Advantages And Disadvantages Of Autocratic Government

The Constitutional Republic by definition is “a state wherever the officers square measure elective as representatives of the folks, and should govern in line with existing constitutional law that limits the government’s power over citizens”.

Each type of government holds different views as to the role the leaders and citizens should perform in their country .Different types of government include, oligarchy where the government is run by the best leaders, Tyranny, where they believe those in power should have complete control over its people. In the United States of America, we believe in democracy, rule by the majority. The main problem with our type of government is maintaining it. Our government and its citizens have lost sight of their roles and responsibilities, in government.

Who would think Oligarchy has so many advantages and benefits? As an oligarch, I would like to introduce the pros of Oligarchy to the citizens. The structure of Oligarchy makes the decision- making process fast and easy. Parliament and the constitution are absent in oligarchy. The decisions in oligarchy are made rapidly. The agreements get accepted quickly because it’s made by a handful number of people. Oligarchs are knowledgeable and intelligent individual and everyone is capable of making a wise decision. In Oligarchy, women get the opportunity to advance to the higher position in power. People don’t have to be wealthy to advance to a better position; they only have to have knowledge and creativity. A competent person, who serves

In the 19th century American’s were overjoyed when they gain their independence from Great Britain in 1776 and soon established a government under The Articles of Confederation. However, The Articles of Confederation were unstable and provided America with a weak central government, because of the lack authority needed to sustain a nation. Yet, many Americans opposed the idea of having a strong central government, because they feared America would shift into a dictatorship. While others felt that a strong government would sufficiently help the nation run as one. “The constitution of 1787 created a “federal’ system of dispersed and divided authority- authority divided between national and state governments, authority divided among executive,

In November of 2001, the United States was still reeling from the attacks on September 11 of that same year. President George W. Bush created a new organization to prevent future attacks on American flyers. The organization was called the Transportation Security Administration, or TSA. The TSA was tasked with implementing security measures to protect travelers. At first, the measures were welcomed by the public. They were seen as a necessary measure to protect against future 9/11 style attacks. But now, 15 years later, the measures the TSA have put in place have been questioned repeatedly by members of the public, the press and congress. Incidents such as the Underwear Bomber, where a Nigerian

America’s democracy is an important part of our history and what has made this country what it is today. There are many pros and cons in relation to how our country is run when it concerns the U.S. Constitution. Something that is important is that America is how the framers came up with the idea of what democracy is to help this nation to succeed and to help provide a good model to be followed throughout the world. There are different parts of our government which has powers yet they must consult with the other powers before following through and executing their proposals. Another factor that has played an important role in the development of our American democracy is where there is a big separation of government and religion. Our American democracy has our U.S. Constitution which relies on the three branches of government where the political parties have candidates which are voted into office. This paper will discuss how federalism is incorporated into our Constitution and what the purpose is in having three branches of government, the reason behind having the political parties and how this is incorporated into our American Democracy.

The majoritarian model is currently being used in Canadas political economy, however, Canada’s would be better off with a shift to the consensus model as it included all minority groups and represented the true meaning of democracy. The consensus model represented the people in a society by including minority groups, using a federal or decentralized government and a multi-party system. The consensus model ensured the inclusion of groups in plural societies, where this was absent under a majoritarian ruling. A majoritarian model of government only made decisions in the hands of a select few, whereas, in a consensus model the power was divided in a federal or decentralized government. Finally, a consensus model allowed for multiple parties to run for election under the multiparty system and voting was done under proportional representation. However, in a majoritarian government, there are two parties running for office which operated under a disproportional election.

The Unitary Executive theory postulates that the president controls the entire Executive branch in the United States. Some of the pros of the Unitary Executive Theory are that the president may make quick decisions in times of emergency for the nation’s welfare. In a national emergency, obviously, time is of the essence. The president may use his will and flexibility to act in an immediate manner based on intuition and best interests in mind. With hundreds of people in Congress and the rest of the nation to wait for Congressional decisions, it may be too late to plan and react in a dire situation.

There are also some pros to having a direct democracy, when the people want to see change, they appeal and they vote. Which would truly be a government “for the people, by the people”, protecting our interests. There is a “checks-and-balances” system that makes sure the power gets distributed. Democracy also promotes equality, allows for change, doesn't put too much power in the hands

Although they may not directly interact with them, democratic governing usually creates a better relationship between the government and people. Democracy has been around for hundreds of years. It started with philosophers such as Aristotle, Plato, Rousseau, Locke, Machiavelli, and Hobbes. These philosophers all have thoughts about democracy and democratic governing, including what makes democracy better, "It is clear then that the best partnership in a state is the one which operates through the middle people, and also that those states in which the middle element is large, and strong… have every chance of having a well-run constitution… When one set of people possess a great deal and the other nothing, the result is either extreme democracy

A just government is fair, balanced and gives back to the citizens of the nation that give consent to be governed. The founders of the United States intended for all citizens to experience a just government through the Constitution. The Constitution established a balanced state and federal government, taxes that created federal revenue and three branches of government.

Democracy is a type of government where the population of the State votes for the policies. Democratic Government can be a pure Democracy, Republic or any mix of those two. Typically in a Democracy the policies favor the public, like tax proportional to your income. Policies like that often give incentive for innovations and trade, which, leads to growth of the State. Focus on Economics when investigating is crucial. Take North Korea for example, they have a absolute monarchy. Due to that and the hostility from the North Korean Government, there is little to no trade with that State. From what we know about North Korea, they are far less medically advanced. Their literacy rate is also lower than similar States like South Korea. With no solid

Democracies have no say in what jobs citizens have, and do not force them to work for the government. In a democracy there can even be laws to get workers better treatment. A democracy is based on freedom, so using fear to control citizens will never happen. Scare tactics may work at first for communists, but the people always revolt. Democratic governments will not use the country's economy to fund their own interests, but to fund all aspects of the country. Democracies are run by a large group of politicians who are elected by the people. No one politician holds too much power stopping the chance of one person taking control. In democracies the good of the country as a whole is considered, whereas dictatorships are selfish and

America is synonymous with the word freedom, even being dubbed “the land of the free” by its own national anthem. But, what makes America so much more “free” than other countries? Some would argue that it’s America’s system of democracy, despite the fact that democratic governments are now the most common form of rule found in countries around the world. American democracy, although effective, is not the best democracy style for all nations; because, like many other countries, its government contains many flaws, including: its low voter turnout, two-party political parties creating division and deadlock in congress, and government positions of power being bankrolled and controlled by the rich.

As systems of government, Democracy and Dictatorship exhibit key differences in how leaders are elected, power is distributed and how people are governed. Nations that have a democratic element are those where the people have a substantial say, through a system of voting, about who is representing them in the government, and where leaders are not governing for life. In