An analysis of American – Chinese movie ‘Saving face” by using Face Negotiation Theory
Table of contents Face Negotiation Theory 2 An application of face-negotiation theory in the movie “Saving face” (2004) 3 Advantages and disadvantages of face theory 6 Conclusion 7 References 8
The term “face-negotiation theory” was first introduced by Stella Ting-Toomey, a Professor of Human Communication Studies at California State University, in 1988 based on amazing works of Goffman in 1955 and Levinson and Brown in 1987 (Oetzel & Ting-Toomey 2003). According to Griffin (2005), the main idea of this theory is to clarify people coming from dissimilar cultures will have different ways in managing conflicts as well as communication.
…show more content…
At the end, both Gao and Wil decide to protect their love.
According to Hofstede (1980), American and China are significant example for the disparities in culture, one is a low-context culture with the individualistic society and another is a high-context culture with the collectivistic society respectively.
In this movie, there is a scene that Gao’s father – Mr. Wai Gung was extremely angry when he fought out that his daughter got pregnant and Gao tried to keep the secret about the father of this baby. Gao thought that getting pregnant without a husband was not a bad thing and when her father said “She is no longer a part of this family”, she said that “Father, please don’t feel shamed”. He responded that “How can I not feel shame? My own rotten flesh has gotten pregnant without a husband. You don’t think people will laugh at me? The professor speaks big words but can’t control his daughter?”. “She can throw her reputation away, but it still comes back to this family. Get out of this house. Don’t come back until you have a husband” he said.
In this situation, it supports the idea that collectivists in general and Chinese in particular often choose avoiding style as well as try to save a mutual-face and other-face more than different groups (Griffin 2005). Although they lived in American for a long time but they are the first generation so they still belong to collectivistic group (Samovar, Porter &
Every nations and communities has its own cultures and they are different from each other, here are the differences in the parameters between my culture which is influenced by Vietnamese culture and the USA's culture.
According to the Merriam Webster dictionary, the definition of culture is “the customary beliefs, social forms, and material traits of a racial, religious, or social group”. Every country has its specific culture and there are some obvious cultural universals between China and America. One example of such cultural universal is the directness of American versus the humbleness of the Chinese people. Another example would be the self independence of the young Americans versus the young Chinese who tend to depend on their parents. What I would like to cover are the holidays observed by United States and China, roles played in the family by husband and wife, parenting styles and conflict management.
Made in China Essay Aditi Agarwal 12/15/14 B-Block World History Ms. Fitz Culture defines how citizens of a country live their life. Culture also can spread from one country to another, then can be modified by countries, then spread again. Countries adopt culture based on how interesting or beneficial elements of the culture they are adopting is. The culture of advanced societies is often adopted by countries who want to follow their example. A country that was very successful was China.
Culture is defined by a construction of one's world-view, and it is transmitted by individuals and collectives through socialization and enculturation (Pederson & Ivey, 13). It contains values, beliefs, language, and perception. In studying cultural differences among members of distinct national, ethnic groups researcher have examined the concept of collectivism and individualism. People form individualistic cultures tend to view themselves as unique entities and independent form one another (Coon & Kemmelmeier, 348)
Explanation: Hofstede 's framework rates Japan and Singapore as "collectivist" and the United States as "individualistic." A collectivist cultures has a stronger group identity than an individualistic culture.
