Imagine, disappointed students because they are at a disadvantage in scholarship competitions from students in other school districts, caused by the fact that they have fewer AP and Honors classes than them. They are put further in debt as they waste money unsure of what their major should be after they graduate from high school. In the school, classes are filled to the max with students, making the class difficult to teach. Teachers struggling to properly prepare for and handle the workload of 5 different classes. This is not something one has to imagine, because this the reality of East Jordan Middle High School. East Jordan is facing all of these problems, because EJMHS is understaffed. East Jordan does not have enough teaching staff as …show more content…
Smaller classes would result in stronger student teacher connections. When there is a smaller group in a class there are fewer students that a teacher has to get to know in that class and can have a better one on one connection with the students. By having a smaller class they can get to know students deeply. A larger amount of staff means there could be multiple sections of the same class, making the classes smaller. That allows for stronger connections between students and teachers, meaning that a teacher can reach out to students, and can understand their students better. Smaller classes will also give students a greater chance to ask questions. Fewer students means that students can ask the questions about what they don’t understand because there isn’t 30 other people trying to ask a question. Smaller classes mean that questions are more likely to be answered giving the student an in depth understanding of the subject. The final reason that hiring staff would improve classes by making them smaller is that it is extremely difficult to teach a large class. A larger amount of people causes for difficulty in maneuvering around the classroom. This can diminish the class level and diminish what the students take away from that class. It is easier to move around 20 people and not 35. Having enough teachers means that teaching a class would be improved. With …show more content…
Increasing the teaching staff would help teachers by limiting the variety in the homework the teachers are responsible for grading. Teachers have the responsibility of teaching all sorts of different classes because there are limited staff. With a wide variety of classes that means a wide variety of homework for teachers; consequently, when at home grading, teachers are forced to switch from homework to homework, and idea to idea. Hiring additional staff would mean that teacher would teach all similar subjects therefore limiting the variety of homework and making teachers lives better. Furthermore EJHS must expand the staff because it would help teachers prep for classes. Teachers have a large variety of classes and an awfully short prep time. Teachers at EJMHS are expected to prep for 5 classes in 50 minutes, giving only 10 minutes of prep time a day for teachers. If teachers only had to teach 4 or 3 types of classes, a teacher can have a greater amount of time to prep for each class. By increasing the amount of staff, teachers would teach fewer types of classes, meaning that a teacher could prepare extremely thoroughly for one class. Teachers are able to produce high quality lesson plans and enhance the lessons they teach. Obviously, East Jordan High School must expand the number of staff in order to make the teachers exceptionally effective in their
Overcrowded schools are one of the many reasons why America is falling backwards. With high birth rates and continuous immigration flow the classroom has become overcrowded. The best way a student can learn is if the attention is not so divided. With large classrooms having over 30 students, it makes it almost impossible for a teacher to attend to each student equally. “Slavin (1989) reviewed those studies that lasted a minimum of 1 year and had 20 students or fewer. He concluded that substantial reductions in class size have a small positive effect on students” (Synopsis of Class Size Literature). Classrooms should be small enough for a teacher to perform well without divided attention. In smaller classrooms, students are recognized for their contribution and participation. Students can respect the work of their peers individually and learn from them and help maintain order. They have more time to be collaborative, work creatively, think critically and draw their own predictions. In “Every Classroom Teacher’s Dream”, Patricia Handley states that “Teachers have more opportunity for personalized assessment with students, such as individual conferencing. With a small class, teacher can maximize best teaching practices, heightening students’ academic achievement” (6). There is ample evidence on how a small classroom can improve so much.
The class size is surprising to most students because the tuition is so reasonable. While classes aren't as small as those of a leading private university, many have as few as twenty students. In a smaller class, professors have the opportunity to learn more about their students. Likewise, students will find their teachers more accessible and can get assistance when they need it.
Students will still learn the same way, whether there are a lot of students or a little. Smaller class size do not make a student perform better, that is up to the student, not the class size. Students can learn in any type of environment; class size does not matter when it comes to a students learning ability. Learning is not about where the knowledge is learned, it is about how it is learned and if a student is willing to learn it. Some might also oppose that colleges should not make students take liberal arts classes.
