“The Organic Effect” is a video that conduct an experiment on a family for two weeks. The video was promoted by an organic food store The Coop grocery in Sweden and the Swedish Environmental Research Institute ( Hall ). In this video a family of five switched from conventional food to organic for two weeks. Before beginning the experiment urine samples were taken and analyzed for conventional pesticides food. It turned out that they had different insecticides, fungicides, and plant growth regulators inside their bodies. The experiment began and everything in the kitchen was replaced from conventional to organic food only ( Hall ). Then Another sample of urine was taken and almost all the pesticides disappeared; the level dropped drastically ( Hall ). At the beginning of the video the mother explained why her family chose to eat conventional food, and it was because it’s less expensive for her big family. However, at the end of the experiment she said that she was reevaluating her decision because of her children ( Hall ).
Kavin Senapathy wrote an article based on the video because the advertisements mislead the public, and they didn’t offer the whole story to the audience (Senapathy ). She explained that the study was done in only one family and they just analyzed the urine for pesticide used on conventional food only and most people didn’t realize that organic agriculture uses pesticides too (Hall ). The company is being suing by Emil Karlsson at Debunking Denialism for
In addition, certain organic foods are more beneficial because they contain more nutrients in comparison to nonorganic foods. One product that supports this claim is corn. Cheryl Long, journalist for the Green Gazette, states, “Likewise, a study of 45 corn varieties developed from 1920 to 2001, grown side by side, found that the concentrations of protein, oil and three amino acids have all declined in the newer varieties. Six minerals have declined by 22 to 39 percent.” These are all nonorganic, commercially grown products. Because organic farming does not involve pesticides, the foods produced are able to grow at a natural pace along with a normal hormone rate depending on the product, such as poultry and a variety of other meats and produce. Accordingly, this allows the consumer to obtain the optimum percentages of nutrients from each of the products they buy. If people consumed only nonorganic products, they would have less nutrient intake as well as
An arising food category in America is anything organic. Over the years, several local grocery stores organic section is rapidly increasing. Michael Pollan, who wrote Omnivore's Dilemma, is a New York Times bestselling author. Pollan stated, “Forty years ago there was no such category as ‘organic’ food. Today it is a $20-billion business- the fastest growing part of the food industry.” (112) With organic farming becoming more common, there are many changes being made that are resulting in significant outcomes. One of the substantial changes while using organic farming is the improved treatment and health of animals. Further knowledge and awareness of the importance on how organic farming is better for the lives of animals, as well as our health is needed. Gaining more education on animals lives with organic farming, will potentially lead organic food becoming the most popular because of its remarkable outcomes.
Have you ever wondered if organic foods are actually better for you? What if organic foods are not actually healthy and are just an immense scam from food companies to take your money away from you? In the documentary, In Organic We Trust, the narrator Kip Pastor attempts to persuade the viewers that although the food system may be flawed, organic foods are actually better to consume. Pastor’s use of pathos and logos in this documentary are extremely credible and well structured, but the ethos Pastor provided in this documentary are not as well structured as the pathos and logos. Pastor doses an excellent job in structuring the film “In Organic We Trust”, in an attempt to send his message across to the viewers. In the documentary in order
For example, in the 1990s, there was a food scare, called Alar. “Alar was a chemical conventional growers sprayed on apples to help them ripen. In 1990 the Environmental Protection Agency found that Alar could cause cancer” (Pollan, 2009, p. 117). Since the EPA found that Alar could cause cancer, the was a huge jump in the demand for organic foods. In the book, Omnivore's Dilemma, it states, “According to the book Omnivore's Dilemma, it states,¨In a shed attached to the mill sit vat of liquid vitamins. Beside them are fifty-pound sacks of antibiotic drugs¨ (p.55). Industrial farmers who raise cattle, use antibiotics and other medications to make their cows grow faster and fatter. In conclusion, industrial organic is better for your family because there aren’t harmful chemicals like Alar, being used to produce your crops. Also, the farmers don't feed the animals medications and drugs to make them grow fat. They use organic feds which are better for the animals and resulting in a better tasting
With the sales of organic foods rapidly increasing in recent years, jumping from $1 billion to $21 billion in just eighteen years, it is important for consumers to be well-informed when choosing either organic or inorganic (Bradbury et al, 2014). These products, with labels boasting claims such as no artificial fertilizers or pesticides and the use of ecologically friendly farming techniques, have become somewhat of a trend since their arrival in the early to mid twentieth century. As the public becomes increasingly cautious of what they eat, concern has been growing regarding the adverse health effects of ingestion of pesticides and artificial fertilizers in food products. It is not surprising, therefore, that perceived health
Mitchum, Michelle is an American journalist and author, she writes, reports for news channels and a filmmaker. She states in Organic food, that for the past two decades the consumption of organic food has radically changed, by twenty-five billion dollars from 1996 to 2016. This accumulative grow is a result of people briefs' that organic food free pesticides, chemical and grown in good arable, are healthier form nutrition and health wise than controversially grown food. The subject separates like deadly disease and brings attention to competent health authorities and forced development, processing of conventionally grown foods to be aware of their next move, then the public starts questioning themselves the effect of consuming food that's been grown in an increasing profit method. There are enough researches to prove
