America's Healthcare: Change...But How? Essay

The health care system must change to improve our nation’s health and takes strong steps to address the unsustainable growth of health care costs in America. We still have a long way to go before our health system become effective. We still have population that do not have insurance, have difficulties accessing their health care, or their needs are not met within the healthcare system. It is an investment in prevention and wellness and increasing access to primary care physician.

The New York Times printed an article by Robert Pear, which reported that on December 24, 2009, the US senate passed the first bill, which would call for major reform regarding health care in the United States (Pear). The article titled “Senate Passes Health Care Overhaul on Party-Line Vote,” discusses the fact that while this step was a major milestone in the process of providing Americans with affordable heath care, it was not the end of the road. Over the coming months and years there would be a lot of give and take between democrats and republicans to revise the bill to the point where both sides could support it. One of the major points in this reform is that the US government was now going to offer affordable plans including subsidy options which would allow more Americans affordable options which were

The American Health Care system needs to be constantly improved to keep up with the demands of America’s health care system. In order for the American Health Care system to improve policies must be constantly reviewed. Congress still plays a powerful role in public policy making (Morone, Litman, & Robins, 2008). A health care policy is put in place to reach a desired health outcome, which may have a meaningful effect on people. People in position of authority advocates for a new policy for the group they have special interest in helping. The Health care system is formed by the health care policy making process (Abood, 2007). There are public, institutional, and business policies related to health care developed by hospitals, accrediting organizations, or managed care organizations (Abood, 2007). A policy is implemented to improve the health among people in the United States. Some policies

In recent years, health care has been a huge topic in public debates, legislations, and even in deciding who will become the next president. There have been many acts, legislations, and debates on what the country has to do in regards to health care. According to University of Phoenix Read Me First HCS/235 (n.d.), “How health care is financed influences access to health care, how health care is delivered, the quality of health care provided, and its cost”.

Our healthcare system needs major restructuring. Major improvements needs to begin with "all health care organizations, professional groups, and private and public purchasers should adopt as their explicit purpose to continually reduce the burden of illness, injury, and disability, and to improve the health and functioning of the people of the United States", (Crossing the ……, 2001).

Healthcare has been at the forefront of United States public policy for decades. Ever since President Roosevelt proposed healthcare reform during his 1912 run for president, reform has been a policy position often espoused in American politics, culminating with Social Security in the 1930s, Medicare in the 1960s, and finally the Affordable Care Act in 2010 (Palmer 1). While the goal of the Affordable Care Act is to provide care for every American, the United States has never fully adopted a single payer system; a healthcare system that provides universal care to every American. Furthermore, current systems within the United States that maintain single-payer attributes are subject to scrutiny from politicians and activists alike. While

The Clinton proposal was an attempt to reform America’s broken health care system. On September 22, 1993, President Clinton revealed his plan to Congress and to the world. What he did not take in to account was the actors and stakeholders involved and how they would affect the political feasibility of the Clinton Healthcare becoming a law. Perhaps, if he had used the Delphi technique- a systematic approach to assessing political feasibility that typically relies on surveys of stakeholders, but can also include surveys of experts who ae not direct stakeholders (McLaughlin &McLaughlin, 2014 p.281), he would have known the opposition he faced and the difficult task they lay ahead. The stakeholders and actors listed below all have their own motives

While there are numerous healthcare stakeholders, three sway the legislature through powerful lobbying efforts, and one whose voice gets lost in the rhetoric. Before discussing the legislative role, let us look at four important stakeholders.

The Health care reform has been a major issue over the past decade. In December, 2009, the decision was made to pass the health care reform ("ANA", 2010, p. 10). This decision will change America forever, and the nursing industry will help hold this new program together by constituting the largest single group of health care professionals. The nursing industry will be the glue holding the new healthcare intact. It is

With the government playing a major role in the healthcare system, everything is more so about politics: staying in office or the party that one favor the most holding the most power. As a result, it is difficult to reform the healthcare system so that average citizens will benefit from it when it is essentially not designed to keep opposing parties from benefiting. I agree with Dr. Romper when he said the system is torn between the way democrats and republicans think it should be reformed. He suggest that both parties should work together and use each other's ideas to reform our healthcare system. Instead of finding fault in the opposing party's plan for health care reform, the parties should both unite and realize that neither plan is perfect but together their plans may work best. Overall, the United States’ health care systems cannot improve if it's centered around politics and money and not the health care of

Who resists the call for change? Who defends the status quo? Doctors are among the most highly paid professionals in our society. The current system benefits them by limiting the education and licensing of doctors, thus creating low supply in the face of increasingly high demand. Insurance companies, with the input of physicians, determine the rate of reimbursement for physician services. Health care corporations continue to be good investments, despite the recession. The pejorative term “socialized medicine”, first coined by a “free market” focus group opposing President Truman’s attempt to create a government sponsored health care system in the 1940’s, has successfully forestalled change by frightening the public with images of inept and oppressive governmental interference in health care. The current system, unjust, inadequate and expensive, continues to profit the few ( doctors, pharmaceutical corporations, hospital corporations, HMO’s politicians) to the detriment of all. This is a rank issue. Who profits the most resists change the most, and uses rank to influence and obstruct. The medical-industrial-congressional complex, which comprises-----of our gross domestic product, overtly and covertly, opposes change which threatens their interests (“profits”) opposes health care reform and justice. They have the money, the access to influence at the highest levels of government, and they have used a profit seeking media effectively to influence citizens to preserve the status

In accordance with the authors health reform is on the way its lacking in clarity, but overall it will play out over time. As the reform is tested and adjusted on a large-scale healthcare providers will receive a grace period to execute repositioning initiatives. For the organization to have any means of succession they need to understand change to obtain their specified goal that way they can strengthen and develop competencies to position their organization for succession.

It has a dual role to play if there is to be a reform in the current health care market, taking a stance as both facilitator and regulator (2003 p.183), clearly defining to all key players what the acceptable quality of health care is, and educating the consumers (patients) on their right to demand for better services from their health care providers. It is imperative that an avenue for dialogue is created between the private and public sectors to enable them reach a common consensus and set the objectives and goals they want to achieve in revamping the health sector within a timeline. A committee should be set up to constantly evaluate these sectors to ensure that the objectives are met and are producing the desired

Involving stakeholders in this policy change is vital to actually incorporating change within the community. Legislators, the business community, health departments, schools, hospitals, and community residents would all have very good opinions for both sides of this issue.

In light of these challenges, a need for review and reform of our healthcare practices has become apparent.