Having smaller classes will help me to concentrate in class and better concentration can help me to achieve better grades. I find that when I am in a classroom with a large group of students
The evidence suggests that increasing class size will not only harm children’s test scores in the short-run, but also in their long-run human capital formation. Money is saved from increasing class size will be more substantial social and educational costs in the future. In addition to high costs, reducing class size have unintended consequences. When California lowered class sizes in 1996, they realized that they did not have enough teachers to meet the challenge. Schools were forced to hire new teachers and add portable classmates to accommodate the state
A small class is consider to be twenty students or less. In smaller schools there are not as many students so the teachers will be able to help the students more one on one. Students can have a better idea of the content that they are learning and even if they don’t understand then the could talk to the teacher to have a better understanding. In a recent study, students and teachers were randomly assigned to a small class, with an average of 15 students, or a regular class, with an average of 22 students. This large reduction in class size (7 students, or 32 percent) was found to increase student achievement by an amount equivalent to about 3 additional months of schooling four years later. Also, increasing the pupil/teacher ratio in the U.S. by one student would save at least $12 billion per year in teacher salary costs alone, which is roughly
In conclusion, schools need to come up with a way to enhance student to teacher associations, better security measures for students and schools that are financially responsible. If schools can agree on a way to make class life better for students we will see a significant increase in schools production. The system is corrupt and without a plan cannot be fixed. Schools need a base to start in order to make progress to
This year, the united federation of teachers, New Yorks teachers union, did a annual survey and they found out that 7,000 classrooms exceeded the limits acceptable for proper learning. Students should get more individual attention for their learning process and to be able to perform better in grades. The size of a class is very important for many schools like this one because of educational
In 2008, a study was done by Zahorik and a few of his colleagues, and they found that in smaller classes, the discipline was actually worried about less than in bigger classes, thus proving that students have better behavior in smaller classes because of the student and teacher ratio and the desire to be less distracting. Students with learning or behavioral disabilities also will get the chance to have more individualized plans and more one on one teacher time.
Small groups received much more individualized attention from the teacher. The chance of the teacher being able to evaluate and involved all the children in discussion is much more intense and positive when you have a group of five instead of twenty. Teachers are able to interact and observe the students in the small groups and be able to evaluate and act on any issues that the
With the lack of high-quality research related to the effects of class size on student achievement, there is not a valid argument for decreasing class size in our schools. Additionally, taking on the extra 1-2 students in each class will only help with master scheduling issues and course offerings. If we continue to reduce class size, our students are the ones who will be negatively impacted as we will be unable to provide certain courses for all students. There are instances when a teacher may have one to two sections of a given class, and if we are a few students over, those students cannot take the course they want, or possibly need. This is not an issue we want to face, nor do we want to deny our students a proper education that fits their own individual needs. The flexibility of being able to include up to 36 students in any one class ensures that there is enough space for more of our students. In an effort to convince the Teachers Association to concede to this change, it is appropriate to offer them something in return. In this instance, it may be fitting to offer to keep elementary class size pupil-teacher ratio to 1:28, making it clear that we will not ask to increase their class size if they agree to the 4-12 growth. Increasing class size is vital for the district as we are forging ahead into uncertain times with the closing of our primary source of revenue, Diablo Canyon. We have to be
To begin, east Jordan schools must have clubs to help students community. The way this helps their surrounding is by giving back to their community. Students that go around town and help their stores or help their community. Students would makes their community better in many
As a parent, one would want the best available education for their child or children. This care is provided more by small or local schools rather than large schools. One reason small schools are more effective than large schools is the more readily available assistance. With a smaller student body, teachers and staff have more opportunities and time to work directly with individuals or groups. The increased opportunities to work individually with a staff member also proves that there can be deeper connections between staff and students, as well as in between the student body and between staff members. Better relations with the people you go to school or teach with is bound to give better results. In addition, a smaller school often means a
Smaller schools offer a more personal experience than bigger schools.“Smaller schools offer a more one-on-one experience between teachers and students” (Size matters: The difference between big and small schools). The system has about 13-15 kids in each class.” This allows about 400 kids in the whole school” says Bruce O Baker.This allows the students to be singled out if they are struggling. The teacher can also focus on each individual student for a longer amount of time because the teacher won't have 30 kids talking all at once and not being able to get to everyone that has questions. This will allow the students to understand the material. The teachers can also teach better, in theory, because there won't be as many distractions in the
It is pretty apparent that in America, and elsewhere, most parents and general adults want what is best for their children in terms of education. This mindset can be seen reflected in the legislative aspects of our education system; there are many incentives pushing through the school boards and legislatures of our nation in order to attempt to further refine the education system. This is important as it allows us to refine traditional American education in order to improve upon it, and one of these attempt refinements and improvements has to deal with the subject of class size. For many people, large classroom sizes are a spawning ground for many issues with the education system: high distraction in the classroom, teacher inefficiency, among a plethora of others. Although it may seem regressive to favor small classes over bigger, more potentially diverse classes, small class sizes are more beneficial for education in that it is less distracting for the students and raises the possibility of staying focused, it potentially raises teacher-student relationships, and it allows for better results and better statistics coming from these smaller classes.