Many factors influence character. As a person grows, their personality can either be innate or developed by their environment. Depending on the situation, one factor’s influence can outweigh the other. In Flatland, irregulars are oppressed and killed; they do not flourish in their environment. The generalization of the character of irregulars portray them in a bad light. Nurture has a greater influence on character development for irregulars since they live in a negative environment that restrain them from ever becoming productive members of their society. To begin with, nature is defined as the inherited characteristics that an individual has when born. The characteristics that are developed and influenced by the individual’s environment are defined as nurture. The debate of whether nature or nurture has greater influence on a person’s personality is a long-standing debate. A consensus can be reached. Nature and nurture both influence individuals, it is a subtle cooperation. Rather than the terminology being "nature versus nurture," it is nature "and" nurture. The amount of influence the factors give is not evenly distributed, rather it varies by person. A person could have a natural ability to play an instrument. This can only take them so far though, without practice they would never be able to improve/perfect their style. Nurture takes their ability to the next level.
The whole social system of Flatland is based on regularity. A figure 's sides should be equal and there
One of the oldest debates in psychology is nature versus nurture. Nature is the inborn, innate character of an organism. (Spencer A. Rathus pg. 56) Nurture is the sum total of the environmental factors that affect an organism from conception onward. (Spencer A. Rathus pg. 56) Basically nature is what you have from heredity and nurture is you environmental influences.
When we compare nature to nurture, we have to know what they mean. Nature is looking at the genetics, and the biological way you are made. Something you have usually have no control over. There have been some serial killers in
Nature or Nurture. Nature may be all of the genes and hereditary factors with which influence them to become who they are such as physical appearances and personality characteristics. Nurturing impacts people’s lives as well as how they are raised and all the environmental factors. In combination, these qualities can be the true identity of oneself. Many people may argue that nurture appears to a play huge factor in the two, but others may think otherwise. Not having both as a characteristic can have a negative effect on a person physically and mentally. The debate of nature versus nurture appears to be the oldest argument known to man, and it still remains to be unanswered. In the old-age argument nature versus nurture, nature may play a huge role in determining a person’s true identity.
Nature versus Nurture is the issue of the degree to which environment and heredity influence behavior and development. In this issue nature can be defined as, behaviors due to heredity. Which means behaviors are based on the genetic makeup of an individual and is an influence of the individuals' growth and development throughout life. On the other hand nurture are causes of behaviors that are environmental. Which means the influence is from, parents, siblings, family, friends and all other experiences to which the individual is exposed to.
In the "nature vs nurture" debate, nature refers to an individual's innate qualities (nativism). Nature is your genes. The physical and personality traits determined by your genes stay the same irrespective of where you were born and raised. Nature factors that trigger an individual to commit crime are influences by biological and family factors. The nature method suggests that individuals are born with qualities, abilities and characteristics that determine the kind of person that individual will become.
This form characterization is one of opinion. For example, the cities within the river valleys identified as civilized, however, they succumbed to drinking alcohol, the mistreatment of children and lack self control, yet they often called nomadic societies barbaric and crude when in fact they just acted in a different manners and routines from the nomads and hunter-gathers.
Nature-nature debate is a very old one, dating back to Aristotle, who argued that we are born blank slates and everything we become is a product of the external world. While Greek philosopher Plato said intelligence and behavior were innate (Myers & DeWall, 2016, p.8). As psychology has progressed throughout the years, in general, it is believed that both nature and nurture influence behavior and development (Thinking Critically Lecture).
Nature means the hereditary information we receive from our parents at the moment of conception. Nurture means the complex forces of the physical and social world that influence our
The nature vs Nurture debate allows us to see if behavioral tendencies, personality attributes and mental abilities are already a part of us before we are already born. Nature is influenced by genetic inheritance and biological factors. Nurture is the influence of external factors after conception, with experience and learning
Nature alludes to the majority of the qualities and inherited elements that impact who we are from our physical appearance to our identity attributes. Nurture alludes to all the natural variables that effect who we are, including our initial adolescence encounters, how we were raised, our social connections, and our encompassing society. There are still arguments as to which in fact influences us. While we are being affected by both we are more impacted by nurture. Nature and nurture are big parts of our lives, we cannot have one with the other they shape who we are, however nurture is a bigger influence.
The difference between Nature and Nurture is that Nature refers to all of the genes and hereditary factors that influence who we are, from our physical appearance to our personality characteristics. Whereas nurture refers to all the environmental variables that impact who we are, including our early childhood experiences, how we were raised, our social relationships and our surrounding culture. Nature is innate, it is things we are born with and things we have inherited such as, genes and traits like hair and eye colour. Nurture is the idea that the environment influences us, and goes towards the build-up of our personality’s. The nature vs. Nurture debate is ongoing, it centres around the effect genes have on human personalities as opposed
Nature is the natural mental and physical way a person should act by the way their genes are formed, however nurture changes nature by changing one's environment to change the natural behavior one posses. Nurture is more dominant feature for people's psychological development due to the environment one's in. Nurture is dominant because the environment can change a person's gene features allowing their to cancel out the negative personality they naturally have in their genes. Nature is very deceptive because someone's destiny to be a crazy psychopath can become the opposite in the future, this is the result from environmental, someone raised positively will shape
Nature versus nurture is and important part in deciding how an individual will learn. Nurture is passed down as a natural human instinct. Nurture is physically learning by either watching someone do good or bad. Now a days there is more of a bad influence towards young kids with shootings, drugs and even family abuse.
Nature and nurture are the two important parts that make up who a person is and will become. A way to define nature is, “Nature is the inborn, innate character of an organism” (Rathus pg.56). Some examples of nature are, eye color, hair color, and height. When it comes to the nature versus nurture debate, personality and intelligence both strongly can fall under nature.
The concept of nature versus nurture is that human behaviour is influenced by genetic information inherited from our parents and also by environmental and social influences.