preview

African-American Military Resistance

Decent Essays

also holdovers from World War I, passed down by family members (Roberts 94). From the discussion in Roberts’ book the French Resistance members were better received than the actual French military (95). Resistance members were considered to have been the French people who never gave up fighting, unlike the French military. Although more positively received, the Resistance members were considered hasty and wild in their tactics. One of the main issues with the working relationship between the American and French militaries was the American military’s overall goal for the Allied armies. According to Keene, the American military thought very highly of American methods and tried to teach them to the Allied army. Hidden within these attempts of teaching the Allied army the “better” American methods were attempting to Americanize our military allies. If the Americans can prove to the Europeans that America is the leading member in technology, culture, and methodology, then American gains prestige and economic advantages. As well as promoting the American ideology of democracy and freedom. Although their first intentions were winning the war, Americans also want to promote their beliefs and convert the rest of the world. …show more content…

One of the largest social norm that the Americans introduced to France was the Jim Crow laws. On average, African American soldier’s experiences in France are defined as having both good and bad experiences. The European continent presented African American soldiers more freedoms than their home, but still had certain limitations. As racial discrimination was still prevalent in the American military during both wars. This racial discrimination from their own military soured relationships with French communities as

Get Access