | cons | It has no expense. Derek will keep his current income. | Derek will not feel satisfied with his success in the corporate world. | There is no risk as well as uncertainty. They have the normal life as before. | The potential promotions were not enough to keep him inspired. | Derek can get a stable income to keep his life moving on. | They cannot make a lot of money if they don’t run this business. | Sal have a peaceful retirement, he doesn’t need to worry about his work. | | Although this is a no cost option in the short term, it will cost a lot in the long term. Derek will feel worse in his day-to-day work. Sal cannot keep busy during his retirement. Status quo will not solve the primary problem. Depending on compare pros with cons in the table, it’s better for them to run this business. Showing their talents in business will be an unforgettable experience in their lives. So, this alternative cannot solve the problem. No.2: The general partnership The general partnership means both Derek and Sal are actively involved in managing the firm and have unlimited liability. Sal not only financial supports the shawarma restaurant, but also participates actively in the business. This can decrease Derek’s pressure in management. Sal can know what is happening in his restaurant, can keep busy in his retirement, and he can make decisions in this business. pros | cons | Both of them can do their best to manage this business, they have
The benefits of Partnership Company are that business is anything but difficult to build up and start-up expenses are low. There is more capital accessible for the business. Workers that are of high-bore are made accomplices. The burdens are that the obligation of the accomplices for the obligations of the business is boundless . There is additionally danger of differences and contact among accomplices and administration. Every accomplice is an agent of the partnership and is at risk for activities by different accomplices. This means that it brothers choose this type, they will be responsible for each other’s action irrespective of the fact whether they like it or
Evaluating his approach to bringing about change in his organization. Comparing his approach with that of Jack Welch.
Jack Early was recently hired to be one of the higher-level managers. Jack had completed his M.B.A at one of the more well-known universities, and applied his knowledge and training, that he gained in school, to his work at Rockmont. He made such a good impression in a relatively short period of time, that he received many commendations and an early salary adjustment.
Many believe that liability is a biggest issue in a general partnership than in a sole proprietorship. The owners of the company are still fully liable for any debts the company may accrue as well as the liability for any lawsuits that may be brought against the company. However, the bigger issue in a partnership is that now each partner can be liable for the other partner’s actions. If one partner is sued for malpractice, the other partner may suffer because of it.
When it comes to partnerships Alex, Bill, Carl, and Devon will have two options- a general partnership or a limited partnership. Partnerships are beginning to be a business form of the past. Once upon a time, partnerships were “the default form of business and provided the benefit of pass-through taxation, but lacked the important feature of limited liability” (Chrisman, 2010, p. 465). In a general partnership, each partner associated with the entity will be held liable for their own business decisions as well as
have developed the best, most effective classroom management plan we can think of, there will always
partnership to continue, in the event a partner withdraws from the group. Similar to sole proprietorship, general partnerships tend to have a difficult time rounding up funding and resources, since most of the necessary capital comes from each partner's personal assets. This in turn may hinder longevity and growth of the organization. 4. Control In a typical general partnership, all partners will have equal rights and control over the business. It allows any partner to act on behalf of the business to make decisions and negotiation with
be at risk in the imminent future. That being said, although the people with contaminated
Adefemi started the meeting and presented the potential topics for the Preliminary Finding Report # 4 (Prelim # 4). Adefemi said that Prelim # 4 will discuss topics related Facility cost which includes additional rent for central park instructional site. Other topics will include allocation of reported expenses to program 9164, 83 Maiden Lane depreciation and physician expenses reported on the CFR.
The client (Sam) plans to organize a company “Newco” and have significantly more shares than the other two shareholders (Jason and Lucy). He will be one of the three directors of the corporations. Other two minority shareholders control the board of directors will also be officers.
CONVENIENCE or BURDEN – General partnerships are easy to establish and dissolve. All partners share gains, losses, and all liabilities.
Part V: Discuss how income and distributions may/will be allocated to Penelope, Mark and John. Profits are shared equally or by percentage ownership if that is how you divide the company ownership.
Chris and Sue are 50 percent shareholders in BackBone personal service corporation. Backbone provides chiropractic services in four separate offices, in four small towns: Troy, Union, Vista and Willow. Chris is the main chiropractor in the Troy office, and Sue heads up the Vista office. Charlie, the main chiropractor in the Willow office, does not see eye-to-eye with Chris and Sue on management styles. Charlie is highly competent and well-liked by patients and therefore indispensable in the eyes of Chris and Sue. Chris and Sue may be willing to give Charlie control of the Willow office, but do not want to lose the profits this office adds to BackBone. A corporate reorganization seems to be a good alternative.
Met with PO for 30 minutes individule session. The session was focused on reviewing treatment progress and discuss continuing care plan.
As a corporation, the McGees may be able to find new sources of funds for business development. Many people, including shareholders, could invest in the corporation. Finally, the corporation is the most reliable and trusted form of business entity. A possible downside to incorporation, the McGees may have to put up some of their private assets as a guarantee for the repayment of funds to financial institutions, if they are not found eligible for payment of money. Incorporation is not a small ordeal; it involves many legal formalities, laws, agreement documents, etc. It is necessary to prepare and revue all these documents carefully. Additionally, setting up the corporation will be an expensive task. There are good and bad aspects to a corporation in reference to taxes. With a corporation, the McGees will be taxable for self income, as well as for the corporation's revenue. However they will enjoy personal tax credits as with the sole proprietorship.