Animal Testing Inmates

In this study, we used one adult male Sprague-Dawley rat weighing 283 g. The subject was on a 6 am turn on, 6 pm turn off light cycle and was fed and given water regularly. The subject had also already gone through a rotometer test to find the subject’s preferred rotational direction.

Although animals testing help humans in many ways it can be cruel and inhuman to the animals being tested on. Depending on which lab the end up in they could be treated poorly and starved. They could be “inflicted with burn wounds and pain to test for a healing process” (Brown, 2017). This is cruel and just wrong for many reasons. “When testing to evaluate irritation caused by

The harmful use of animals in experiments is not only cruel and inhumane but also often ineffective. Animals do not get many of the human diseases that people do, such as major types of heart disease, many types of cancer, HIV, Parkinson’s disease, or schizophrenia. There have been past occasions where drugs passed on animals weren’t even safe. There is no excuse for animal testing in today’s techy world, there are now many alternatives for animal testing that would put an end to the pain and suffering endured by these innocent animals during human testing.

“Time for your daily pill” shouts the nurse kindly. Though it’s hard to believe people are nice,

1) According to the article, prison-based animal programs could bring a new meaning. What was the article referring to? The article goes into detail on how these programs can provide new meanings to restorative justice, where prisoners simultaneously gain new skills as they give back to the community. They are not only gaining a friend but they are learning how to care and train for these animals. The purpose of these programs is to allow the inmates to train animals and give them to the community. For example maybe a nursing home would adopt an animal to help with stress relief for the individuals who are living in nursing homes, training service dogs, or they may be dogs that training to become future canines. This also helps the inmates by improving areas like honest, empathy, nurturing, self-confidence, and pride of accomplishment.

There have been questions about the morals and ethics behind prisoner research for a long time. Laws were even made to restrict and prevent research on prisoners. An example of such laws is the Nuremburg code which was made because of inhumane research being conducted in concentration camps during WWII. Prisoners are now considered a vulnerable population and research is extremely restricted because of this. Prisoners shouldn't be allowed to participate in scientific research because they can be manipulated, it can be dangerous, and they aren't educated/smart enough to comprehend the tests being conducted.

Somewhere, in the United States, an animal is in terror. It cowers fearfully as scientists hold it down, and a doctor grips a massive, sharp needle next to its neck, ready to inject the animal with a lethal dose of a new, experimental drug. The animal is one of 26 million other creatures facing the same, painful, fate annually (The Hasting Center). Animal testing is the downfall of humanity, a practice of humans testing chemicals, drugs, and cosmetics on animals. Animal testing is an atrocity that is an unnecessary and dangerous ordeal to the subjects being tested on. The fact that it is cruel, is highly inaccurate, and that there are many other ways to achieve the results being pursued all

The article “Animal Activists Finally Have Something To Applaud At Ringling Bros. Circus: Its Closure”, by Amy B. Wang and published by The Washington Post is about Ringling Brothers and Bailey Circus coming to an end. It shows that animal rights groups have strong emotions towards abusing animals for entertainment. Shortly after Feld Entertainment (A production company and owner of Ringling Brothers and Bailey Circus) stopped using elephants but shortly after Ringling Brothers announced their permanent leave from the circus.

If inmates do not consent to being tested on it is their right to say no. Prisoners are a convenient test subject because of the fact they can not escape, but scientists should respect their rights, seeing that they

Ever since the beginning of human history, to the reign of the Mongols, and even to the colonization of the Americas, disease has played a role in shaping society. Its negative impacts has depopulated many cities, countries, and empires. In the distant past, it was quite difficult to avoid contagious diseases. However, in today’s society, steps have been taken to discover new effective modes of treatment through animal testing. Such testing; however, has proved to be quite a controversial issue due to ethics and its utilization of animals. Despite any objections, the use of genetically bred animals is imperative for the purpose of discovering new medications to treat various terminal diseases.

Modern law reflects this idea: “certain forms of research with prisoners are permissible but often require review and approval from several agencies.” (oprs.usc). After decades of developing these laws, one would think that the laws reflect a careful, ethical way of testing on prisoners. In other words, prisoners should be better protected than the average person in medical testing, but that does not mean medical experimentation should be abolished for prisoners. Again, modern law carries this sentiment because “detention centers generally reserve the right to disallow a research activity from going forward at their facility.” (oprs.usc). Beyond a legal standpoint, there is also an argument to be made about the freedom and rights of prisoners. Should a prisoner not be allowed to participate in experiments (of course if complete consent is given). Prisoner experimentation, while it should be under harsher and more stringent regulations, should not be disallowed completely, for both the freedom and right of the prisoner and for large medical

For a while now, “the most preferred of all medical research animals” (Sharav) are prisoners because they are considered to be cheaper than chimpanzees (“Should Prisoners Participate?”). In addition, they have fewer government restrictions than do animals used for research. As a matter of fact, there is no federal law that demands to “keep track of the number of humans used or harmed in clinical trials” (“Should Prisoners Participate?”). Throughout decades, prisoners have been a vulnerable race in scientific exploration because they aren’t able to give a free-willed consent. Therefore, prisoners should not be used as subjects for medical experimentation because of it’s unethicality and the inaccuracy of conviction.

You're living inside a bleak cage, you have absolutely no authority over your life. It is sorrowful and bitter, as each day passes, more experiments leave you agonizing. You never know when you will give in to death. Next, to you, you see a mouse with a tumor bigger than it’s body, a kitten purposely blinded, rats with skulls cut open and electrodes implanted into them. What can you do? This is the life of an animal in a lab. You are doomed to perish one day. You are an animal in a testing lab, these innocent creatures have implantations, have multiple chemicals injected into them, surgery performed on them, and left to die, this is what it means to be an animal who is tested on. Free these innocent animals from torture, give them a chance

Many of us are unaware of the sheer number of animals that undergo constant suffering in the name of human vanity. Animal testing was originally introduced in the early 20th century and is still prominent today. It is morally unacceptable to experiment on animals for human purposes. The procedures used in animal testing are cruel and inhumane, nor are they the most reliable source of data; resulting in many mishaps. Moreover, with the perpetual advancements in technology, there are several alternative methods making animal testing unnecessary. If testing cosmetics and drugs on humans is unacceptable, what makes it acceptable to test on animals?

Aphids fed on Genetically Modified potatoes producing a different toxin were also reported to have a harmful effect on ladybirds feeding on the aphids.