According to Lee Chew, a Chinese immigrant who arrived in the 1870’s , Chinese people had minimalistic life styles. They were unpretentious because they had an
Everyone, every social class and every country have their own unique values. It is the fact that value is the core of cross-culture communication and the differences of culture among countries depend on different values. Value exerts great influence on everyone’s daily life. Scores of people rely on value to obtain knowledge, master the basic skills and foster correct world outlook. China and America are two opposite countries in terms of different values. It exists in many different fields in China and America such as politics, literature and family structure. The essence of these differences actually reflects the cultural differences. The word
I am going to mainly focus about Helen and Theresa, which are the characters in Typical American and picked up some similarities with Chinese American women Anita woo which is the character in That man in our lives. What I want to see is how the books described the variation in Confucian value among those women. Nevertheless, I noticed that there was one of the reasons cause the variation. All of this three characters influenced by the American consumer culture. American consumer culture was one of the reason made Helen and Theresa doubted their Confucian value and shifted to western value. Anita Woo was influenced by the consumer culture after her retirement too. She madly in love with shopping. I will focus on the link to consumer culture to
Individuals by and large are motivated to act in a particular fashion which is different from others or which can also be similar to the way someone else acts. How these two differ is depended on various factors such as personal characteristics, their social circle, parental influence and cultural orientation. In this essay I would like to discuss about the cultural orientation aspect to be more precise about the balance between individualism and collectivism i.e. the balance between me/we. Individualism and collectivism is something that hasn’t changed since decades and it in a way shapes who we are as humans. It is a conflicting view of the human nature, society in which the humans reside and their relationship with it.
On the contrary, collectivist societies value conformity, and are more concerned with the success of the group as a whole (Goncalo & Staw, 2006). One of the key differences between the two is the structure of the family unit and the significance placed on maintaining close family ties. Collectivist societies follow a hierarchical system with the patriarchal figure given ultimate power and respect. The importance of family is not valued as highly in individualist societies. For example, while it would be typical for a family living under one roof to consist of many generations and extended relations in China, it would seem highly unusual if the same was to occur in a country such as the United States of America (USA) (Jyh-Shen Chiou, 2001). This is due to the heavy emphasis placed on collectivism in China. Western countries, including the USA, are traditionally viewed as individualist societies (Cai, Wilson, & Drake, 2000). As there is no clear distinction between the family unit and the individual in collectivist cultures, the reputation of the family name is closely tied to the behaviour of every person. Embarrassing one’s self would be to bring shame to the
The Face-Negotiation theory suggests there are three goals that any conflict will revolve around; content, relational and identity, or rather, needs, interests or goals. Based on M. Afzalur Rahim’s work, Dr. Ting-Toomey and later John Oetzel, identified eight distinct responses to conflicting situations based on an incompatibility (Griffin
“Stella Ting-Toomey’s face negotiation theory helps explain cultural differences in responses to conflict (Griffin, 2009). People do not respond to conflict in the same manner. Reponses vary according to culture, goals, desires, and self-image. According to Fullerton, “a communication professor at California State University, Ting-Toomey assumes that people of every culture are always negotiating face. Face is “the projected image of one’s self in a relational situation, the way that we want others to see us and treat us” (Griffin, 2009). Simply, the Golden Rule, “do unto others as you would have others do unto you.”
What are some of the salient characteristics and differences between high and low context cultures?
The term “behavior” refers one’s acts dominated by ideology in response to certain situations. Behavior derives from the long development of culture in which people are defined what is supposed to act based on the identity given. In other words, one’s behavior sometimes is the demonstration of one’s identity. Living in a multi-culture world, people from various cultures may behave totally different toward a situation or stimulus. Western and eastern cultures typically reflects the point of behavioral differentiations among distinct cultures. The United States, as a superpower established in last hundreds of years, possesses distinguishing features of western culture such as open and liberty. Meanwhile, China is an eastern country with an ancient civilization stands for conservative culture. Therefore, as represents of these two cultures, the United States and China are appropriate examples to explore the behavioral differentiations, and the differences in behavior can be well demonstrated through daily behaviors like classroom, driving and dining.
This essay will discuss the influence of cultural dimensions on behavior. A cultural dimension is defined as a perspective of a culture based on its values and cultural norms. In particular, Hofstede’s cultural dimension of individualism vs. collectivism will be discussed. Individualism vs collectivism is defined as the preference of a person only being concerned about oneself and looking after oneself, compared to a person who wants to remain in a closely knitted network. These are some terms with definitions which will be used in this essay: the Asch paradigm, which refers to the studies conducted by Solomon Asch, in which he showed his participants different lines and asked them to verbally judge and respond as to what the length of the