On the contrary, many may argue that even though organic food at times possess such threats they do not come close to comparing to the threats possessed by chemically treated foods. Researchers such as Joanna Jurewicz, believe that children being exposed to pesticides at any time during foetal life will have some type of health effect. She addressed that each year “almost 50,000 children are poisoned annually by exposure to pesticides” (Jurewicz 71), while emphasizing that the most common health effects are on foetus and young children. She proposed that all acute exposures to pesticides cause “skin irritation, lesions in the respiratory tract, and severe toxic neurologic effects”, in long exposure she blames their constant motive to put everything in their mouth and their immature detoxification systems with how they are the easy target for pesticides and chemical
The clear conclusions drawn from numerous studies targeting organic food are that organic food does not equal safe food, does not have clear nutritional advantage and does not have reduced level of naturally occurring toxins over conventional plants or livestock (80, 81). Fertilization enriches soils and provides nutrients in food, regardless of it being organic or chemical fertilizer. Risk of exposure to microbial contamination is not lower in organic food (82). Level of naturally occurring toxins such as aflatoxins in peanuts and grains, solanine in green parts of potatoes, goitrogens in some raw vegetables, and other poisons in mushrooms and herbs is not affected by the method of growing (81). Pesticides usages are monitored and will not pose harm to health when applied in regulated manner. However, the amount of pesticides residue is usually lower in organic food (82). One observational study and one systematic review found no protective value of organic food over eczema or atopy diseases (83, 84). Hence the claims being made over benefits of organic food can be concluded as misleading at best, and there is a pressing need for proper public education on this issue
A healthy diet leading to a longer life. Doctors recommend organic foods for patients with heart or glucose problems and nutritional scientists have glorified it as the new fountain of youth. However, the truth is coming to light that these claims might be false, that organic foods might be causing people more harm than one may think. In his essay “What Are You Buying When You Buy Organic?” Author Steven Shapin states that “Earthbound notes that its farming techniques annually obviate the use of more than a quarter of a million pounds of toxic chemical pesticides and almost 8.5 million pounds of synthetic fertilizers, which saves 1.4 million gallons of the
In the world we live in today the population has increased to more than seven billion people with a life expectancy of seventy years old. As the years continue to progress this number is expected to double within twenty five to thirty years as it raises daily. Over the years, the agricultural field has changed dramatically. Most farmers and businesses who are specialize in food production utilize pesticides and hormones to mass produce the food we eat. While these processed are great for business, it is harmful for the human body. It is for this reason that people must be conscious about what they consume. As the inhabitants in America increase, the population of organic food decreases. Both, people and animals, had
Many believe that the food grown may be good for the environment but obtaining the products counteracts the process and overall benefits of acquiring organic foods. This idea is because food is flown in from places all over the world on planes whose exhaust is polluting the environment just as much as the non organic farming. Another view made by a spokeswoman for the Agriculture Department said, “The government’s organic program is a market program that sets standards for what can be certified as organic. Neither the enabling legislation nor the regulations address food safety or nutrition” (Bittman 2). This statement may prove to be correct, but when taking polls of those who eat organic and those who do not, the ones who eat organically experience benefits that are much higher. Digesting organic food has proven to reduce risks of terminal illnesses, such as diabetes and even cancer. Beyond physical health, buyers mentally feel more positively towards themselves and their
Video “ Infact: Organic Food Myths” by Brian Dunning (DATE). Dunning two main points are: what is organic and is it healthier. According to Dunning what makes food organic is how it is farmed. Organic farming rejects modern agriculture development. To my surprise I found out that organic products are grown with fertilizer and pesticides, just as nonorganic products. The word organic is use as a marking tool to get individual to buy their products. Dunning also bring up that yes you may find a few study that says organic is healthier, but there are more study that show their no different. Each individual has the choice to believe what we want. Education is key knowing more about organic food is beneficial so am not fouled into spending
Organic farming practices have greatly advanced the use of non-chemical means to control pests, as mentioned earlier. Unfortunately, these non-chemical methods do not always provide enough protection, and it’s necessary to use chemical pesticides. Data is collected from the origin of the produce (i.e. farmers) and where it is sold (i.e. Walmart, Whole Foods, H.E.B., etc.). Researchers haven’t bothered to study the effects of organic pesticides because it is assumed that “natural” chemicals are automatically safe. However, researchers have done a quantitative study on how these pesticides and chemicals affect a person’s personal health. They chose eight different pesticides in relation to their chemical structures and physico-chemical properties (Barriuso, Andrades, Benoit, and Houot 122). Six pesticides were non-ionic in most environmental conditions and two were weak acid or base (Barriuso, Andrades, Benoit, and Houot 122). They also used two different compost, green waste and sewage sludge, to conduct fermentation on plants as well as the texture and type of soil (Barriuso, Andrades, Benoit, and Houot 123). Studying the affects of pesticides and chemicals will later provide us information on what we consume by eating organic
This raises a marketing problem, though, because it has been simpler to make the environmental argument for organic nourishment than the health argument. The environmental advantages of the organic academic procedure should not be undervalued, but the industrialization of organic comes at a cost. The most clear cost is consolidation. To a certain extent as a consequence, the cost incentive for organic harvests is getting smaller. Pesticide reminders are ubiquitous in the American food stock. The Food and Drug Administration locates them in about 35 percent of the food it
Thesis: Choosing to purchase and consume organic food is a smart and healthy choice for you and your family.