Analysis of Pricing and Model Strategies at Cambridge Software Introduction The purpose of this analysis is to evaluate if Cambridge Software Corporation should offer only one version of it Modeler software application, and if so, which version at which specific price. A second objective of this analysis is to define how many potentially different versions of the Model that CSC should offer, and at which prices. This analysis is heavily based on the concepts of pricing elasticity and the various approaches for measuring the value of software in both enterprises and educational institutions (Cusumano, 2007). Analysis of Cambridge Software Modeler Optimal Version and Price Given the highly unique and differentiated aspect of the Modeler application, its price needs to be based more on the value delivered, not just on the costs in time and labor to produce. The arguments and assumptions made by the members of the Cambridge team in the case for choosing a penetration pricing strategy are erroneous. As research of value-based pricing strategies indicates, the greater the value delivered by a given application or element of intellectual property, the higher the level of value and corresponding price that can be attained (Bala, Carr, 2009). This first foundational element of pricing needs to guide Cambridge's decision of which application to offer and at what price. Second, enterprise software in highly specific niches or areas of the market trend to be more inelastic to
industry covers services and platforms with a vast variety of focal markets. The portion of the
The company must factor in that each of their customers has lifetime value, a greater value than a small gain made on first sales. With competition in their sector, more penetration pricing would be appropriate. The penetrating pricing strategy would only make sense to retain customers; the pricing strategy must realize lifetime value, (University of Phoenix, 2011).
18. Many firms are developing so-called “C-level” specialties in emerging areas with a technology focus, such as:
Application software is essential to make workers more efficient as well as maintain company information. However, determining the best software to use is often difficult. Your course readings provide an IT Performance Model to determine how software contributes to the company. What are the individual areas in this model and how would they be used to determine the type of software needed for an organization? Are there any areas that were left out and how would they be incorporated in this model?
Alternative solutions: We studied four different alternatives: cost +, EVC, price differentiation and contingency pricing.
Pricing is a pertinent issue in procurement and acquisition in organizations. Consumers buying the commodities of an entity should get clarity on pricing related issues. There is uncertainty in Pro
IT Industry leaders are starting to customize their products for the education market. Advantage given that this is tailored just for education that will overall enhance productivity.Prices for ERP systems are dropping. This
First of all, penetration pricing is the major determinant of the price and that is employed when the product managers have to give most of the value to the customers and keeps a small margin. Chatime decided use penetration pricing where set a lower price of milk tea than the eventual market price to attract
I do not agree with Carr when he states that organizations such as IBM and Microsoft recognize this trend and have position themselves as IT utilities companies as more companies replace customized application with generic ones. That the internet has increased the commoditization of IT by providing a perfect delivery channel for generic applications and more and more organization will obtain their IT requirement by purchasing fee-based web services
The software business is a natural monopoly because average total costs continually drop with increase input. The market for computer software presented several problems in relation to antitrust enforcement. American Department of Justice (DOJ) made its complaint against Microsoft in 1994. “DOJ estimated that Microsoft operating systems were to be found on over 120 million PCs, constituting 79% of the operating systems sold to PC manufacturers” (Furse, pg.101). First issue in relation to antitrust enforcement was about the quick market growth. “If markets are continually shifting as technology advances, it may be neither practical nor desirable to subject that market to the strictures of antitrust law” (Furse, pg.100). Second issue was the market in which the desire for product differentiation must be carefully balanced against the need for adjustment. The costs to the consumer of switching from one standard to another can be considerable not because of buying a new software but in difficulties in properly using the new item. So “consumers switch to a technically superior, but poorly adopted spreadsheet that has a different command set and a macro programming language will find it harder,” and therefore more costly, to find assistance. Third
SGMS has been operating with net loss since 2008. The profit margin of -13.1% in fiscal year 2014 and -50.5% in fiscal year 2015 exhibits a troubling historical performance. Though a better profit margin of -10.2% by 2016Q2, the negative net income trends may not turn around in the short run. The negative equity in balance causes negative D/E ratios and nonapplicable Return on Equity in recent years. The company’s high leverage poses threat to its credit and liquidity.
Intuit provides in-product add-ons for additional costs for all potential needs or concerns a consumer may have. Multidimensional pricing may encourage consumer to purchase add-on services and net higher company revenue as the evaluation of final value-to-cost can be skewed when multiple factors are introduced (Herrmann, & Wricke, 1998).
company and the industry is based on trends that are constantly changing to the next big hit. The
Also, additional customer market segments made a quick impact in a crowded marketplace due to the explosive growth of software packaging.
The Internet Software and Services industry is currently in the growth phase of the industry life cycle. Hook defines the growth stage as “Product acceptance is established. Rollout begins and growth accelerates in sales and earnings. Proper execution of strategy remains an issue” (Hook 89).